2010—2020年农牧交错带生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关系——以桑干河流域(山西段)为例

赵艺芳; 原野; 高嫄

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.028

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

2010—2020年农牧交错带生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关系——以桑干河流域(山西段)为例

试验研究

- 2010—2020年农牧交错带生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关系——以桑干河流域(山西段)为例
- Spatial Relationship Between Ecosystem Service and Residents’ Well-being in a Farming-Pastoral Zone During 2010—2020—A Case Study of Sanggan River (Shanxi Section)
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第2期页码：239-247
- 作者机构：
  
  山西财经大学公共管理学院,山西,太原,030006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“黄土区大型露天煤矿复垦高压实土壤有机碳恢复机理研究”(41907408);山西省高等学校科技创新项目“平朔露天煤矿不同复垦模式生态系统多功能性特征诊断与评价”(2019L0496)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.028
  中图分类号： X24;X826;X171.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵艺芳, 原野, 高嫄. 2010—2020年农牧交错带生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关系——以桑干河流域(山西段)为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):239-247.

Zhao Yifang, Yuan Ye, Gao Yuan. Spatial Relationship Between Ecosystem Service and Residents’ Well-being in a Farming-Pastoral Zone During 2010—2020—A Case Study of Sanggan River (Shanxi Section)[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 239-247.
赵艺芳, 原野, 高嫄. 2010—2020年农牧交错带生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关系——以桑干河流域(山西段)为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):239-247. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.028.

Zhao Yifang, Yuan Ye, Gao Yuan. Spatial Relationship Between Ecosystem Service and Residents’ Well-being in a Farming-Pastoral Zone During 2010—2020—A Case Study of Sanggan River (Shanxi Section)[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 239-247. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.028.

摘要

[目的] 探析农牧交错带流域生态系统服务与居民福祉之间的空间关联，为该区生态系统管理服务于社会经济的可持续发展提供决策依据。 [方法] 基于修正的生态系统服务价值当量因子法，运用熵权法和聚类分析等方法，探讨了农牧交错带典型区域—桑干河流域(山西段)14个县(区)2010，2015和2020年生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联特征。 [结果] ①2010—2020年间桑干河流域(山西段)人均生态系统服务价值和居民福祉整体上均呈现上升趋势。研究区人均生态系统服务价值呈现中部和西南部低的空间分布格局；居民福祉水平的高值区则分布在沿桑干河主干道的西南—东北方向上。 ②研究区生态系统服务和居民福祉的空间关联模式有：高服务高福祉、高服务低福祉、高服务中福祉、低服务高福祉、低服务中福祉、低服务低福祉、中服务高福祉、中服务中福祉。2010—2020年间桑干河流域(山西段)生态系统服务和居民福祉的空间关联模式发生变化的区域主要分布在西南—东北方向上。 ③桑干河流域(山西段)宜通过积极推进资源型经济转型发展及加强国土空间生态保护与修复等途径提高区域生态系统服务与居民福祉。 [结论] 2010—2020年间桑干河流域生态系统服务价值与居民福祉均呈增长趋势，两者的空间关联模式呈现明显的空间分异规律。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial relationship between ecosystem service and residents’ well-being in a farming-pastoral zone was studied in order to determine the way in which ecosystem management could produce sustainable development of the social economy. [Methods] The spatial relationship and dynamic features of ecosystem service and residents’ well-being in fourteen counties (districts) in the Sanggan River basin (Shanxi section)

a typical area of the farming-pastoral zone

in 2010

2015

and 2020 were analyzed by using the entropy weight method and cluster analysis based on the modified equivalent factor method of ecosystem service value. [Results] ① From 2010 to 2020

both the per capita ecosystem service value and residents’ well-being in the Sanggan River basin (Shanxi section) showed an upward trend. The lower values of per capita ecosystem service occurred in the central and southwest part of the Sanggan River basin

while the high values of residents’ well-being were located in the southwest and northeast direction along the Sanggan River channel. ② The spatial correlation models of ecosystem service and residents’ well-being in the study area were: high service and high well-being

high service and low well-being

high service and medium well-being

low service and high well-being

low service and medium well-being

low service and low well-being

medium service and high well-being

medium service and medium well-being. From 2010 to 2020

the spatial correlation models of ecosystem services and residents’ well-being in the Sanggan River basin (Shanxi section) had changed mainly in the southwest and northeast direction. ③ The Sanggan River basin (Shanxi section) could improve regional ecosystem services and residents’ well-being by promoting the transformation and development of resource-based economy and strengthening the protection and restoration of land space ecology. [Conclusion] From 2010 to 2020

the value of ecosystem services and the well-being of residents in the Sanggan River basin have shown an increasing trend

and their spatial correlation patterns show obvious spatial differentiation.

关键词

Keywords

references

郭宗亮,刘亚楠,张璐,等.生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):928-936.

熊鹰,侯珂伦,郑偲睿,等.基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系:以广东省乐昌市为例[J].热带地理,2020,40(5):843-855.

程宪波,陶宇,欧维新.生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(7):885-893.

Assesment M E. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis [J]. Physics Teacher, 2005,34(9):534-534.

陈茂林,官冬杰,孙灵丽,等.三峡库区生态系统服务对农户生计贡献率测算及影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(01):397-407.

张羿轲,方一平,杨悦,等.岷江上游山区生态福祉波动的人类活动干扰研究[J].山地学报,2021,39(2):238-247.

熊鹰,肖蓉,张坤,等.南方丘陵山地农户对生态系统服务的感知及其影响因素:以湖南省慈利县为例[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(7):1766-1781.

郑德凤,王燕燕,曹永强,等.基于生态系统服务的生态福祉分类与时空格局:以中国地级及以上城市为例[J].资源科学,2020,42(6):1110-1122.

李昂,米长虹,杨琰瑛,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务与居民福祉时空分异及耦合协调关系[J].生态经济,2023,39(4):170-178.

刘迪,陈海,张行,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响及其群体差异[J].地理研究,2022,41(5):1298-1310.

肖涛,石强胜,闻熠,等.湿地生态系统服务研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(6):1205-1212.

王圣云,罗玉婷,韩亚杰,等.中国人类福祉地区差距演变及其影响因素:基于人类发展指数(HDI)的分析[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(8):1150-1158.

Aguado M, González J A, López-Santiago C, et al. Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception along a rural-urban gradient in the high Andes of Ecuador [J]. Ecosystem services, 2018,34:1-10.

Suárez A E, Gutiérrez-Montes I, Ortiz-Morea F A, et al. Contribution of livelihoods to the well-being of coffee-growing households in southern Colombia: A structural equation modeling approach [J]. Sustainability, 2022,14(2):743-753.

Wallace K J, Jago M, Pannell D J, et al. Wellbeing, values, and planning in environmental management [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,277:111447.

李昂,杨琰瑛,师荣光,等.居民福祉及其与生态系统服务的关系研究进展[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(5):948-957.

Liu Lumeng, Fang Xuening, Wu Jiangguo. How does the local-scale relationship between ecosystem services and human wellbeing vary across broad regions? [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022,816:151493.

高嫄,原野,赵艺芳.基于生态系统服务供需的农牧交错带流域生态修复分区：以桑干河上游为例[J/OL].环境工程技术学报:1-15[2023 -03-20].

李文青,赵雪雁,杜昱璇,等.秦巴山区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合关系的时空变化[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(10):2522-2540.

Lapointe M, Gurney G G, Coulthard S, et al. Ecosystem services, well-being benefits and urbanization associations in a small Island Developing State [J]. People and Nature, 2021,3:391-404.

谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.

陕永杰,原卫利,苗圆,等.山西省大同市2000—2019生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):310-317,344.

雷军成,王莎,汪金梅,等.土地利用变化对寻乌县生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(9):3089-3099.

张继飞,邓伟,朱昌丽,等.岷江上游生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联及其动态特征[J].山地学报,2017,35(3):388-398.

柳冬青,张金茜,巩杰,等.陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度—生态系统服务—人类福祉时空关系研究:以安定区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):637-648.

Yang Hongbo, Dietz Thomas, Yang Wu, et al. Changes in human well-being and rural livelihoods under natural disasters [J]. Ecological Economics, 2018,151:184-194.

赵筱青,李思楠,普军伟,等.云南喀斯特山区国土空间优化分区与管控[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(10):2339-2357.

浏览量

826

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

禁牧政策对农牧交错带典型区畜牧业的影响

酒泉-金塔盆地绿洲土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值评估

三江源地区林草生态系统水源涵养服务评估

生态退化与恢复对三江源区土壤保持功能的影响

基于格网的石漠化地区生态系统服务与经济空间耦合