1. 西安理工大学 水利水电学院,陕西,西安,710048
2. 西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王浩东, 汪妮, 汪泉熹. 基于时空演变的渭河流域陕西段生态服务价值及区间补偿关系研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):304-311.
Wang Haodong, Wang Ni, Wang Quanxi. Relationship Between Ecological Service Value and Interval Compensation in Shaanxi Section of Weihe River Basin Based on Temporal and Spatial Evolution[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 304-311.
王浩东, 汪妮, 汪泉熹. 基于时空演变的渭河流域陕西段生态服务价值及区间补偿关系研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):304-311. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220704.001.
Wang Haodong, Wang Ni, Wang Quanxi. Relationship Between Ecological Service Value and Interval Compensation in Shaanxi Section of Weihe River Basin Based on Temporal and Spatial Evolution[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 304-311. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220704.001.
[目的] 对渭河流域陕西段生态服务价值及区间补偿关系进行研究,为促进区域生态经济协同发展及生态环境建设提供理论指导。[方法] 基于渭河流域陕西段土地利用数据,通过土地利用动态度、当量因子法和重心模型法对生态系统服务价值(ESV)及其空间分布和时空演变情况进行研究,并结合优先级进行补偿关系分析。 [结果] ① 在退耕还林工程和城市化快速推进的影响下,空间数量上耕地的减少与建设用地的增加比较明显,其中建设用地单一动态度达到了5.94%,表现最为活跃;演变程度上草地、水体和其他用地更加剧烈。 ② 渭河流域陕西段ESV从562.07亿元减少为516.21亿元,下降幅度超过8%,其中水资源供给和水文调节等功能服务价值降低,林地的增加使气候调节和土壤保持等功能服务价值上升;空间分布上ESV呈现“中间低四周高”的格局;建设用地重心迁移和标准差椭圆体现出其具有东北方向移动趋势且区域范围持续扩大。 [结论] 周至县和太白县为优先受偿区,蓝田县、陇县和凤县为次级受偿区,应及时获得补偿来保证生态质量;雁塔区等11个地区为补偿区,应提供补偿资金来以维持整体生态建设。
[Objective] The ecological service value and interval compensation relationship of Shaanxi section of Weihe River basin were studied in order to provide theoretical guidance for promoting the coordinated development of regional ecological economy and ecological environment construction. [Methods] Based on the land use data of Shaanxi section of Weihe River basin
the ecosystem service value (ESV) and its spatial distribution and spatio-temporal evolution were studied by using land use dynamics
equivalent factor method and barycenter model method
and the compensation relationship was analyzed with priority. [Results] ① Under the influence of the project of returning farmland to forest and the rapid progress of urbanization
the reduction of cultivated land and the increase of construction land in spatial quantity were obvious
among which the single dynamic degree of construction land reached 5.94%
which was most active; The grassland
water body and other land use were more intense in the degree of evolution. ② The ESV in Shaanxi section of the Weihe River basin decreased from 56.207 billion yuan to 51.621 billion yuan
a decrease of more than 8%. Among them
the value of functional services such as water supply and hydrological regulation decreased
and the increase of forest land increased the value of functional services such as climate regulation and soil conservation; The spatial distribution of ESV showed a pattern of “low in the middle and high around”; The shift of the center of gravity and the standard deviation ellipse of the construction land reflect that it has the trend of moving in the northeast direction and the regional scope continues to expand. [Conclusion] Zhouzhi County and Taibai County were the priority compensation areas. Lantian County
Long County and Feng County were the secondary compensation areas
and compensation should be obtained in time to ensure ecological quality. Yanta District and 11 other regions were compensation areas
and compensation funds should be provided to maintain the overall ecological construction.
孟雅丽,苏志珠,马杰,等.基于生态系统服务价值的汾河流域生态补偿研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(8):76-81.
Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change[J]. Science, 2001,292(5515):281-284.
Trimble S W, Crosson P. Land use:US soil erosion rates:Myth and reality[J].Science, 2000,289(5477):248-250.
Sliva L, Dudley Williams D. Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality[J].Water Research, 2001,35(14):3462-3472.
Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke C R. Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,43:44-55.
高振斌,王小莉,苏婧,等.基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(6):563-570.
郭荣中,申海建,杨敏华.澧水流域生态系统服务价值与生态补偿策略[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(5):774-782.
刘焕才,崔敏华,李园园,等.汾河流域中游地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2021,48(4):635-640.
王可心,刘欣,张云路.国土空间用地变化与生态系统服务价值时空演变关系[J].中国城市林业,2021,19(5):28-33.
王女杰,刘建,吴大千,等.基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿:以山东省为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(23):6646-6653.
徐省超,赵雪雁,宋晓谕.退耕还林(草)工程对渭河流域生态系统服务的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(11):3893-3904.
杨小刚,宋进喜,程丹东,等.渭河陕西段河道生态服务价值评估[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(5):958-965.
刘纪远,布和敖斯尔.中国土地利用变化现代过程时空特征的研究:基于卫星遥感数据[J].第四纪研究,2000,20(3):229-239.
余新晓,张晓明,牛丽丽,等.黄土高原流域土地利用/覆被动态演变及驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(7):219-225.
Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
王飞,高建恩,邵辉,等.基于GIS的黄土高原生态系统服务价值对土地利用变化的响应及生态补偿[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(1):25-31.
朱磊,杨爱民,夏鑫鑫,等.基于空间自相关的1975-2015年玛纳斯河流域耕地时空特征变化分析[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(6):887-899.
仲俊涛,米文宝.基于生态系统服务价值的宁夏区域生态补偿研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(10):19-24.
0
浏览量
512
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621