长江经济带产业—碳排放—土地协同发展研究

叶芸; 於冉; 万年顺; 程宏晟; 汪沁; 於忠祥

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220919.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

长江经济带产业—碳排放—土地协同发展研究

试验研究

- 长江经济带产业—碳排放—土地协同发展研究
- Research on Coordinated Development of Production Development, Carbon Emission and Land Use in Yangtze River Economic Belt
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第5期页码：312-320
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 安徽农业大学经济管理学院,安徽,合肥,230036
  2. 安徽农业大学国土资源研究所,安徽,合肥,230036
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“面向多重不确定性的森林生态系统服务价值评估模型构建与优化研究”(71873003);安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目(SK2019A0130);安徽省自然科学基金项金(1908085QG310)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220919.001
  中图分类号： X24;X321
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
叶芸, 於冉, 万年顺, 等. 长江经济带产业—碳排放—土地协同发展研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):312-320.

Ye Yun, Yu Ran, Wan Nianshun, et al. Research on Coordinated Development of Production Development, Carbon Emission and Land Use in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 312-320.
叶芸, 於冉, 万年顺, 等. 长江经济带产业—碳排放—土地协同发展研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):312-320. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220919.001.

Ye Yun, Yu Ran, Wan Nianshun, et al. Research on Coordinated Development of Production Development, Carbon Emission and Land Use in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 312-320. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220919.001.

摘要

[目的] 研究长江经济带产业发展、土地利用及碳排放指数间的内在响应关系及作用机理，为区域协同发展提供思路。[方法] 基于GM (1，1)预测模型对产业发展、土地利用及碳排放指数进行灰色预测后进行耦合协调度分析，并运用PVAR模型探讨三者间的响应关系。[结果] ①区域各要素间的耦合度高于协调度，耦合协调状态呈增长趋势，而区域内部则呈现自下游至上游的降低趋势。②土地利用强度对于产业发展于前两期呈正向冲击，产业发展对碳排放为滞后2期内的先负而后转正冲击的倒V型波动趋势，土地利用对碳排放呈现明显的正相关脉冲响应。③三要素主要依赖于自身的发展路径，但产业发展对碳排放强度的解释力高于土地利用强度对其的解释力，而随着期数的增加，二者对碳排放的影响趋势均呈现增长趋势。[结论] 经济发展过程中产业结构调整及土地利用的配置和保障不可或缺，而碳排放作为未来发展中的重要制约因素也不可忽视，探索三者间的响应关系，能够更好地为区域协调发展提供依据。

Abstract

[Objective] The internal response relationship and mechanism of action among industrial development

carbon emission and land use in the Yangtze River economic belt were studied in order to provide ideas for regional coordinated development. [Methods] Based on the GM(1

1) prediction model

the grey prediction of industrial development

land use

and carbon emission index were determined. A coupling coordination analysis was carried out

and the panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model was applied to determine the response relationship among the three factors. [Results] ① The coupling degree among the regional factors was greater than the coordination degree

and the coupling coordination state showed an increasing trend. The trend within the region decreased from downstream to upstream. ② Land use intensity had a positive impact on industrial development in the first two periods

and industrial development had an inverted V-shaped fluctuation trend in which the impact on carbon emissions was first negative and then positive in the last two periods. Land use had an obvious positive impulse impact on carbon emissions. ③ The three factors mainly depended on their own development paths. However

the explanatory power of industrial development on carbon emission intensity was greater than that of land use intensity

and with the increase of the number of periods

the influence of both on carbon emissions tended to increase. [Conclusion] While industrial restructuring and land use allocation and protection are indispensable in the process of economic development

carbon emissions (as an important constraint in future development) can not be neglected. Determining the response relationships between the three factors can better provide a basis for coordinated regional development.

关键词

Keywords

references

IPCC. Climate Change 2021:Summary for Policymakers [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2021.

黄亮雄,安苑,刘淑琳.中国的产业结构调整: 基于三个维度的测算[J].中国工业经济,2013(10):70-82.

李博,胡进.中国产业结构优化升级的测度和比较分析[J].管理科学,2008,21(2):86-93.

李建新,杨永春,蒋小荣,等.中国制造业产业结构高级度的时空格局与影响因素[J].地理研究,2018,37(8):1558-1574.

项姬秀.跨境电商与物流链的融合发展: 基于产业结构优化视角[J].商业经济研究,2021(24):108-110.

陈兵,王伟龙.互联网、产业结构升级与绿色全要素生产率[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):43-53.

黄贤金,彭补拙,张建新,等.区域产业结构调整与土地可持续利用关系研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(4):425-429.

范树平,刘友兆,程久苗,等.转型期土地利用效益对产业结构升级的响应程度及其影响机理[J].土壤通报,2021,52(5):1034-1041.

Long Hualou, Heilig G K, Li Xiubin, et al. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the Transect of the Yangtse River, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2007,24(1):141-153.

Chen Yi, Chen Zhigang, Xu Guoliang, et al. Built-up land efficiency in urban China:Insights from the General Land Use Plan (2006—2020) [J]. Habitat International, 2016,51:31-38.

李培祥.城市产业结构转换与土地利用结构演变互动机制分析[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(31):10069-10070.

曹志宏,郝晋珉,郭力娜,等.黄淮海地区产业与用地空间集聚发展战略模式探讨[J].资源科学,2010,32(11):2145-2151.

但承龙,熊华.海南土地利用结构与产业发展关系研究[J].资源科学,2010,32(4):718-723.

Wu Hui, Fang Shiming, Zhang Can, et al. Exploring the impact of urban form on urban land use efficiency under low-carbon emission constraints: A case study in China’s Yellow River basin [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,311:114866.

於冉,黄贤金.碳排放峰值控制下的建设用地扩展规模研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(7):66-72.

周勇,赵伟.西安市土地利用结构碳排放核算及低碳优化研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(5):21-25.

余光英,员开奇.基于碳平衡适宜性评价的城市圈土地利用结构优化[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):179-184.

曾永年,王慧敏.以低碳为目标的海东市土地利用结构优化方案[J].资源科学,2015,37(10):2010-2017.

赵荣钦,黄贤金,钟太洋,等.区域土地利用结构的碳效应评估及低碳优化[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(17):220-229.

劳燕玲,李江风.低碳经济下区域土地利用结构优化分析[J].商业时代,2012(34):135-136.

汪勇政,唐婷,余浩然.安徽省乡村人口—土地—产业耦合协调性发展研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(3):40-48.

宋姝妍,蒋冬梅,李效顺,等.煤炭资源枯竭城市“人口—土地—产业”耦合测度研究[J].中国矿业,2021,30(10):57-65.

纪明,钟敏.中国南部陆地民族边境县域人口、产业与土地城镇化的耦合与协调: 基于新发展理念的考察[J].广西民族研究,2019(5):123-133.

王刚,张华兵,薛菲,等.成都市县域土地利用碳收支与经济发展关系研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(7):1170-1182.

董捷,吕思陶,张安录.武汉城市圈土地低碳—高效利用耦合特征及时空分析[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(5):106-115.

顾颖敏,周浩,黄朝禧.武汉市低碳经济发展和土地集约利用的耦合关系研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2013,30(2):35-39.

田泽,景晓栋,肖钦文.长江经济带碳排放—产业结构—区域创新耦合度及时空演化[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(2):10-17.

周霞,杜卓群.京津冀建筑产业时空布局演化及效果研究: 基于非首都功能疏解视角[J].建筑经济,2020,41(1):116-120.

张翱祥,邓荣荣.中部六省碳排放效率与产业结构优化的耦合协调度及影响因素分析[J].生态经济,2021,37(3):31-37.

张凤霞.资源型地区能源消费、人力资本积累与经济增长[J].统计学报,2021,2(5):35-48.

张樨樨,曹正旭,董会忠.京津冀地区产业结构、城镇化与生态环境耦合关联与动态响应研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,42(12):121-128.

曾苑.居民消费、产业结构升级与经济增长的关系研究: 基于PVAR模型对广东省的实证分析[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2021(20):47-49.

张洪,陶柳延,方文杰.长江经济带旅游技术创新、产业升级与绿色全要素生产率关系研究:基于GML指数与PVAR模型分析[J].河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(2):1-10.

Peng Chong, Song Malin, Han Feng. Urban economic structure, technological externalities, and intensive land use in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,152:47-62.

符海月,王昭雅.区域产业结构调整与土地利用效率关系:基于城镇化水平视阈的考察[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(10):69-78.

Heisey P. The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure [J]. Agricultural Systems,1996,50(3):329-332.

Fischer-Kowalski M, Singh S J, Lauk C, et al. Sociometabolic transitions in subsistence communities: Boserup revisited in four comparative case studies [J]. Human Ecology Review, 2011,18(2):147-158.

Aldwaik S Z, Pontius R G Jr. Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012,106(1):103-114.

Shi Rui, Cui Yu, Zhao Minjuan. Role of low-carbon technology innovation in environmental performance of manufacturing: Evidence from OECD countries [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021,28(48):68572-68584.

Chen Jingquan, Lian Xinyan, Su Hanning, et al. Analysis of China’s carbon emission driving factors based on the perspective of eight major economic regions [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021,28(7):8181-8204.

闵义岚,陈艳,李录堂.陕西省10市“土地—经济—环境”耦合协调关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):420-428.

韩兆安,吴海珍,赵景峰.数字经济与高质量发展的耦合协调测度与评价研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2022,37(6):22-34.

孙斌,徐渭,薛建春,等.黄河流域城市群城镇化与生态保护耦合协调研究[J].人民黄河,2022,44(6):16-21.

Dong Biying, Ma Xiaojun, Zhang Zhuolin, et al. Carbon emissions, the industrial structure and economic growth: Evidence from heterogeneous industries in China [J]. Environmental Pollution (Barking,Essex: 1987), 2020,262:114-322.

Wang Zhiqiang, Jia Xiaowei. Analysis of energy consumption structure on CO

. Energy Reports, 2022,8:1667-1679.

浏览量

572

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

大城市周边耕地变化强度与稳定性——以长江经济带的典型城市为例

长江经济带省域农业生态安全与粮食安全耦合协调

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系

西藏县域生态-经济-社会耦合协调发展的时空演变及预测

城乡融合背景下秦巴山区县域“三生”空间时空演变