2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动力

李洪飞; 望元庆; 王杰; 宋书愉; 许端阳

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221026.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动力

试验研究

- 2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动力
- Landscape Stability Dynamics and Their Driving Forces in Core Area of Ejina Oasis from 2013 to 2020
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第6期页码：268-276
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
  2. 辽宁师范大学地理科学学院,辽宁,大连,116029
  3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  中国科学院"西部之光"交叉团队项目-重点实验室合作研究专项"荒漠河岸林水分利用策略及其对水分条件的适应机制";国家自然科学基金项目(41971253)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221026.001
  中图分类号： Q149;X171
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李洪飞, 望元庆, 王杰, 等. 2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):268-276.

Li Hongfei, Wang Yuanqing, Wang Jie, et al. Landscape Stability Dynamics and Their Driving Forces in Core Area of Ejina Oasis from 2013 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 268-276.
李洪飞, 望元庆, 王杰, 等. 2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):268-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221026.001.

Li Hongfei, Wang Yuanqing, Wang Jie, et al. Landscape Stability Dynamics and Their Driving Forces in Core Area of Ejina Oasis from 2013 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 268-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221026.001.

摘要

[目的] 探究2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及其驱动机制，为荒漠绿洲的生态恢复与可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法] 基于高分一号遥感影像，借助景观格局指数、景观稳定性模型与地理探测器，研究额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性动态及影响因素。[结果] ①额济纳绿洲核心区景观类型以未利用地、林地和草地为主，2020年3者占总面积的90.98%；2013-2020年，研究区景观连通性、均匀度降低，聚集度、优势度增加，多样性、异质性增强，景观形状趋于简单化、规则化。②研究区景观稳定性呈“总体不稳，局部较稳”状态；2013-2020年景观稳定性变化呈“大部分不显著，局部有变动，冷点多于热点”趋势。③地下水埋深、供水量和植被变化对研究区景观稳定性变化的影响较大；气候变化、人类活动(城镇建设、耕地扩张、旅游活动干扰等)和人口增长是地下水埋深、供水量和植被变化的诱因，间接引起景观稳定性的变化；各驱动因子之间存在交互增强效应。[结论] 2013-2020年额济纳绿洲核心区景观稳定性整体较低且呈下降趋势，干旱的气候条件、耕种、旅游和城镇建设等因素及其交互作用是导致研究区景观稳定性降低的重要因素。

Abstract

[Objective] The landscape stability dynamics in the core area of Ejina Oasis from 2013 to 2020 and their driving mechanisms were determined in order to provide a basis for ecological restoration and sustainable development of the desert-oasis region. [Methods] Based on remote sensing images of Geosensor 1

a landscape pattern index

a landscape stability model

and GeoDetector

landscape stability dynamics of the core area of Ejina Oasis and its driving factors were investigated. [Results] ① The landscape type in the core area of Ejina Oasis was dominated by unused land

woodland. and grassland

accounting for 90.98% of the total area in 2020. Landscape connectivity and homogeneity of the study area decreased; aggregation

dominance

diversity

and heterogeneity increased; and landscape shapes tended to be simpler and regular from 2013 to 2020. ② Landscape stability of the study region was classified as “generally unstable

locally stable”

and the dynamics of landscape stability were classified as “mostly insignificant

locally variable

and more cold spots than hot spots” from 2013 to 2020. ③ Changes of groundwater depth

water supply

and vegetation cover had a great influence on the landscape stability dynamics of the study region. Climate change

human activities (urban construction

arable land expansion

tourism

etc.)

and population growth were the causal factors for the above factors that indirectly caused changes in landscape stability. The driving factors had an interactive enhancement effect. [Conclusion] From 2013 to 2020

landscape stability for the entire study region was low and showed a downward trend. Factors such as arid climate condition

farming

tourism

and urban construction

and their interactions were the dominant factors that explained the reduction in landscape stability in the core area of Ejina Oasis.

关键词

Keywords

references

孟阳阳,何志斌,刘冰,等.干旱区绿洲湿地空间分布及生态系统服务价值变化:以三大典型内陆河流域为例[J].资源科学,2020,42(10):2022-2034.

曹宇,欧阳华,肖笃宁,等.额济纳天然绿洲景观变化及其生态环境效应[J].地理研究,2005,24(1):130-139,164.

甘肃省张掖市志编修委员会.张掖市志[M].甘肃兰州:甘肃人民出版社,1993:224-225.

金塔县地方志编纂委员会.金塔县志[M].甘肃兰州:甘肃人民出版社,1992:220-222.

王耀斌.基于可持续发展的额济纳绿洲生态环境变化研究[J].甘肃联合大学学报(自然科学版),2010,24(1):58-63,66.

曹宇,肖笃宁,欧阳华,等.额济纳天然绿洲景观演化驱动因子分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(9):1895-1902.

董敬儒,颉耀文,段含明,等.黑河流域绿洲变化的模式与稳定性分析[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(4):1048-1056.

宋章建.流域分水后额济纳绿洲景观-服务时空变化研究[D].浙江杭州:浙江大学,2015.

包海梅,王健铭,赵红军,等.黑河配水后额济纳绿洲核心区景观格局动态变化[J].林业调查规划,2015,40(5):36-41.

库珂珂.黑河下游景观格局变化及其驱动力研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2018.

陈维强.额济纳绿洲景观格局、动态变化及其驱动力研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.

Macarthur R. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability[J]. Ecology, 1955,36(3):533-536.

Turner M G, Romme W H, Gardner R H, et al. A revised concept of landscape equilibrium:Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1993,8(3):213-227.

Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape Ecology[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1986.

陈利顶,傅伯杰.干扰的类型、特征及其生态学意义[J].生态学报,2000,20(4):581-586.

Hermosilla T, Wulder M A, White J C, et al. Impact of time on interpretations of forest fragmentation:three-decades of fragmentation dynamics over Canada[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019,222:65-77.

Sharma K, Robeson S M, Thapa P, et al. Land-use/land-cover change and forest fragmentation in the Jigme Dorji National Park, Bhutan[J]. Physical Geography, 2017,38(1):18-35.

Gobattoni F, Lauro G, Monaco R, et al. Mathematical models in landscape ecology:Stability analysis and numerical tests[J]. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 2013,125(1):173-192.

张欣,王志杰.黔中喀斯特山地城市景观稳定性评价与特征分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):5243-5254.

周根苗,李新建,王志强,等.东洞庭湖湿地景观格局演变及稳定性研究[J].湖南林业科技,2021,48(4):79-86.

徐秋阳,王巍巍,莫罹.京津冀地区景观稳定性评价[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4226-4233.

常学礼,李秀梅,白雪莲,等.荒漠绿洲交错区景观稳定性与维持机制[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(3):43-50.

董国涛,廉耀康,范正军,等.黑河生态调水后额济纳绿洲植被变化规律研究[J].人民黄河,2019,41(7):5-9.

张震域,赵沛,畅祥生,等.额济纳绿洲1992-2015年地下水埋深变化分析[J].人民黄河,2019,41(7):33-37.

张绘芳,地力夏提·包尔汉,朱雅丽,等.阿尔泰山森林景观格局的稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):189-194,353.

邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2007.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

浏览量

530

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

吉林省西部地区新增耕地变化及其驱动机制的多尺度探测

2000—2024年黄河源园区生态环境质量变化及其驱动因素

中国耕地流转的时空演变特征及其驱动因素

青海省2000—2024年生态环境质量演变及其驱动因素

基于可解释性机器学习的九寨沟景区滑坡易发性评价及驱动力分析