基于生态产品价值的流域生态补偿标准核算研究——以海南省南渡江为例

郭庆; 王敏英; 葛成军; 胡小飞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于生态产品价值的流域生态补偿标准核算研究——以海南省南渡江为例

试验研究

- 基于生态产品价值的流域生态补偿标准核算研究——以海南省南渡江为例
- Accounting for Ecological Compensation Standards in Watersheds Based on Value of Ecological Products—A Case Study of Nandu River Basin in Hainan Province
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第2期页码：267-276
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 海南大学生态与环境学院,海南,海口,570208
  2. 海南省环境科学研究院,海南,海口,571126
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  2019年海南省基础与应用基础研究计划(自然科学领域)高层次人才资助项目(2019RC354);海南省哲学社会科学资助项目〔HNSK(YB)22-29〕
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.031
  中图分类号： X171.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郭庆, 王敏英, 葛成军, 等. 基于生态产品价值的流域生态补偿标准核算研究——以海南省南渡江为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):267-276.

Guo Qing, Wang Minying, Ge Chengjun, et al. Accounting for Ecological Compensation Standards in Watersheds Based on Value of Ecological Products—A Case Study of Nandu River Basin in Hainan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 267-276.
郭庆, 王敏英, 葛成军, 等. 基于生态产品价值的流域生态补偿标准核算研究——以海南省南渡江为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):267-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.031.

Guo Qing, Wang Minying, Ge Chengjun, et al. Accounting for Ecological Compensation Standards in Watersheds Based on Value of Ecological Products—A Case Study of Nandu River Basin in Hainan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 267-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.031.

摘要

[目的] 探索流域生态补偿标准在生态产品价值实现路径中的可操作性，为流域生态环境建设提供理论支撑。 [方法] 以海南省南渡江流域为研究区，基于生态损害赔偿、生态保护补偿理念，将其与InVEST模型和ArcGIS相结合，评估南渡江流域内主要生态系统服务，从生态系统服务变化的角度计算生态补偿标准。 [结果] ① 2015—2020年，南渡江流域内生态系统服务具有明显的空间异质性，中上游地区水源涵养服务、土壤保持服务和水质净化服务能力较强，流域下游地区较低。 ②2015—2020年，流域内水源涵养价值在205.39～260.76亿元之间；土壤保持价值在19.11～20.39亿元之间；水质净化价值在2 782.30~3 233.92万元之间。水源涵养变化量价值在11.50～27.32亿元之间；土壤保持变化量价值在1 137.16～10 365.34万元之间；水质净化变化量价值在7.99～400.59万元之间。 ③根据3种服务功能价值量计算，南渡江流域2016—2020年生态补偿标准为90.62亿元，年生态补偿标准在11.82～28.36亿元之间。 [结论] 2015—2020年，南渡江流域生态系统服务价值在224.81～281.48亿元之间，流域2016—2020年生态补偿标准在11.82～28.36亿元之间。该流域中上游是提供综合生态系统服务的核心区域。

Abstract

[Objective] The usefulness of watershed ecological compensation standards for obtaining the value of ecological products was studied in order to provide theoretical support for effective construction of ecological watershed environments. [Methods] The study was conducted at the Nandu River basin in Hainan Province. The InVEST model and ArcGIS were combined to assess the major ecosystem services within the Nandu River basin based on the concepts of ecological damage compensation and ecological protection compensation. The ecological compensation standard was calculated from the perspective of changes in ecosystem services. [Results] ① Between 2015 and 2020

there was clear spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem services within the Nandu River basin

with higher capacity for water conservation services

sediment retention services

and water purification services in the middle and upper reaches of the Nandu River basin

and lower capacity in the lower reaches of the basin. ② Between 2015 and 2020

the value of water conservation services in the watershed ranged from 2.05×1010 yuan to 2.61×1010 yuan; the value of sediment retention services ranged from 1.91×109 yuan to 20.39×108 yuan; and the value of water purification services ranged from 3.78×107 yuan to 3.23×107 yuan. The value of the volume of change in water conservation services ranged from 1.15×109 yuan to 2.73×109 yuan; the value of the volume of change in sediment retention services ranged from 1.34×107 yuan to 1.04×108 yuan; and the value of the volume of change in water purification services ranged from 7.99×104 yuan to 4.01×106 yuan. ③ Based on the values of the three service functions

the ecological compensation standard for the Nandu River basin was 9.06×109 yuan

and the annual ecological compensation standard ranged from 1.18×109 yuan to 2.82×1010 yuan. [Conclusion] During 2015—2020

the value of ecosystem services in the Nandu River basin ranged from 2.25×1010 yuan to 2.82×1010 yuan. Between 2016 and 2020

the ecological compensation rate at the Nandu River basin ranged from 1.18×109 yuan to 2.84×109 yuan. The upper and middle reaches of the Nandu River basin were the core areas providing integrated ecosystem services.

关键词

Keywords

references

毛显强,钟瑜,张胜.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(4):40-43.

Groot R D, Brander L, Ploeg S V D, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012,1(1):50-61.

Shaozhuo Zhong,Yong Geng, Binbin Huang, et al. Quantitative assessment of eco-compensation standard from the perspective of ecosystem services: A case study of Erhai in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,263:121530.

郭庆,王敏英,王晨野.流域生态补偿标准核算方法研究进展[J].浙江林业科技,2022,42(2):84-89.

Costanza R, D’arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 1997,387(6630):253-260.

Liang Li, Zuhong Fan, Kangning Xiong, et al. Current situation and prospects of the studies of ecological industries and ecological products in eco-fragile areas [J]. Environmental Research, 2021,201:111613.

张林波,虞慧怡,李岱青,等.生态产品内涵与其价值实现途径[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(6):173-183.

高振斌,王小莉,苏婧,等.基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(6):563-570.

Duan Jie, Yan Yan, Wang De, et al. Principle analysis and method improvement on cost calculation in watershed ecological compensation [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(1):221-227.

李芬,李文华,甄霖,等.森林生态系统补偿标准的方法探讨:以海南省为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(5):735-745.

Xin Gao, Juqin Shen, Weijun He, et al. Spatial-temporal analysis of ecosystem services value and research on ecological compensation in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province in China from 2005 to 2018 [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,317:128241.

Sheng Wenping, Zhen Lin, Xie Gaodi, et al. Determining eco-compensation standards based on the ecosystem services value of the mountain ecological forests in Beijing, China [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,26(b):422-430.

蒋毓琪,陈珂.流域生态补偿研究综述[J].生态经济,2016,32(4):175-180.

黄从红,杨军,张文娟.生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3360-3367.

周文佐,刘高焕,潘剑君.土壤有效含水量的经验估算研究:以东北黑土为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(4):88-95.

He Feng, Jin Jie, Zhang Hong, et al. The change of ecological service value and the promotion mode of ecological function in mountain development using InVEST model [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021,14(6):1-8.

潘韬,吴绍洪,戴尔阜,等.基于InVEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):183-189.

张翠萍,姜佳,白杨.重点生态功能区建设对海南中部山区水源涵养功能的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(5):66-72.

刘娇,郎学东,苏建荣,等.基于InVEST模型的金沙江流域干热河谷区水源涵养功能评估[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8099-8111.

周伏建,陈明华,林福兴,等.福建省降雨侵蚀力指标的初步探讨[J].福建水土保持,1989,1(2):58-60.

Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity [J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 1983,38(5):381-383.

张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.

蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.

饶恩明,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.海南岛生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及影响因素[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):746-755.

Wang Xiuming, Liu Xucheng, Long Yingxian, et al. Analysis of soil retention service function in the north area of Guangdong based on the InVEST model [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020,510(3):032011.

胡胜,曹明明,刘琪,等.不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2393-2406.

吴哲,陈歆,刘贝贝,等.基于InVEST模型的海南岛氮磷营养物负荷的风险评估[J].热带作物学报,2013,34(9):1791-1797.

葛成军,唐文浩,陈淼,等.海南岛典型农业土壤产流与面源污染特征分析[J].热带作物学报,2015,36(8):1469-1474.

吴瑞,刘桂环,文一惠.基于InVEST模型的官厅水库流域产水和水质净化服务时空变化[J].环境科学研究,2017,30(3):406-414.

田义超,白晓永,黄远林,等.基于生态系统服务价值的赤水河流域生态补偿标准核算[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(11):312-322.

宁亚洲,张福平,冯起,等.秦岭水源涵养功能时空变化及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(9):3080-3091.

李昂,叶长青,朱丽蓉,等.土地利用/覆被变化对产水服务功能的影响:以海南热带雨林国家公园为例[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(5):36-45.

郭年冬,李恒哲,李超,等.基于生态系统服务价值的环京津地区生态补偿研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(11):1473-1480.

陈伊郴,李硕,徐慧珺,等.海南中部生态核心区流域水资源横向生态补偿方法[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1149-1156.

陈姗姗,刘康,包玉斌,等.商洛市水源涵养服务功能空间格局与影响因素[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1546-1554.

浏览量

654

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系

内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗退化草原生态经济损失空间分异规律及驱动因子

基于HRAI-InVEST的NbS水文适配协同效益评估

基于生态产品价值实现的中国省域耕地差异化生态补偿标准体系研究

南方典型红壤区竹节沟生态系统服务功能评价及经济价值