林草植被恢复类型对黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的影响

帕力夏提·格明; 王龙; 徐学选; 王维维; 张连科; 李梦瑶; Farhat Ullah Khan; 杜锋

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

林草植被恢复类型对黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的影响

试验研究

- 林草植被恢复类型对黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的影响
- Effects of Forest and Grass Restoration Types on Aggregate Stability and Infiltration Characteristics of Loess
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第1期页码：24-31
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 甘肃省科学院地质自然灾害防治研究所,甘肃,兰州,730000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“黄土丘陵区土壤斥水性及其对降水入渗机制的影响研究”(41977426);“植物根系构型与力学特性对黄土区浅层坡体稳定性的影响”(41771322);甘肃省科学院应用研究与开发项目“马兰黄土边坡土壤侵蚀降雨模拟研究”(2019-JK-07)。
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.004
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
帕力夏提·格明, 王龙, 徐学选, 等. 林草植被恢复类型对黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):24-31.

Palixiati·Geming, Wang Long, Xu Xuexuan, et al. Effects of Forest and Grass Restoration Types on Aggregate Stability and Infiltration Characteristics of Loess[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 24-31.
帕力夏提·格明, 王龙, 徐学选, 等. 林草植被恢复类型对黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):24-31. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.004.

Palixiati·Geming, Wang Long, Xu Xuexuan, et al. Effects of Forest and Grass Restoration Types on Aggregate Stability and Infiltration Characteristics of Loess[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 24-31. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.004.

摘要

[目的

]

对比不同林草植被恢复类型下黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性的差异，为黄土高原地区生态恢复模式的合理优化提供理论支持。[方法

]

以黄土区撂荒地(C

，对照)、苜蓿地(C

)、天然草地(C

)、油松+侧柏混交林(L

)、刺槐+侧柏混交林(L

)为对象，采用萨维诺夫法和单环双水头法分别测定了水稳性团聚体组成状况、饱和导水率(K

)。以平均质量直径(MWD)、几何直径(GMD)、颗粒分形维数(D)、破坏率(PAD)、＞0.25 mm水稳性团聚体占比(M

)和饱和导水率为评价指标，分析了不同林草植被恢复类型的土壤团聚体稳定性和入渗特性差异及其影响因素。[结果

]

①0—30 cm土层范围内，C

的GMD和MWD最低，林草植被恢复类型的GMD，MWD表现为L

和C

＞L

和C

，而PAD和D则相反。 ②0—10 cm土层，L

的＞0.25 mm水稳定团聚体含量最高(47.24%)，其次是C

和L

，C

最低(24.00%)；而10—30 cm土层，C

的＞0.25 mm水稳定团聚体含量最高(10—20 cm处为35.41%，20—30 cm处为27.96%)，L

最低(10—20 cm处为11.46%，20—30 cm处为8.00%)。 ③不同林草植被恢复类型的表层土壤入渗特性变异系数均介于0.001～0.360，L

的K

(0.307 cm/min)最大，C

的K

(0.044 cm/min)最小。 ④团聚体稳定性指标(PAD除外)和K

均与有机质、孔隙度、容重呈现显著或极显著相关。[结论

]

林草植被恢复有助于改善黄土团聚体稳定性和入渗特性，长期林地恢复类型(L

)的团聚体稳定性和入渗特性优于天然草地(C

)，而短期林地恢复类型(L

)却不如天然草地(C

)，植被恢复应注重时间的积累。

Abstract

[Objective] The differences in aggregate stability and infiltration characteristics of loess under different forest and grass vegetation restoration types were compared in order to provide a theoretical basis for the optimization of ecological restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau. [Methods] Abandoned land (C1

control)

alfalfa land (C2)

natural grassland (C3)

mixed forest land of Pinus tabuliformis and Platycladus orientalis (L1)

and mixed forest land of Robinia pseudoacacia and P. orientalis (L2) were used to investigate differences in aggregate stability and infiltration characteristics and their exogenous factors. Water-stable aggregate composition and saturated hydraulic conductivity were determined by the Savinov method and a single-ring two-ponding depth infiltrometer

respectively. Mean weight diameter (MWD)

geometric mean diameter (GMD)

fractal dimension (D)

percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD)

water-stable macroaggregate content (＞0.25 mm

Mw)

and saturated hydraulic conductivity sample (Ks) were used as evaluation indicators. [Results] ① In the 0—30 cm soil layer

C1 had the lowest GMD and MWD

and GMD and MWD in forest and grass vegetation restoration types followed the order of 〔L1 and C3〕＞〔L2 and C2〕

respectively

whereas PAD and D showed the opposite order. ② In the 0—10 cm soil layer

L1 dominated the highest macroaggregate (＞0.25 mm) content (47.24%)

followed by C3 and L2

while C1 had the lowest content (24.00%). In the 10—30 cm soil layer

C3 dominated the highest macroaggregate (＞0.25 mm) content (35.41% at 10—20 cm; 27.96% at 20—30 cm)

while L2 had the lowest content (11.46% at 10—20 cm; 8.00% at 20—30 cm). ③ The variation coefficients of topsoil infiltration characteristics for different restoration types ranged from 0.001 to 0.360. The Ks (0.307 cm/min) of L1 was the highest

while the Ks (0.044 cm/min) of C1 was the lowest. ④ Aggregate stability indicators (except PAD) and Ks were significantly correlated with soil organic carbon

porosity

and bulk density. [Conclusion] The restoration of forest and grass vegetation was beneficial for improving aggregate stability and infiltration performance. Compared with natural grassland

long-term forest restoration exhibited better aggregate stability and infiltration characteristics

but those characteristics were worse for short-term forest restoration than for natural grassland. Time accumulation should be emphasized when evaluating the effects of vegetation restoration.

关键词

Keywords

references

高云飞,张栋,赵帮元,等.1990—2019年黄河流域水土流失动态变化分析[J].中国水土保持,2020(10):64-67.

张雅茜,方晰,冼应男,等.亚热带区4种林地土壤微生物生物量碳氮磷及酶活性特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(14):5326-5338.

Nsabimana G, Bao Yuhai, He Xiubin, et al. Soil aggregate stability response to hydraulic conditions in water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China [J]. Catena, 2021,204:105387.

胡昭,张懿,郭建.黄土丘陵区典型林地土壤团聚体稳定性评价[J].人民黄河,2020,42(8):104-108.

王紫薇,邵明安,黄来明,等.青海省东部不同土地利用方式下土壤饱和导水率分布及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):150-155.

冯璐.黄土丘陵沟壑区撂荒草地土壤性质变化特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.

海龙,姚拓,张春红,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同年限苜蓿地土壤水稳性团聚体分布特征及稳定性研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(5):51-56.

陈文媛,张少妮,华瑞,等.黄土丘陵区林草恢复进程中土壤入渗特征研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2017,39(1):62-69.

Liu Yifan, Liu Yu, Shi Zhihua, et al. Effectiveness of re-vegetated forest and grassland on soil erosion control in the semi-arid Loess Plateau [J]. Catena, 2020,195:104787.

Zeng Quanchao, Darboux F, Man Cheng, et al. Soil aggregate stability under different rain conditions for three vegetation types on the Loess Plateau (China) [J]. Catena, 2018,167:276-283.

赵克昌,屈连宝.兰州南北两山植被恢复策略[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(3):493-497.

李娟.基于GIS和RS的兰州市南北两山植被覆盖动态变化研究[D].甘肃兰州:西北师范大学,2009.

王润泽,谌芸,李铁,等.紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带土壤团聚体稳定性特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):210-216.

邱陆旸,张丽萍,陆芳春,等.基于熵权法的林下土壤抗蚀性评价及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):74-79.

Nimmo J R, Schmidt K M, Perkins K S, et al. Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization [J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2009,8(1):142-149.

陈文媛,徐学选,华瑞,等.黄土丘陵区林草退耕年限对土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(4):1486-1492.

白秀梅,韩有志,郭汉清.关帝山不同植被恢复类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):79-84.

Abbas F, Zhu Zhaolong, An Shaoshan. Evaluating aggregate stability of soils under different plant species in Ziwuling Mountain area using three renowned methods [J]. Catena, 2021,207:105616.

Wu Xinliang, Cai Chongfa, Wang Junguang, et al. Spatial variations of aggregate stability in relation to sesquioxides for zonal soils, South-central China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016,157:11-22.

王辉,王全九,邵明安.表层土壤容重对黄土坡面养分随径流迁移的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):10-13.

刘旦旦,张鹏辉,王健,等.黄土坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性对比[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):102-106.

李阳芳,宋维峰,和俊,等.元阳梯田核心区不同土地利用类型土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):54-57.

杨振奇,郭建英,秦富仓,等.裸露砒砂岩区不同植被类型土壤团聚体稳定性与抗蚀性能[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):8-14.

刘畅,张建军,张海博,等.晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):101-107.

刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸.土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1209-1218.

浏览量

577

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同恢复措施对新疆伊犁退化草地植被特征及多样性的影响

毛乌素沙地固沙林恢复土壤矿物颗粒固定碳氮效应及机制

黄土高原植被恢复过程中土壤碳固存变化及其驱动因素

黄土丘陵区植被恢复与流域养分环境演变研究进展

黄土丘陵区退耕坡地植被自然恢复过程及其对土壤入渗的影响