江西农业大学 国土资源与环境学院,江西,南昌,330045
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
雷凯星, 余敦, 王检萍, 等. 南方丘陵山区村域乡村振兴潜力评价及类型识别——以江西省兴国县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):281-290.
Lei Kaixing, Yu Dun, WangJianping, et al. Potential Evaluation and Type Identification of Rural Vitalization in Hilly and Mountainous Villages in South China—A Case Study at Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 281-290.
雷凯星, 余敦, 王检萍, 等. 南方丘陵山区村域乡村振兴潜力评价及类型识别——以江西省兴国县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):281-290. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.032.
Lei Kaixing, Yu Dun, WangJianping, et al. Potential Evaluation and Type Identification of Rural Vitalization in Hilly and Mountainous Villages in South China—A Case Study at Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 281-290. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.032.
[目的] 科学开展村庄类型识别,为江西省兴国县国土空间总体规划编制和乡村振兴战略实施提供技术支撑和决策参考,为南方丘陵山区村庄类型识别提供经验借鉴。[方法] 以村域为研究单元,分别构建村庄布局适宜性评价指标体系与乡村振兴潜力评价指标体系,采用AHP和CRITIC法组合确定指标权重,构建耦合协调度模型识别兴国县村庄类型。[结果] ①兴国县村庄布局适宜性总体水平一般,以中适宜性等级为主,空间分布差异显著,呈现出“中心城区向四周阶梯式递减”的分布特征; ②乡村振兴潜力水平有待提高,高值区主要分布在城区周边和各镇区驻地; ③村庄布局适宜性与乡村振兴潜力耦合度较高,协调性有待提高,耦合协调度一般,初级耦合协调村庄最多; ④将兴国县村庄类型识别为城郊融合类、集聚发展类、存续提升类、特色保护类和搬迁撤并类5类。[结论] 村庄布局与当地的地形、社会经济发展有着紧密的联系,乡村振兴潜力与布局适宜性呈现出明显的正相关关系,应针对不同村庄类型提出不同发展策略。
[Objective] The village type identification was carried out scientifically to provide technical support and a decision-making reference for the formulation of the overall territorial space planning and the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy for Xingguo County
Jiangxi Province
in order to provide experience reference for the village type identification in the hills and mountains in Southern China. [Methods] Villages were taken as the research units. A village layout suitability evaluation index system and a rural revitalization potential evaluation index system were constructed. The village types in Xingguo County were identified by combining the AHP and CRITIC methods to determine the index weight. A coupling coordination model was constructed. [Results] ① The overall village layout suitability in Xingguo County was in the general level
and the suitability grades were mainly in the middle suitability level
with significant differences in spatial distribution
showing the spatial characteristics of “decreasing in a stepwise manner from the central part of the city to the surrounding areas”. ② The overall level of rural revitalization potential needs to be improved. The high-level areas were mainly located in the villages surrounding the urban areas and the resident villages of each township. ③ The coupling degree between the suitability of village layout and rural revitalization was high. The coordination degree needs to be improved from the average coupling coordination degree
with the largest number of villages at the primary coupling coordination degree. ④ The types of villages in Xingguo County were identified as suburban integration villages
clustered development villages
survival and upgrading villages
characteristic protection villages
and relocated and evacuated villages. Corresponding development strategies were proposed for different types of villages. [Conclusion] Village layout was closely related to local topography and social and economic development. The potential of rural revitalization was positively correlated with the suitability of rural layout. Therefore
different development strategies should be proposed for different village types.
黄道涵,温锋华,陈慧霞.基于多因子分析的村庄布局优化路径研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S1):464-468.
杨晓娟,杨永春.乡村振兴背景下关中地区县域村庄布局规划策略探析:以韩城市为例[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(2):127-134.
唐秀美,刘玉,任艳敏.基于适宜性与发展水平评价的村庄用地类型划分[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(1):283-291.
陈伟强,代亚强,耿艺伟,等.基于POI数据和引力模型的村庄分类方法研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):195-204.
林孝松,王莹,余情,等.奉节县村庄发展潜力评价与类型识别[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(3):320-328.
杨绪红,吴晓莉,范渊,等.规划引导下利津县村庄分类与整治策略[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(5):232-241.
唐林楠,刘玉,潘瑜春,等.基于BP模型和Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1514-1521.
韩欣宇,闫凤英.乡村振兴背景下乡村发展综合评价及类型识别研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(9):156-165.
牛子浩,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.喀斯特山区乡村性空间分异及发展类型:以贵州省盘州市为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):316-324.
房艳刚,刘建志.东北地区县域粮劳变化耦合模式与乡村发展类型[J].地理学报,2020,75(10):2241-2255.
黄亚平,郑有旭.江汉平原乡村聚落形态类型及空间体系特征[J].地理科学,2021,41(1):121-128.
璩路路,李裕瑞,李琳娜,等.农牧交错带乡村空间发展类型及影响因素研究[J].经济地理,2019,39(10):153-161.
曾灿,李伯华,李翠菲,等.欠发达地区村庄发展类型识别与振兴对策:以湘西州凤凰县为例[J].经济地理,2021,41(12):167-176.
徐维祥,李露,周建平,等.乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2044-2062.
任祁荣,于恩逸.甘肃省生态环境与社会经济系统协调发展的耦合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2944-2953.
屠爽爽,郑瑜晗,龙花楼,等.乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径:以广西为例[J].地理学报,2020,75(2):365-381.
刘健,郭璨,刘亚秋,等.平原农区适宜性—集约性耦合协调的乡村空间重构[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(2):394-405.
侯淑涛,丁玲,陈建龙,等.基于组合特征的黑龙江省村庄用地整理分区研究[J].农业现代化研究,2020,41(3):520-529.
周智,贾丽,黄英,等.农村居民点整治工程选址适宜性评价与决策[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):323-326.
王梦婧,吕悦风,吴次芳,等.国土空间规划背景下的县域村庄分类模式研究: 以山东省莱州市为例[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(9):1-7.
孟秋莉.基于PSR模型的乡村旅游环境保护评价指标体系研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(4):121-126.
欧维新,邹怡,刘敬杰,等.基于乡村振兴潜力和土地利用效率的村庄分类研究[J].上海城市规划,2021(6):15-21.
郑兴明.基于分类推进的乡村振兴潜力评价指标体系研究:来自福建省3县市6个村庄的调查数据[J].社会科学,2019(6):36-47.
张丽,周国华,刘李勇,等.湖南省乡村发展潜力评价及其障碍度诊断[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2022,45(2):1-11.
马力阳,罗其友,李同昇,等.半干旱区水资源—乡村发展耦合协调评价与实证研究:以通辽市为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(9):152-159.
王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
蒲金芳,王亚楠,张蚌蚌,等.赣东山地丘陵区土地利用多功能与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(4):256-269.
冯丹玥,金晓斌,梁鑫源,等.基于“类型—等级—潜力”综合视角的村庄特征识别与整治对策[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(8):226-237.
么泽恩,蔡海生,张学玲,等.基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的浮梁县土地生态安全时空分异及其障碍因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(10):2452-2463.
刘淑茹,魏晓晓.基于改进CRITIC法的西部地区新型城镇化水平测度[J].生态经济,2019,35(7):98-102.
李裕瑞,卜长利,曹智,等.面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(2):243-256.
0
浏览量
631
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621