1. 重庆三峡学院 土木工程学院,重庆,404100
2. 山西农业大学 城乡建设学院,山西,太原,030000
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
谷易, 毛海涛, 何涛, 等. 三峡库区紫色土渗流—应力的耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):44-51.
Gu Yi, Mao Haitao, He Tao, et al. Coupling Relationship Between Seepage and Stress of Purple Soil in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 44-51.
谷易, 毛海涛, 何涛, 等. 三峡库区紫色土渗流—应力的耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):44-51. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.006.
Gu Yi, Mao Haitao, He Tao, et al. Coupling Relationship Between Seepage and Stress of Purple Soil in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 44-51. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.006.
[目的] 研究三峡库区紫色土在渗流与应力耦合作用下的渗透特性和抗剪强度特性,深入探究紫色土应力—渗流的耦合关系,为农业工程、边坡工程、水土保持等实际工程应用提供理论参考。[方法] 以三峡库区紫色土为研究对象,借助SLB-1A型应力应变控制式三轴剪切渗透试验仪,分析多因素耦合对紫色土抗剪强度特性和渗透性的变化。[结果] 含水率对三峡库区紫色土的黏聚力c与内摩擦角φ的影响程度不同,并在含水率为11%处取得峰值,内摩擦角随含水率增大而减小,二者变化趋势符合线性变化的特征;紫色土渗透性的变化在不同含水率梯度间存在较大的差异性,且含水率在11%~13%之间时差异性相对显著;以渗透压等于40 kPa为临界值,紫色土的渗透性降低形式不同;主应力差控制值越大,不同含水率紫色土的渗透性降低越显著。[结论] 渗透—剪切作用下,含水率和围压极大影响了紫色土的抗剪强度,其黏聚力在含水率11%处取得峰值,黏聚力和内摩擦角的变化符合线性变化;相同条件下,主应力差控制值越大,不同含水率紫色土的渗透性降低越显著,主应力差的贡献率高于含水率。各因素对影响紫色土渗透性的贡献率由高到低依次为:渗透压>主应力差>围压>含水率。
[Objective] The permeability and shear strength characteristics of purple soil in the Three Gorges reservoir area under the coupling effect of seepage and stress were studied
and the coupling relationship between stress and seepage of purple soil was deeply explored
in order to provide theoretical reference for practical engineering applications such as agricultural engineering
slope engineering and soil and water conservation. [Methods] Changes in shear strength and permeability of purple soil under multi-factor coupling were analyzed using an SLB-1A stress-strain controlled triaxial shear permeability tester. [Results] The influence of water content on cohesion (c) and internal friction angle (φ) of purple soil in the Three Gorges reservoir area was different
and the peak value was obtained at the water content of 11%. The internal friction angle decreased linearly with increasing water content. The permeability of purple soil varied greatly among different water content gradients
and the differences were relatively obvious when the water contents were between 11% and 13%. With the permeability pressure equal to the critical value of 40 kPa
the permeability reduction forms of purple soil were different. The greater the control value of the principal stress difference
the lower the permeability of purple soil with different moisture contents. [Conclusion] Water content and confining pressure greatly affected the shear strength of purple soil under the action of seepage-shear. Cohesion reached a peak value at 11% water content
and the changes of cohesion and internal friction angle were linear. Under the same conditions
the influence of water content and principal stress difference on the permeability coefficient of purple soil with axial stress followed a cubic relationship. The contribution rates of various factors to the permeability of purple soil from high to low followed the order of permeability pressure > principal stress difference > confining pressure > water content.
汪明星.重庆山地丘陵区紫色土饱和导水率传递函数研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2017.
黄海均,毛海涛,严新军,等.三峡库区高边坡紫色土抗剪强度的水敏性特征[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2020,40(6):974-983.
吕刚,史东梅.三峡库区紫色土土壤水分入渗特性研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2009,28(6):87-90.
薛乐,汪时机,李贤,等.重庆紫色土抗侵蚀能力的粒组效应研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(3):582-591.
张健乐,史东梅,刘义,等.土壤容重和含水率对紫色土坡耕地耕层抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):162-167.
Wang Zhengcheng, Zhang Shixin, Mao Haitao, et al. Experimental study on the disintegration mechanism of consolidated purple soil in Three Gorges Reservoir area of China [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022,15(6):1-14.
钟茫.非饱和紫色土抗剪强度影响因素研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
李妍,彭义.干湿循环条件下紫色土抗剪强度与膨胀率研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,40(4):70-73.
倪九派,袁天泽,高明,等.土壤干密度和含水率对2种紫色土抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):72-77.
胡斐南,魏朝富,许晨阳,等.紫色土区水稻土抗剪强度的水敏性特征[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(3):107-114.
史炳林.紫色土坡耕地埂坎土壤抗剪特征研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2017.
郭进,文安邦,严冬春,等.三峡库区紫色土坡地土壤颗粒流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):18-21.
李江文,冉卓灵,韩珍,等.含岩屑紫色土水分扩散规律[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):178-185.
孙丽丽,査轩,黄少燕,等.不同降雨强度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):18-23.
夏振尧,张伦,牛鹏辉,等.干密度初始含水率坡度对紫色土崩解特性的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(1):121-127.
王文武.不同坡度下紫色土坡耕地土壤侵蚀演变特征[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2019.
李达,汪时机,李贤,等.非饱和砂质黏性紫色土一维渗透特性试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(2):373-380.
宁宝宽,王宇旸,陈四利,等.水泥尾矿砂土的应力渗流耦合特性试验[J].水文地质工程地质,2015,42(4):74-78.
Lili M, Bralts V, Yinghua P, et al. Methods for measuring soil infiltration: State of the art [J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2008,1(1):22-30.
谢君,杜静,刘芸.重庆紫色土硼的有效性及其影响因素分析[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,36(2):153-157.
周萍,文安邦,严冬春,等.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(3):1-6.
王晓菊,毛海涛,黄庆豪,等.基于Copula函数的三峡库区万州段蓄水前后降雨量—径流量关系分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2021,32(2):23-30.
中华人民共和国水利部.GB/T 50123-2019土工试验方法标准[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2019.
常松果.红壤坡耕地耕层土壤抗剪强度及影响因素响应特征[D].重庆:西南大学,2017.
梁广川.不同因素对重庆紫色土土—水特征曲线的影响研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2020.
程鹏,李锦辉,宋磊.生态边坡的水力和力学特性分析:试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(10):1901-1907.
韦杰,史炳林,李进林.紫色土坡耕地埂坎土壤抗剪性能对含水率的响应[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(20):153-160.
梁广川,汪时机,李贤,等.砂质黏性紫色土渗透特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(S2):220-224.
0
浏览量
577
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621