晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征

梁秀琴; 冯强; 段宝玲

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221107.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征

试验研究

- 晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征
- Spatial Coupling Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Residents’ Well- Being at Mining Area of Loess Plateau in Western Shanxi Province
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第6期页码：400-408
- 作者机构：
  
  山西财经大学资源环境学院,山西,太原,030006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"基于权衡特征的黄河中游生态系统服务供需调控策略研究:资源均衡与福祉公平视角"(22YJAZH018);山西省基础研究计划资助项目(20210302123481);地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室开放课题(2022-KF-02)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221107.001
  中图分类号： F062.2;X171.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梁秀琴, 冯强, 段宝玲. 晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):400-408.

Liang Xiuqin, Feng Qiang, Duan Baoling. Spatial Coupling Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Residents’ Well- Being at Mining Area of Loess Plateau in Western Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 400-408.
梁秀琴, 冯强, 段宝玲. 晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):400-408. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221107.001.

Liang Xiuqin, Feng Qiang, Duan Baoling. Spatial Coupling Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Residents’ Well- Being at Mining Area of Loess Plateau in Western Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 400-408. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221107.001.

摘要

[目的] 探析晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合关系，为推进资源密集地区生态环境与居民福祉协调发展提供科学依据。[方法] 以晋西三川河流域街镇为研究单元，利用问卷调查、当量因子法、耦合协调度和地理探测器模型刻画该流域2020年生态系统服务和居民福祉的耦合度及耦合协调度空间特征，并分析其驱动因子。 [结果] ① 生态系统服务价值呈现“东高西低”的空间格局，东西差异明显。 ②居民福祉水平总体呈现“中部低，东西高”的空间特征。 ③耦合协调度空间分布呈现“东高西低”的特征，以协调状态为主，其中良好协调比例58.9%。 ④耦合协调度在空间上的差异受多种因子的影响，其中土地利用程度、植被覆盖度和年均降水量是耦合协调度空间分异的主要影响因子，且植被覆盖度、土地利用程度与其他因子的交互作用对耦合协调度的影响显著。 [结论] 三川河流域生态系统服务与居民福祉空间耦合特征差异明显，主导影响因子为植被状况，未来需整体科学规划生态空间，重点关注流域中西部绿色开发和生态修复工作，同时切实提升居民福祉水平。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial coupling relationship between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being at mining area in the Western Shanxi Loess Plateau was studied in order to provide support for promoting the coordinated development of ecological environment and residents’ well-being in resource-intensive areas. [Methods] We took towns in Sanchuan River basin in Western Shanxi Province as the research units

and applied questionnaire survey

equivalent factor method

coupling coordination degree and geographic detector model to describe the spatial characteristics of coupling degree and coordination degree of ecosystem services and residents’ well-being of the basin in 2020

and to explore its driving factors. [Results] ① The spatial pattern of ecosystem service value showed high in the east and low in the west with obvious difference between the east and the west. ② The spatial pattern of residents’ well-being showed low in the middle and high in the east and west. ③ The spatial distribution of coupling coordination degree showed a feature of high in the east and low in the west with coordination state being the main factor

good coordination accounted for 58.9%. ④ The spatial difference of coupling coordination degree was affected by many factors

among which land use degree

vegetation cover degree and average annual precipitation were the main influencing factors

and the interaction between vegetation cover degree

land use degree and other factors had a greater impact on the coupling coordination degree. [Conclusion] The spatial coupling characteristics of ecosystem services and residents’ well-being in Sanchuan River basin are obviously different

and the dominant influencing factor is vegetation status. In the future

it is necessary to plan ecological space scientifically

focus on green development and ecological restoration in the central and western parts of the basin

and effectively improve residents’ well-being.

关键词

Keywords

references

Rey-Valette H, Blayac T, Salles J M. Evaluating the contribution of nature to well-being:The case of ecosystem services related to fish-farming ponds in France[J]. Ecological Economics, 2022,191:107217.

邱坚坚,刘毅华,袁利,等.人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(6):1060-1072.

李成,赵洁.长三角城市群生态系统服务供需格局与影响因素研究[J].生态经济,2022,38(9):160-169,187.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 2005.

联合国.改变我们的世界:2030年可持续发展议程[EB/OL].(2015-07-06)[2022-12-06]. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9814.

高吉喜,李广宇,张怡,等."十四五"生态环境保护目标、任务与实现路径分析[J].环境保护,2021,49(2):45-51.

郭宗亮,刘亚楠,张璐,等.生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):928-936.

乔旭宁,张婷,杨永菊,等.渭干河流域生态系统服务的空间溢出及对居民福祉的影响[J].资源科学,2017,39(3):533-544.

Breslow S J, Sojka B, Barnea R, et al. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016,66:250-259.

熊鹰,侯珂伦,郑偲睿,等.基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系:以广东省乐昌市为例[J].热带地理,2020,40(5):843-855.

Ma Li, Qin Yueting, Zhang Han, et al. Improving well-being of farmers using ecological awareness around protected areas:Evidence from Qinling Region, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(18):9792.

杨雪婷,邱孝枰,徐云,等.典型山区生态系统服务对居民福祉影响的空间差异及动态特征:以川西山区为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7555-7567.

Summers J K, Smith L M, Case J L, et al. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services[J]. Ambio, 2012,41(4):327-340.

刘家根,黄璐,严力蛟.生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响:以浙江省桐庐县为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(5):1687-1697.

朱相君,薛亮.关中地区生态系统服务价值变化及其与经济发展耦合关系[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(4):769-776.

谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.

朱杰,卢春天,石金莲,等.自然保护区居民福祉的历时性:以陕西佛坪国家级自然保护区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(22):8299-8309.

Bardram J E. Temporal coordination-on time and coordination of collaborative activities at a surgical department[J]. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2000,9(2):157-187.

罗盛锋,孟淑云,黄燕玲.民族地区生态系统与旅游、乡村社会发展系统的时空耦合研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):135-144.

董林玉,张霖,张翔.我国新型城镇化与医疗服务水平耦合协调度及空间相关性分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2022,39(1):4-9.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

罗紫元,曾坚.资源环境保护下天津市用地空间增长模拟[J].地理研究,2022,41(2):341-357.

Liu Ranran, Dong Xiaobin, Wang Xuechao, et al. Study on the relationship among the urbanization process, ecosystem services and human well-being in an arid region in the context of carbon flow:Taking the Manas river basin as an example[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,132:108248.

范在予,易筱雅,耿虹.黄河三角洲生态效率与城镇化效率的时空耦合研究:基于2008-2017年面板数据的实证分析[J].城市问题,2021,40(3):17-28.

周润芳,孙建国,张卓.甘肃省榆中县地形对耕地分布影响[J].遥感信息,2020,35(4):148-154.

Wang Bojie, Tang Haiping, Xu Ying. Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices:Insights from a mountain-basin area, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,27(6):58-69.

吴建寨,李波,张新时.生态系统服务价值变化在生态经济协调发展评价中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(11):2554-2558.

霍冉,徐向阳,高俊莲,等.煤炭资源型城市生态系统服务空间特征及其与居民福祉关系[J].土壤通报,2020,51(1):31-39.

Adams H, Adger W N, Ahmad S, et al. Multi-dimensional well-being associated with economic dependence on ecosystem services in deltaic social-ecological systems of Bangladesh[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2020,20(2):42.

胡蕾,吴健,李海萍.生态系统服务与居民收入的耦合关系及影响因素:以丽江拉市海流域为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(18):6402-6411.

Zhang Zhengfeng, Wang Mengwei, Xu Ze, et al. The influence of Community Sports Parks on residents' subjective well-being:A case study of Zhuhai City, China[J]. Habitat International, 2021,117:102439.

李昂,米长虹,杨琰瑛,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务与居民福祉时空分异及耦合协调关系[J/OL].生态经济,2022(2022-07-27)[2022-12-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/53.1193.F.20220726.1814.013.html

郭力娜,王刚,姜广辉,等.2005-2019年辽宁省城镇化与生态环境质量耦合协调时空分异及影响因子研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(4):1123-1133.

景海超,刘颖慧,贺佩,等.青藏高原典型区生态系统服务空间异质性及其影响因素分析:以那曲市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(7):2657-2673.

王大尚,郑华,欧阳志云.生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(6):1747-1753.

Wang Bojie, Tang Haiping, Zhang Qin. Exploring connections among ecosystem services supply, demand and human well-being in a Mountain-Basin system, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020,17(15):5309.

浏览量

599

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系

内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗退化草原生态经济损失空间分异规律及驱动因子

基于HRAI-InVEST的NbS水文适配协同效益评估

长江中游地区洪涝灾害韧性时空演变与驱动因素

南方典型红壤区竹节沟生态系统服务功能评价及经济价值