1. 南开大学 环境科学与工程学院,天津,300350
2. 天津市跨介质复合污染环境 治理技术重点实验室,天津,300350
3. 天津师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,天津,300387
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
杜志博, 陈晓琴, 李洪远, 等. 渤海湾海陆统筹生态安全屏障构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):124-132.
Du Zhibo, Chen Xiaoqin, Li Hongyuan, et al. Construction of an Ecological Security Barrier for Sea and Land in Bohai Bay[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 124-132.
杜志博, 陈晓琴, 李洪远, 等. 渤海湾海陆统筹生态安全屏障构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):124-132. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.015.
Du Zhibo, Chen Xiaoqin, Li Hongyuan, et al. Construction of an Ecological Security Barrier for Sea and Land in Bohai Bay[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 124-132. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.015.
[目的] 构建正向、负向作用区域相结合的生态屏障区,以充分实现生态屏障的保护、防御目标,为科学规划、实施生态屏障区分目标和差异化管理提供参考。[方法] 以渤海湾生态系统为研究区域,通过水鸟多样性热点分析、生态系统服务价值评估、近岸海域生态系统质量评价得出正向、负向作用区域,结合各省份海洋保护规划目标,构建渤海湾海陆统筹生态安全屏障。[结果] ①水鸟多样性热点区域位于沿海滩涂、湿地和水体生态系统,冷点区域位于建设用地和耕地等频繁受人类活动影响的区域。生态系统服务价值由北向南呈现增加的趋势,其中水源涵养功能服务价值量最高。 ②近岸海域海水环境质量整体向好,但仍存在富营养化严重、赤潮等海洋灾害频发地点;由北向南,海洋环境承载能力逐渐下降、海洋渔业开发强度逐渐上升。 ③生态安全屏障共包括16个区域,其中正向作用区域11个,负向作用区域5个,主要位于近海一侧陆海交汇处,整体大致呈现间隔分布的特征。[结论] 以生态屏障为指导开展规划管理、生态治理工作,正向作用区域、负向作用区域分别以实现保护目标、防御目标为宗旨,促进海陆一体化生态文明建设。
[Objective] An ecological barrier area that combined positive and negative action areas was constructed to fully realize the protection and defense goals of an ecological barrier in order to provide a reference for scientific planning and implementation of ecological barrier distinction goals and differentiated management. [Methods] Positive and negative effect areas for the Bohai Bay ecosystem were extracted based on a hotspot analysis of waterbird diversity
ecosystem service value assessment
and ecosystem quality evaluation of the nearshore marine ecosystem. In combination with the marine protection planning objectives of each province
the Bohai Bay sea-land coordinated ecological security barrier was finally constructed. [Results] ① The hotspots of waterbird diversity were located in coastal mudflats
wetlands
and water ecosystems. The cold spots were located in areas frequently affected by human activities such as construction land and cultivated land. The ecosystem service value showed an increasing trend from north to south
and the service value of the water conservation function was the highest. ② The overall quality of the near-shore seawater environment was improving
but there were still places with frequent marine disasters such as severe eutrophication and red tides. From north to south
the carrying capacity of the marine environment gradually decreased
and the intensity of marine fishery development slowly increased. ③ The ecological security barrier area consisted of 16 areas
including 11 positive-acting areas and five negative-acting areas. These areas were mainly located at the land-sea intersection on the offshore side
and generally presented the characteristics of interval distribution. [Conclusion] The ecological barrier will be used as a guide to carry out planning and management and ecological governance. The positive-acting areas are aimed at achieving the protection goal
and the negative-acting areas are aimed at attaining the defense goal so as to promote the construction of an integrated ecological civilization on sea and land.
Chaturvedi R, Favas P J, Pratas J, et al. Metal(loid) induced toxicity and defense mechanisms in
Spinacia oleracea
L.: Ecological hazard and Prospects for phytoremediation [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019,183:109570.
Larin D S, Bondarenko V L, Skorikova E A. Assessment of ecological safety in zones of influence of water intake technological complex of multipurpose water supply systems [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019,272(2):022226.
巩杰,燕玲玲,徐彩仙,等.近30年来中美生态系统服务研究热点对比分析: 基于文献计量研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3537-3547.
Jung M, Arnell A, de Lamo X, et al. Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution,2021,5(11):1499-1509.
Raw J L, Adams J B, Bornman T G, et al. Vulnerability to sea-level rise and the potential for restoration to enhance blue carbon storage in salt marshes of an urban estuary [J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2021,260:107495.
胡秋红,丛楠,殷国栋.典型生态屏障区生态安全格局构建:以承德市为例[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(9):2914-2926.
王耕,周腾禹.基于文献计量分析的区域生态安全研究热点与趋势[J].生态学报,2019,39(18):6950-6957.
王玉华,高学磊,白力军,等.内蒙古北方生态安全屏障建设研究[J].环境与发展,2019,31(9):202-205.
张倩倩.浅析如何构筑生物多样性保护屏障: 以塞罕坝自然保护区为例[J].安徽农学通报,2021,27(16):86-87.
Zhang Jinxin, Cao Yunmeng, Ding Fanshu, et al. Regional ecological security pattern construction based on ecological barriers: A case study of the Bohai Bay terrestrial ecosystem [J]. Sustainability,2022,14(9):5384.
曹洪军,谢云飞.渤海海洋生态安全屏障构建问题研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2021(1):21-31.
宝音,包玉海,阿拉腾图雅,等.内蒙古生态屏障建设与保护[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(3):62-65.
杨冬生.论建设长江上游生态屏障[J].四川林业科技,2002,23(1):1-6.
Yu Zhilei, Qin Tianling, Yan Dengming, et al. The impact on the ecosystem services value of the ecological shelter zone reconstruction in the upper reaches basin of the Yangtze River in China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2018,15(10):2273.
蒋蕾,韩维峥,孙丽娜.基于景观生态风险的区域生态屏障建设研究[J].国土资源遥感,2020,32(4):219-226.
赵宁.基于InVEST模型的渤海湾沿岸土地系统碳储量及生境质量评估[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2020.
孟影,马姜明,王永琪,等.基于Maxent模型的檵木分布格局模拟[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8287-8296.
季乾昭,王荣兴,黄志旁,等.样本量与研究范围变化对MaxEnt模型准确度的影响: 以黑白仰鼻猴为例[J].兽类学报,2019,39(2):126-133.
李美玲.气候变化下马可波罗盘羊的环境适应性及生境廊道识别[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2019.
罗绮琪,胡慧建,徐正春,等.基于Maxent模型的粤港澳大湾区水鸟多样性热点研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7589-7598.
徐丽芬,许学工,罗涛,等.基于土地利用的生态系统服务价值当量修订方法: 以渤海湾沿岸为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(10):1775-1784.
王彦芳.京津冀地区生态系统服务价值估算与分析[J].环境保护与循环经济,2017,37(7):50-54.
高源,王钧丹.环渤海地区海洋渔业生态系统脆弱性的时空演变及影响因素分析[J].经济论坛,2020(4):95-102.
赵冬至,赵玲,张丰收.我国海域赤潮灾害的类型、分布与变化趋势[J].海洋环境科学,2003,22(3):7-11.
常咏梅.黄河流域豫鲁段景观生态安全格局研究[D].山东济南:山东建筑大学,2021.
侯亚琼.天津市海岸带生态安全评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2018.
穆泳林,梁晨,李晓文,等.基于系统保护规划的海河流域湿地保护优先格局与保护空缺识别[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):3836-3845.
曲方圆,李淑芸,赵林林,等.黄海生态区保护空缺分析[J].生物多样性,2021,29(3):385-393.
0
浏览量
693
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621