1. 黑龙江大学 现代农业与生态环境学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080
2. 交通运输部公路科学研究所,北京,100088
3. 黑龙江省水利科学研究院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
张瑞豪, 肖洋, 邵社刚, 等. 黑土区坡耕地侵蚀沟演变对土壤粒径分布及蓄水性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):1-8.
Zhang Ruihao, Xiao Yang, Shao Shegang, et al. Effects of Erosion Gully Evolution on Particle Size Distribution and Water Storage Properties in Sloping Cropland of a Black Soil Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 1-8.
张瑞豪, 肖洋, 邵社刚, 等. 黑土区坡耕地侵蚀沟演变对土壤粒径分布及蓄水性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):1-8. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.001.
Zhang Ruihao, Xiao Yang, Shao Shegang, et al. Effects of Erosion Gully Evolution on Particle Size Distribution and Water Storage Properties in Sloping Cropland of a Black Soil Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 1-8. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.001.
[目的
]
研究侵蚀作用对黑土区坡耕地侵蚀沟表层土壤的影响,为该区土壤资源合理运用和区域水土流失治理工作提供理论支持。 [方法
]
以黑龙江省哈尔滨市延寿县不同发育程度侵蚀沟为研究对象,对切沟沟头的沟坡和沟底土壤的粒径分布及蓄水性进行定量描述。 [结果
]
①不同深度处土壤容重、最大吸持贮水量、最大滞留水量、总库容、死库容、最大有效库容差异显著(p<0.05)。随土层加深,土壤容重增大,贮水量、持水性、有效水分下降。各层最大吸持贮水量占饱和贮水量均约90%,有效水分利用率分别为44.79%和41.87%,侵蚀沟发育对土壤有效水分影响明显。 ②入渗特征总体表现为:初始入渗速率>30 min入渗速率>稳定入渗速率,3者在不同编号沟道的A
2
—A
4
间随土层的加深,入渗性能下降。在20—40 cm层A
1
—A
4
的入渗特征均表现为:CK(对照)>A
1
>A
4
>A
2
>A
3
,呈先下降后上升趋势。随着侵蚀沟的发育,土壤入渗性先下降后上升。 ③侵蚀沟的发育是黏粒含量变化的主要原因,黏粒所占比例在0—40 cm层呈先增大,后减小趋势;砂粒所占比例在0—20 cm土层先减小,后增大,呈粗骨化趋势。 ④土壤退化指数在0—20 cm层表现为:A
1
>A
2
>A
3
>A
4
。随侵蚀沟的发育,土壤退化程度加剧,A
4
土壤退化最为严重。 [结论
]
不同深度的土壤剖面差异是造成黑土土壤物理性质差异的主要原因,随着侵蚀沟的发育,0—20 cm层土壤蓄水性能减弱,土壤退化严重。
[Objective] The effects of erosion on the surface soil of erosion gullies in sloping cropland soils in a black soil area were studied in order to provide theoretical support for the rational utilization of soil resources and regional soil and water conservation work in black soil areas. [Methods] The study was conducted on erosion gullies with different degrees of development in Yanshou County
Harbin City
Heilongjiang Provicne. Particle size distribution and water storage properties of soil on the slope
at the bottom of the gullies and at the head of the gullies were quantitatively described. [Results] ① Soil bulk density
maximum water-storage capacity
maximum water-retention capacity
total storage capacity
dead storage capacity
and maximum effective storage capacity at different depths were significantly different (p<0.05). As soil depth increased
soil bulk density also increased
and water-storage
water-retention
and effective water storage capacity decreased. Each layer had a maximum water-storage capacity of about 90% of its saturated capacity
and the effective water utilization rates were 44.79% and 41.87%
respectively. The development of erosion gullies had a clear influence on effective soil water. ② The infiltration characteristics generally showed that the initial infiltration rate>the 30-minute infiltration rate>the stable infiltration rate. As soil depth increased
the infiltration characteristics of the three indicators decreased between gully A2 and A4 for different erosion degree gullies. In the 20—40 cm layer
the infiltration characteristics of gully A1 to A4 followed the order of CK (control group)> gully A1> gully A4> gully A2> gully A3. Infiltration initially declined and then increased. With the development of the erosion gully
soil infiltration decreased and then increased. ③ The development of erosion gullies was the main reason for the change in clay content. The percentage of clay in the 0—40 cm layer tended to increase first and then decrease. The percentage of sand in the 0—20 cm layer tended to decrease first and then increase
showing a trend toward increased coarseness. ④ The soil degradation index followed the order of gully A1> gully A2> gully A3> gully A4 in the 0—20 cm layer. Soil degradation increased with the development of erosion gullies. Soil degradation was most severe in gully A4. [Conclusion] The differences in soil profiles was the main reason for the differences in physical properties of black soil. Soil water-holding capacity in the 0—20 cm layer was weakened and soil degradation became severe as erosion gullies developed.
吴佳.黄土高原旱坡地秋作入渗蓄水与防蚀作用特征研究[D].陕西 西安:西安理工大学,2016.
路中,雷国平,王居午,等.30年来东北典型黑土区水土流失敏感性时空分异特征研究[J],自然灾害学报,2019,28(4):186-195.
许文旭,杨献坤,崔斌,等.东北黑土区典型坡耕地土层厚度及退化程度分析[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(3):28-36.
陈敏.典型黑土淀积层分布及抗蚀性特征的研究[D].黑龙江 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2010.
李智广,王岩松,刘宪春,等.我国东北黑土区侵蚀沟道的普查方法与成果[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(5):9-13.
万炜,李含微,王佳莹,等.基于空间平滑法的旱作区粮食产量时空变化与影响因素研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(16):284-296.
张兴义,刘晓冰,赵军.黑土利用与保护[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
李保国,刘忠,黄峰,等.巩固黑土地粮仓保障国家粮食安全[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(10):1184-1193.
温艳茹.黑土区典型农业小流域沟蚀发育历史、速度和关键过程研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所),2020.
徐金忠.典型黑土区切沟发育关键驱动因素及特征研究[D].黑龙江 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2020.
李桂芳.典型黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀影响因素与动力学机理研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2016.
Rodrigo C, Sinoga J R, Gonzalez J D S, et al. High variability of soil erosion and hydrological processes in Mediterranean hillslope vineyards (Montes de Malaga, Spain) [J]. Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution, 2016,145:274-284.
姚贤良,程云生.土壤物理学[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:122-126.
Leonard J, Andrieux P. Infiltration characteristics of soils in Mediterranean vineyards in Southern France [J]. Catena, 1998,32(3/4):209-223.
杨光,丁国栋,赵廷宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕还林的水土保持效益研究:以陕西省吴旗县为例[J].水土保持通报,2006(02):88-90,99.
薛飞.基于超渗—蓄满产流模式的分布式水文模型在半干湿地区的构建及应用[D].河南 郑州:华北水利水电大学,2017.
程思贤,刘卫玲,靳英杰,等.深松深度对砂姜黑土耕层特性、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(9):1355-1365.
高燕.黑土区不同侵蚀方式对土壤团聚体和泥沙颗粒流失的影响研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
张加子琦.东北黑土区长缓复合侵蚀坡面土壤可蚀性参数研究[D].辽宁 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2019.
范昊明,蔡强国,王红闪.中国东北黑土区土壤侵蚀环境[J].水土保持学报,2004(02):66-70.
Randolph J. Environmental land use planning and management [J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2005,24(4):452-453.
孙仕军,丁跃元,曹波,等.平原井灌区土壤水库调蓄能力分析[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(1):42-47.
黄荣珍,杨玉盛,张金池,等.不同林地类型土壤水库蓄水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(3):1-5.
娄义宝,史东梅,江娜,等.土壤侵蚀对坡耕地土壤水分及入渗特性影响[J].土壤学报,2020,57(6):1399-1410.
Adejuwon J O, Ekanade O. A comparison of soil properties under different landuse types in a part of the Nigerian cocoa belt [J]. Catena, 1988,15(3/4):319-331.
金慧芳,史东梅,陈正发,等.基于聚类及PCA分析的红壤坡耕地耕层土壤质量评价指标[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(7):155-164.
陈正发,史东梅,金慧芳,等.基于土壤管理评估框架的云南坡耕地耕层土壤质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(3):256-267.
许明祥,刘国彬,赵允格.黄土丘陵区土壤质量评价指标研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(10):1843-1848.
Xu Mingxiang, Li Qiang, Wilson G. Degradation of soil physicochemical quality by ephemeral gully erosion on sloping cropland of the hilly Loess Plateau, China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016,155:9-18.
0
浏览量
822
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621