1. 西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
2. 中国科学院 地球环境研究所 黄土与第四纪地质国家 重点实验室,陕西,西安,710061
3. 河海大学,江苏,南京,210098
4. 中国电建集团 西北勘测设计研究院有限公司,陕西,西安,710065
5. 西安航天天绘数据技术有限公司,陕西,西安,710100
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张晔, 侯精明, 龚佳辉, 等. 1980—2020年渭河中上游流域土地利用演变及其对径流的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):231-237.
Zhang Ye, Hou Jingming, Gong Jiahui, et al. Land Use Evolution and Its Impact on Runoff Response in Middle and Upper Reaches of Weihe River Basin During 1980—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 231-237.
张晔, 侯精明, 龚佳辉, 等. 1980—2020年渭河中上游流域土地利用演变及其对径流的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):231-237. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220922.002.
Zhang Ye, Hou Jingming, Gong Jiahui, et al. Land Use Evolution and Its Impact on Runoff Response in Middle and Upper Reaches of Weihe River Basin During 1980—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 231-237. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220922.002.
[目的] 研究渭河中上游流域不同土地利用情景下径流的响应规律,为渭河中上游流域的发展规划及水资源管理提供科学支撑。[方法] 基于1980—2020年土地利用数据,分析流域40 a的土地利用变化特征,并结合SWAT模型,设置5种历史土地利用情景、两种综合土地利用情景和3种极端土地利用情景,探究径流在不同土地利用情境下的响应。[结果] ①流域40 a间耕地、水域及未利用土地面积逐渐减小,林地、草地和居民用地面积逐渐增加。②1980—2020年共5个时期模拟年均径流深分别为72.24,72.27,72.31,71.86,72.25 mm,退耕还林、退耕还草、耕地型、林地型及草地型模拟年均径流深分别为68.59,69.70,72.60,64.81,66.82 mm。[结论] 40 a间土地利用类型的变化对渭河中上游流域径流的影响小于10%;退耕还林、退耕还草对径流主要起抑制作用。在3个极端土地利用情境下径流大小为:耕地型>草地型>林地型,且耕地型与林地型、草地型情境下的差异明显。
[Objective] The response law for runoff under different land use scenarios in the middle and upper reaches of the Weihe River was analyzed in order to provide scientific support for development planning and water resource management of the middle and upper reaches of the Weihe River. [Methods] Based on land use data from 1980 to 2020
the characteristics of land use change in the Weihe River basin over the past 40 years were analyzed. the SWAT model was used to set up five historical land use scenarios
two comprehensive land use scenarios
and three extreme land use scenarios in order to determine the response of runoff under different land use scenarios. [Results] ① During the past 40 years
the areas of cultivated land
water
and unused land gradually decreased
while the areas of forest land
grassland
and residential land gradually increased. ② From 1980 to 2020
the simulated annual average runoff depths were 72.24
72.27
72.31
71.86 mm
and 72.25 mm in five periods
respectively. The average annual runoff depths were 68.59 mm
69.70
72.60
64.81
and 66.82 mm
respectively. [Conclusion] The SWAT model had good adaptability for the middle and upper reaches of the Weihe River. The impact of land use type changes on runoff in the middle and upper reaches of the Weihe River was less than 10%. Returning farmland to forest and grassland was mainly responsible for inhibiting runoff. In the three extreme land use scenarios
runoff size followed the order of cultivated land type>grassland type>forest type
and the differences between cultivated land and forestland and grassland were obvious.
周一星,曹广忠.改革开放20年来的中国城市化进程[J].城市规划,1999,23(12):8-13.
于涛方.中国城市人口流动增长的空间类型及影响因素[J].中国人口科学,2012(4):47-58.
摆万奇,赵士洞.土地利用变化驱动力系统分析[J].资源科学,2001,23(3):39-41.
李瑜琴,赵景波.过度放牧对生态环境的影响与控制对策[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):404-408.
郭旭东,陈利顶,傅伯杰.土地利用/土地覆被变化对区域生态环境的影响[J].环境科学进展,1999(6):66-75.
万荣荣,杨桂山.流域土地利用/覆被变化的水文效应及洪水响应[J].湖泊科学,2004,16(3):258-264.
李丽娟,姜德娟,李九一,等.土地利用/覆被变化的水文效应研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2):211-224.
彭珂珊.九八洪涝灾害的深层次原因系统分析[J].青海民族学院学报,1999,25(1):92-96.
景可,焦菊英.水土保持措施与效益评价研究: 以陕北安塞县为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):132-136.
许炯心,孙季.无定河水土保持措施减沙效益的临界现象及其意义[J].水科学进展,2006,17(5):610-615.
袁宇志,张正栋,蒙金华.基于SWAT模型的流溪河流域土地利用与气候变化对径流的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(4):989-998.
林凯荣,何艳虎,陈晓宏.土地利用变化对东江流域径流量的影响[J].水力发电学报,2012,31(4):44-48.
史晓亮,杨志勇,严登华,等.滦河流域土地利用/覆被变化的水文响应[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):21-27.
韩强,薛联青,刘远洪,等.塔里木河中上游土地利用变化的径流响应[J].干旱区地理,2017,40(6):1165-1170.
巨鑫慧,高肖,李伟峰,等.京津冀城市群土地利用变化对地表径流的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1413-1423.
Lin Bingqing, Chen Xingwei, Yao Huaxia, et al. Analyses of landuse change impacts on catchment runoff using different time indicators based on SWAT model [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,58:55-63.
Khare D, Patra D, Mondal A, et al. Impact of landuse/land cover change on run-off in a catchment of Narmada River in India [J]. Applied Geomatics, 2015,7(1):23-35.
李景宜.陕西渭河流域主要环境问题及其治理[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(6):967-973.
袁超.渭河流域主要河流水文干旱特性研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
林金辉.基于GIS的数字化渭河流域地理特性研究[D].陕西西安:西安建筑科技大学,2007.
张艳玲.陕西省渭河流域水文特性分析[J].西北水资源与水工程,2002,13(2):62-64.
赵俊侠,王宏,马勇,等.1990—1996年渭河流域水沙变化原因初步分析[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(S2):136-139.
刘闻,曹明明,刘琪,等.1951—2012年渭河流域降水频次变化特征分析[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(1):18-24.
葛志楠,郝洁,鞠琴,等.渭河流域土地利用变化对径流的影响[J].人民黄河,2020,42(6):7-12.
Schuol J, Abbaspour K C, Srinivasan R, et al. Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008,352(1/2):30-49.
陈耀亮.干旱区内陆河流域土地利用/土地覆被变化及其对蒸散发的影响[D].浙江杭州:浙江大学,2018.
0
浏览量
659
下载量
11
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621