1. 新疆师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830054
2. 新疆干旱区湖泊资源与环境重点实验室,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830054
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
曾燚, 马倩, 王佩. 新疆艾勒逊乌拉沙漠沙丘表层沉积物粒径及分形特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):87-94.
Zeng Yi, Ma Qian, Wang Pei. Granularity and Fractal Characteristics of Surface Sediment in Sand Dunes of Arexunula Desert in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 87-94.
曾燚, 马倩, 王佩. 新疆艾勒逊乌拉沙漠沙丘表层沉积物粒径及分形特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):87-94. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.011.
Zeng Yi, Ma Qian, Wang Pei. Granularity and Fractal Characteristics of Surface Sediment in Sand Dunes of Arexunula Desert in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 87-94. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.011.
[目的] 对新疆艾勒逊乌拉沙漠表层沉积物粒度特征进行研究,旨在了解其地表沉积物粒度特征及影响沉积物粒度分布的因素。 [方法] 对沙漠及沙丘表层沉积物粒度进行粒级划分,并对粒度参数、分形维数分析。 [结果] ①研究区表层沉积物平均粒径为284.63 μm,中砂为主,占48.93%;偏度为-0.18,呈负偏,距沙源近,搬运介质动力强;分选系数为1.10,分选性极好;峰度值为1.01,属常峰态,沉积物颗粒分布较均匀。 ②流动性沙丘和半固定沙丘表层沉积物偏度值分别为-0.13和-0.08,分别呈负偏、中等,两类沙丘粗砂砾较多;分选系数分别为1.66和1.76,均呈中等,沉积物粒度分布较均匀;峰度值分别为1.10和1.12,为常峰态和较窄峰,说明沙丘的粗颗粒沉积物在沙漠中相对集中。 ③流动性沙丘和半固定沙丘从迎风坡底到背风坡底表层沉积物的粒度平均粒径值依次分别为289.58,310.44,290.92,277.64,275.36 μm和310.34,306.68,337.78,290.36,277.68 μm,两类沙丘粗颗粒沉积物均集中在迎风坡。半固定沙丘迎风坡粗颗粒沉积物含量高于流动性沙丘迎风坡粗颗粒沉积物含量,半固定沙丘截沙能力更强;流动性沙丘和半固定沙丘的分选系数从迎风坡底到背风坡底变化趋势,前者波动大,呈W形变化,后者变化小,呈V形变化,灌丛植被使分选系数变化趋势在丘顶转折; ④沙漠表层沉积物粒度的分形维数值是1.35,半固定沙丘和流动性沙丘表层沉积物粒度的分形维数分值别为1.59和1.34。分形维数的波动强度影响沉积物颗粒分布的均匀度、土壤肥力和植被生长。 [结论] 艾勒逊乌拉沙漠距沙源近,沙丘的粗颗粒沉积物在沙漠中相对集中,灌丛是影响表层沉积物粒度分布特征的因素之一。
[Objective] The granularity characteristics of surface sediments in the Arexunula Desert in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region were studied in order to understand the characteristics of surface sediments in the study area and the factors affecting the granularity distribution of sediments. [Methods] Granularity was divided into grains
granularity parameters
and fractal dimension of the surface sediments for the Arexunula Desert and sand dunes in Xinjiang were analyzed. [Results] ① The granularity size of surface sediments in the study area was 284.63 μm
with medium sand dominant
accounting for 48.93%. The skewness was -0.18
with a negative bias
close to the sand source. The transport medium had strong dynamics. The sorting coefficient was 1.10
and the sorting performance was excellent. The kurtosis value was 1.01
which was a normal peak state
and the sediment particles were evenly distributed. ② The skewness values of surface sediments of mobile sand dunes and semi-fixed sand dunes were -0.13 and -0.08
respectively
which indicated negative skewness and medium skewness
respectively
and there was a large amount of coarse gravel in both types of dunes. The sorting coefficients were 1.66 and 1.76
both of which were medium
and the sediment granularity distribution was relatively uniform. The kurtosis values were 1.10 and 1.12
respectively
which were normal and narrow peaks
indicating that the coarse-grained sediments of sand dunes were relatively concentrated in the desert. ③ The average granularity values of surface sediments from the bottom of the windward slope to the bottom of the leeward slope were 289.58
310.44
290.92
277.64
275.36
310.34 and 306.68
337.78
290.36
277.68 μm
respectively. The coarse-particle sediments of the two types of sand dunes were concentrated in the windward slope. The coarse particle sediment content of the semi-fixed dune windward slope was higher than that of the mobile dune windward slope
and the semi-fixed sand dune had stronger sand interception ability. The sorting coefficients of mobile sand dunes and semi-fixed sand dunes changed from the bottom of the windward slope to the bottom of the leeward slope. The former fluctuated greatly and showed a W-shape
and the latter changed little and was V-shaped. Shrub vegetation made the sorting coefficient change trend turn at the top of the dune. ④ The fractal dimension value of the grain size of desert surface sediments was 1.35
and the fractal dimension values of the particle size of semi-fixed sand dunes and mobile sand dunes were 1.59 and 1.34
respectively. The fluctuation intensity of fractal dimension affected the uniformity of sediment particle distribution
soil fertility
and vegetation growth. [Conclusion] The Arexunula Desert is close to the sand source
and the coarse-grained sediments of the dunes were relatively concentrated in the desert. Shrubland is one of the factors affecting the granularity distribution characteristics of surface sediments.
王忠臣,钱亦兵,张海燕,等.东天山喀尔里克山北坡淖毛湖盆地土壤粒度分布特征及成因[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(5):1035-1043.
宋洁,春喜,白雪梅,等.中国沙漠粒度分析研究综述[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(3):597-603.
靳鹤龄,董光荣,左昕昕.滴哨沟湾地层沉积特征记录的毛乌素沙漠变迁[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(6):1064-1072.
杜海燕,周智彬,刘凤山,等.绿洲化过程中阿拉尔垦区土壤粒径分形变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(4):615-622.
王瑞东,高永,党晓宏,等.近自然恢复状态下荒漠草原不同群落表土粒度特征研究[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1309-1316.
靳建辉,曹相东,李志忠,等.艾比湖周边灌丛沙堆风沙沉积记录的气候环境演化[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1314-1323.
黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:69-70.
杨世荣,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.库布齐沙漠生态光伏电站不同覆盖类型下土壤粒度特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):112-118.
Ding Z, Derbyshire E, Yang S, et al. Stacked 2.6-Ma grain size record from the Chinese loess based on five sections and correlation with the deep-sea δ
18
O record [J]. Paleoceanography, 2002,17(3):15-21.
Huayu Lu , Xiaodong Liu , Fuqing Zhang , et al. Astronomical calibration of loess-paleosol deposits at Luochuan, Central Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Paleogeogr Paleoclimatol Paleoecol, 1999,154(3):237-246.
Zhang Yalu, Chun Xi, Zhou Haijun, et al. Particle size characteristics of surface sediments and their environmental significance: A comparative study of deserts in arid western Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Environmental Geology, 2020,79(10): 301-314.
Jin H. Climatic change and evolution of Hunshandake Desert in China since middle Holocene [J]. Congress of the International Union for Quaternary Research, 2004,49(16):1730-1735.
吴昕.内蒙古锡林郭勒草原沙质荒漠化的沙源及其地质学成因分析[D].湖北 武汉:中国地质大学,2018.
黄银洲,王乃昂,程弘毅,等.毛乌素沙地历史时期沙漠化:基于北大池湖泊周边沉积剖面粒度的研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):426-432.
王思齐,魏东岚,张威.末次冰期以来辽东半岛风沙沉积的粒度端元特征与古气候演变研究[J].第四纪研究,2022,42(2):338-349.
巩雪娇,王攀,杨振京,等.粒度端元记录的靖边地区MIS3以来的气候变化[J].地质科技通报,2021,40(1):184-191.
马茜茜,谢小松,肖建华,等.阿联酋迪拜中部沙漠沉积物粒度特征及其沉积环境分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(11):104-109.
姚正毅,李晓英,肖建华.青海湖滨土地沙漠化驱动机制[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1429-1437.
张惜伟,汪季,海春兴,等.呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑地表风沙流结构特征[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(6):1505-1511.
李占宏,海春兴,刘广通.内蒙古沙漠化土地中不同土地类型土壤表面可蚀性颗粒对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,66(1):4-8.
毛丽,苏志珠,王国玲,等.毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):589-598.
Chitra N, S. Bala S, Inieo V I, et al. Modeling and experiments to estimate radon emanation factor in soil-grain size and moisture effect [J]. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2021,194(3):104-112.
张桂华,刘洪妍,介冬梅,等.科尔沁沙地不同类型沙丘表土有机质与粒度特征差异分析[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(11):2223-2230.
刘兴春.博斯腾湖南岸阿克别勒库姆沙漠封禁保护治理措施[J].新疆林业,2016(3):10-11.
杨玖贵.博斯腾湖度假旅游开发的实证研究[D].新疆 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2014.
Folk R L, Ward W C. Brazos river bar: A study in the significance of grain size parameters [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1957,27(1):3-26.
Chester K W. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments [J]. The Journal of Geology, 1922,30(5):377-392.
马倩雯,来风兵.塔克拉玛干沙漠和田河西侧胡杨沙堆粒度特征[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2020,14(6):114-120.
阿斯耶姆·图尔迪,李新国,靳万贵,等.开都河流域下游绿洲土壤粒度特征分析[J].土壤通报,2013,44(6):1343-1350.
潘美慧,郝泽文,齐宇涵,等.西藏朋曲流域不同地貌部位流动沙丘粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(6):138-147.
王国玲,苏志珠,毛丽,等.中国北方农牧交错带鄂尔多斯高原段土壤表层粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):183-190.
李小乐,魏亚娟,党晓宏,等.红砂灌丛沙堆土壤粒度组成及养分积累特征[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(3):933-942.
杨兴华,何清,艾力·买买提依明,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠东南缘沙尘暴过程中近地表沙尘水平通量观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1299-1304.
0
浏览量
655
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621