1. 东华理工大学 江西省软科学研究培育基地资源与环境战略研究中心,江西,南昌,330013
2. 东华理工大学 测绘工程学院,江西,南昌,330013
3. 自然资源部 环鄱阳湖区域矿山环境监测与治理重点实验室,江西,南昌,330013
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
谷瑞丽, 多玲花, 邹自力, 等. 黄河下游城市群生态系统健康时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):285-292.
Gu Ruili, Duo Linghua, Zou Zili, et al. Spatial and Temporal Evolutionary Characteristics of Ecosystem Health at Urban Agglomeration in Lower Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 285-292.
谷瑞丽, 多玲花, 邹自力, 等. 黄河下游城市群生态系统健康时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):285-292. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221114.001.
Gu Ruili, Duo Linghua, Zou Zili, et al. Spatial and Temporal Evolutionary Characteristics of Ecosystem Health at Urban Agglomeration in Lower Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 285-292. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221114.001.
[目的] 研究城市土地扩张对黄河下游城市群生态系统健康的影响,并构建科学的生态系统健康评价模型以识别生态系统健康状态时空演变特征,为制定有效生态保护策略提供前提条件。 [方法] 以黄河下游城市群为研究区,构建VORS评价模型,以格网为研究单元对2000,2010和2020年黄河下游城市群生态系统健康水平进行动态评价。 [结果] ①2000-2020年,生态系统健康指数平均值从2000年的0.325下降到2020年的0.320,标准差从2000年的0.106上升到2020年的0.112。这表明研究区生态系统健康水平总体上呈现略微降低的趋势,生态系统健康等级高的地区更加健康,而等级低的地区生态系统不断恶化。 ②研究区生态系统健康水平空间异质性显著,各等级空间分布集中,从研究区中部延伸到东北部的大部分区域,生态系统健康程度表现为较差,占比高达约74%,整体生态系统健康水平脆弱。 ③2000,2010和2020年全局莫兰指数分别为0.512,0.522和0.543。这表明研究区生态系统健康分布在整体上具有正向的空间集聚效应,空间依赖性显著。 [结论] 黄河下游城市群生态系统健康水平整体上有所降低,生态系统健康状况不容乐观,生态环境保护与建设亟待加强,未来应着重于提高生态系统服务水平。
[Objective] Effects of urban land expansion on the ecosystem health of urban agglomeration in the lower Yellow River basin were studed. A scientific ecosystem health evaluation model was constructed to identify the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the ecosystem health status
in order to provide the prerequisite for formulating effective ecological protection strategies. [Methods] The VORS model was developed with urban agglomeration in the lower Yellow River basin as the study region
and the grid was used as the study unit to dynamically assess the ecosystem health of the urban agglomeration in 2000
2010 and 2020. [Results] ① From 2000 to 2020
the mean ecosystem health index decreased from 0.325 in 2000 to 0.320 in 2020
and the standard deviation increased from 0.106 in 2000 to 0.112 in 2020
the health level of the ecosystem in the study area generally showed a slightly decreasing trend. Areas with high levels of ecosystem health were healthier
while those with low levels were deteriorating. ② The spatial heterogeneity of the ecosystem health level in the study area was significant
and the spatial distribution of all levels was concentrated. In most areas extending from the middle of the study area to the northeast
the ecosystem health level was poor
accounting for up to about 74%
and the overall ecosystem health level was fragile. ③ The Moran’s I was 0.512
0.522 and 0.543 in 2000
2010 and 2020
respectively. The overall distribution of ecosystem health in the study area had a positive spatial agglomeration effect
with significant spatial dependence. [Conclusion] The overall level of ecosystem health in the urban agglomeration of lower Yellow River basin has decreased
the ecosystem health is not optimistic
ecological environmental protection and construction need to be strengthened
and in the future
people should focus on improving the level of ecosystem services.
Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J. Assessing ecosystem health[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1998,13(10):397-402.
宁立新,梁晓瑶,程昌秀.京津冀地区生态系统健康评估及时空变化[J].生态科学,2021,40(6):1-12.
牛明香,王俊,徐宾铎.基于PSR的黄河河口区生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2017,37(3):943-952.
徐辉,丁祖栋,武玲玲.黄河下游沿黄城市生态系统健康评价[J].人民黄河,2022,44(2):12-15,20.
刘玒玒,汪妮,解建仓,等.基于熵权法的城市生态系统健康模糊评价[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2014,47(6):755-759.
惠婷婷.生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].环境保护与循环经济,2020,40(2):52-54.
彭建,王仰麟,吴健生,等.区域生态系统健康评价:研究方法与进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4877-4885.
周钰,王亮,李西灿,等.基于生态足迹的格网化生态承载力评价:以衡水市为例[J].测绘通报,2020(6):93-98.
陈万旭,赵雪莲,钟明星,等.长江中游城市群生态系统健康时空演变特征分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(1):138-149.
刘焱序,彭建,汪安,等.生态系统健康研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(18):5920-5930.
袁毛宁,刘焱序,王曼,等.基于"活力-组织力-恢复力-贡献力"框架的广州市生态系统健康评估[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1249-1257.
方创琳.黄河流域城市群形成发育的空间组织格局与高质量发展[J].经济地理,2020,40(6):1-8.
王家耀,秦奋,郭建忠.建设黄河"智能大脑"服务流域生态保护和高质量发展[J].测绘通报,2021(10):1-8.
刘建华,王明照.黄河下游城市群创新能力的空间演变及其影响因素[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,53(2):55-60.
张诗嘉,杜书云,刘晓英,等.黄河下游城市群土地利用生态效率时空差异及影响因素研究[J].资源开发与市场,2022,38(3):280-289.
司晓君,崔佳.中原城市群"三生"用地转型及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):284-290.
Peng Jian, Liu Yanxu, Li Tianyi, et al. Regional ecosystem health response to rural land use change:A case study in Lijiang City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,72:399-410.
宫照,栗敏光.青藏高原生态屏障区自然生态状况评价方法研究[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2020,43(11):88-92,95.
李翠漫.钦州湾海岸带景观格局时空演变及生态系统健康评价[D].广西 南宁:南宁师范大学,2019.
欧阳晓,朱翔,贺清云.基于生态系统服务和生态系统健康的生态风险评价:以长株潭城市群为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5478-5489.
欧维新,张伦嘉,陶宇,等.基于土地利用变化的长三角生态系统健康时空动态研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):84-92.
杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.黄河流域生境质量时空演变及其影响因素[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(4):12-22.
王超,常勇,侯西勇,等.基于土地利用格局变化的胶东半岛生境质量时空演变特征研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2021,23(10):1809-1822.
贾艳艳,王少杰,刘福胜,等.黄河三角洲高效生态经济区土地利用变化及其与生境质量的相关性[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):213-220,227,330.
Xu Wenbin, He Mengxuan, Meng Weiqing, et al. Temporal-spatial change of China's coastal ecosystems health and driving factors analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,845:157319.
杨倩.基于土地利用的江苏省市县生态系统健康评估研究[D].江苏 南京:南京大学,2020.
谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
王颖慧,丁建丽,李晓航,等.伊犁河流域LUCC对生态系统服务价值的影响:基于强度分析模型[J].生态学报,2022,42(8):3108-3116.
丁梦婷,裴凤松,胡引翠,等.基于LUCC的江苏省生态系统服务价值时空变化特征研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(19):6801-6811.
雷军成,王莎,汪金梅,等.土地利用变化对寻乌县生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(9):3089-3099.
Ren Yating, Zhang Feng, Li Jiapeng, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on AHP-DPSR model and impacts of climate change and human disturbances:A case study of Liaohe River Basin in Jilin Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,142:109171.
湛东升,吴倩倩,余建辉,等.中国资源型城市房价时空变化与影响因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(12):2888-2900.
Yushanjiang Ayinuer, Zhang Fei, Tan Mou Leong. Spatial-temporal characteristics of ecosystem health in Central Asia[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2021,105:102635.
刘一鸣,徐煖银,曾辉.中国东海海岸带地区生态系统健康评估及其尺度依赖性[J].生态学报,2022,42(24).
0
浏览量
572
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621