云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性空间分异研究

肖玖军; 吴凯; 张蓝月; 李可相; 陈阳; 谢刚

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221028.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性空间分异研究

试验研究

- 云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性空间分异研究
- Spatial Differentiation of Importance of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第6期页码：332-342
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州科学院山地资源研究所,贵州,贵阳,550001
  2. 贵州省土地绿色整治工程研究中心,贵州,贵阳,550001
  3. 贵州省黔西南州自然资源局, 贵州兴义,562400
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"石漠化地区AM真菌促进桑树根系摄取土壤氮的调控机制"(32060377);贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2021]一般496号);贵州省林业科研课题(黔林科合[2017]08号);贵州省科技成果应用及产业化计划项目(黔科合成果[2021]一般130号);贵州省基础研究计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2021]一般100号);贵州科学院资助项目(黔科院人才[2019]07号);贵州省发展和改革委员会项目(黔发改投资[2019]886号);贵阳国家高新区科技计划项目(GXYF-2017-003;GXYF-2018-003)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221028.001
  中图分类号： X171.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
肖玖军, 吴凯, 张蓝月, 等. 云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性空间分异研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):332-342.

Xiao Jiujun, Wu Kai, Zhang Lanyue, et al. Spatial Differentiation of Importance of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 332-342.
肖玖军, 吴凯, 张蓝月, 等. 云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性空间分异研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):332-342. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221028.001.

Xiao Jiujun, Wu Kai, Zhang Lanyue, et al. Spatial Differentiation of Importance of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 332-342. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221028.001.

摘要

[目的] 探索云贵高原岩溶区生态系统服务功能重要性的空间分异规律，为保障岩溶区生态系统有效管理和生态安全格局构建提供科学参考。 [方法] 借助地理信息技术测算2019年黔西南州水源涵养、水土保持和生物多样性维护三项生态系统服务功能，分析其空间格局，在此基础上用空间自相关揭示黔西南州生态系统服务重要性的空间异质性规律。 [结果] ①黔西南州生态水平整体较好，生态系统服务功能较高重要性的国土比例大，为区域提供了较好的生态服务，其中水源涵养功能和生物多样性维护功能的重要以上面积比例比水土保持功能突出。 ②以村为单位，单项功能和总体功能的各级重要全局Moran’s I指数均在0.65以上，空间分布呈现较高的空间聚集特性，表现出条带或区块分布，具体各功能的不同等级重要性又表现出差异性。 ③生物多样性维护功能分别与水源涵养功能、水土保持功能的空间自相关聚类结果存在相似性。 ④生态系统服务功能重要性与水土流失和石漠化存在耦合性，空间分异特征受水热条件、地质背景、人为等因素综合作用。 [结论] 研究区生态系统服务功能供给能力较好，同时表现出较强的空间集聚性和异质性。在生态系统管理和生态治理政策制定时，应当考虑生态系统服务功能空间分异特征，科学划定分区，实现分区管理。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial variation pattern of ecosystem service importance in karst area of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau was examined to provide statistical support for effective management of the ecosystem and maintenance of an ecologically safe pattern in the area. [Methods] The values of three ecosystem services (water conservation

soil and water conservation

and biodiversity conservation) within Qianxinan Prefecture in 2019 were calculated using geographic information technology

and the spatial variation pattern was identified. Spatial heterogeneity of the ecosystem service importance in the region was pinpointed by spatial autocorrelation analysis. [Results] ① The overall ecological health of Qianxinan Prefecture was good. There was a large proportion of land with high ecosystem service importance

providing good ecological services for the region. The proportion of land providing water conservation function and biodiversity conservation function were larger than the proportion of land providing soil and water conservation function. ② Taking the village as a unit of measurement

the Moran’s I index was significantly high (0.65) in valuing the three ecosystem services both individually and aggregately. The study revealed that the research region featured strong spatial clustering with either “strip-shaped” or “block-shaped” ecosystem service clusters

and the functions and values of each cluster differred. ③ Spatial autocorrelation and clustering analyses of biodiversity conservation

water conservation

and soil and water conservation showed similar results. ④ Ecosystem service importance was coupled with soil and water erosion and rocky desertification. Hydrothermal conditions

geological processes

human impacts

and other factors contributed to such spatial variation. [Conclusion] The researched region possesses strong ecosystem service supply capacity with strong spatial clustering and heterogeneity. Such features should be considered in adopting ecosystem management and governance policies. The region should be subcategorized based on the spatial variation patterns of its ecosystem service values

and governed with tailored policies.

关键词

Keywords

references

Assessment M E. Ecosystems and human well-being:A framework for assessment[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 2003.

杨洁.黄河流域草地生态系统服务功能及其权衡协同关系研究[D].甘肃兰州:甘肃农业大学,2021.

Munns Jr W R, Rea A W, Mazzotta M J, et al. Toward a standard lexicon for ecosystem services[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2015,11(4):666-673.

Assessment M E. Ecosystems and human well-being:synthesis[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 2005.

Vihervaara P, Kumpula T, Tanskanen A, et al. Ecosystem services:A tool for sustainable management of human-environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010,7(3):410-420.

Ash N, Blanco H, Brown C, et al. Ecosystems and human well-being:A manual for assessment practitioners[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 2010.

郑华,李屹峰,欧阳志云,等.生态系统服务功能管理研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):702-710.

Guerry A D, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, et al. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions:From promise to practice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015,112(24):7348-7355.

Hu Yi'nan, Peng Jianan, Liu Yanxu, et al. Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions:A scenario approach in Erhai Lake basin, southwest China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,625:849-860.

兰安军,张百平,熊康宁,等.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.

De Valck J, Rolfe J. Spatial heterogeneity in stated preference valuation:Status, challenges and road ahead[J]. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2018,11(4):355-422.

Glenk K, Johnston R J, Meyerhoff J, et al. Spatial dimensions of stated preference valuation in environmental and resource economics:Methods, trends and challenges[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020,75(2):215-242.

许开鹏,王晶晶,迟妍妍,等.基于综合生态风险的云贵高原土地利用优化与持续利用对策[J].生态学报,2016,36(3):821-827.

高照忠,黄雅君,魏海霞,等.近30年云贵高原水蚀荒漠化遥感监测及影响因子时空分异规律[J].测绘通报,2021(10):117-122.

郭晓芳,李旭东,程东亚.云贵高原气温与降水空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):159-163.

马东旭,殷晓洁,周斯怡,等.基于中国植被图的西南地区主要乔木物种丰富度格局[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2022,51(2):249-257.

Peng Jian, Tian Lu, Zhang Zimo, et al. Distinguishing the impacts of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,46:101199.

韩会庆,苏志华.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358.

马国君.近三十年来云贵高原生态变迁研究综述:兼论民族地方性生态知识的价值[J].贵州民族研究,2010,31(6):108-115.

宋艳,仕玉治,邸燕,等.基于土地变化模型的中国北方喀斯特盆地国土空间预测[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,35(3):205-210.

李阳兵,谭秋,王世杰.喀斯特石漠化研究现状、问题分析与基本构架[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(3):27-34.

Xiong Y J, Qiu G Y, Mo D K, et al. Rocky desertification and its causes in karst areas:A case study in Yongshun County, Hunan Province, China[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009,57(7):1481-1488.

杜文鹏,闫慧敏,甄霖,等.西南岩溶地区石漠化综合治理研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):5798-5808.

张军以,戴明宏,王腊春,等.生态功能优先背景下的西南岩溶区石漠化治理问题[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(4):464-472.

顾羊羊,徐梦佳,杨悦,等.喀斯特石漠化区生态保护红线划定:以贵州省威宁县为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3462-3474.

Quine T, Guo D L, Green S M, et al. Ecosystem service delivery in karst landscapes:anthropogenic perturbation and recovery[J]. Acta Geochimica, 2017,36(3):416-420.

苏维词,杨华,李晴,等.我国西南喀斯特山区土地石漠化成因及防治[J].土壤通报,2006,37(3):447-451.

欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.

于书霞,尚金城,郭怀成.生态系统服务功能及其价值核算[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,24(5):44-46.

谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.

王克林,岳跃民,陈洪松,等.喀斯特石漠化综合治理及其区域恢复效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7432-7440.

Qiu Sijing, Peng Jian, Dong Jianquan, et al. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and associated social-ecological drivers in a karst region:A case study of Guizhou Province, China[J]. Progress in Physical Geography (Earth and Environment), 2021,45(1):98-114.

欧阳志云,徐卫华,肖燚,等.中国生态系统格局、质量、服务与演变[M].北京:科学出版社,2017.

景海超,刘颖慧,贺佩,等.青藏高原典型区生态系统服务空间异质性及其影响因素分析:以那曲市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(7):1-17.

李双成,谢爱丽,吕春艳,等.土地生态系统服务研究进展及趋势展望[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(12):82-89.

黔西南布依族苗族自治州综合农业区划编写组.黔西南自治州卷(黔西南布依族苗族自治州综合农业区划)[M].贵州贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1989.

黔西南州统计局,黔西南州第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室.黔西南州第七次全国人口普查公报[EB/OL](2021-11-18). http://www.qxn.gov.cn/zwgk/zfjg/ztjj_5135341/bmxxgkml_5135344/tjgb_5135353/202111/t20211118_71714900.html.

黔西南州第三次全国国土调查领导小组办公室,黔西南州自然资源局,黔西南州统计局.黔西南州第三次全国国土调查主要数据公报[EB/OL](2021-12-31). http://www.qxn.gov.cn/zwxx/bmdt/202112/t20211231_72176153.html.

Tong Xiaowei, Brand T M, Yue Yuemin, et al. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018,1(1):44-50.

贵州省水利厅.贵州省水土保持公告(2016-2020)[EB/OL](2021-12-17)[2022-07-02]. https://www.guizhou.gov.cn/zwgk/zdlygk/jjgzlfz/sljs/stbc/202112/t20211217_72074305.html.

自然资源部.自然资源部办公厅关于印发《资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价指南(试行)》的函[EB/OL]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202001/t20200121_2498502.html.

环境保护部,国家发展和改革委员会.关于印发《生态保护红线划定指南》的通知[EB/OL](2017-07-06)[2022-02-02]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/t20170728_418679.htm.

侯元兆,王琦.中国森林资源核算研究[J].世界林业研究,1995,8(3):51-56.

林子雁,肖燚,史雪威,等.西南地区生态重要性格局研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8667-8675.

Tobler W R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region[J]. Economic Geography, 1970,46:234-240.

吕韬,曹有挥."时空接近"空间自相关模型构建及其应用:以长三角区域经济差异分析为例[J].地理研究,2010,29(2):351-360.

Toledo-Gallegos V M, Long J, Campbell D, et al. Spatial clustering of willingness to pay for ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2021,72(3):673-697.

Zhai Tianlin, Wang Jing, Jin Zhifeng, et al. Did improvements of ecosystem services supply-demand imbalance change environmental spatial injustices?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,111:106068.

Ajaz Ahmed M A, Abd-Elrahman A, Escobedo F J, et al. Spatially-explicit modeling of multi-scale drivers of aboveground forest biomass and water yield in watersheds of the Southeastern United States[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017,199:158-171.

章维鑫,吴秀芹,于洋,等.2005-2015年小江流域生态系统服务供需变化及对石漠化的响应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):139-150.

赵筱青,石小倩,李驭豪,等.滇东南喀斯特山区生态系统服务时空格局及功能分区[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):736-756.

杨渺,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.四川省生物多样性与生态系统多功能性分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(24):9738-9748.

赵雪雁,马平易,李文青,等.黄土高原生态系统服务供需关系的时空变化[J].地理学报,2021,76(11):2780-2796.

浏览量

509

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系

2024年宁夏极端暴雨事件引发的梯田侵蚀调查研究

内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗退化草原生态经济损失空间分异规律及驱动因子

基于HRAI-InVEST的NbS水文适配协同效益评估

不同水土保持耕作措施对黑土坡耕地产流产沙的影响机制