甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响

明雪; 康振威; 黄智刚; 邓羽松

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220701.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响

试验研究

- 甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响
- Effects of Sugarcane Planting Patterns on Hydrological Connectivity of a Watershed
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第6期页码：106-113
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广西大学农学院/广西农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室,广西,南宁,530004
  2. 广西大学林学院,广西,南宁,530004
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  :广西科技重大专项"甘蔗农机农艺融合规模化生产技术示范"(桂科AA17202005-1);广西科技计划项目(桂科ZY21195016);广西科技计划项目(桂科ZY20198007)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220701.001
  中图分类号： P333;S126
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
明雪, 康振威, 黄智刚, 等. 甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):106-113.

Ming Xue, Kang Zhenwei, Huang Zhigang, et al. Effects of Sugarcane Planting Patterns on Hydrological Connectivity of a Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 106-113.
明雪, 康振威, 黄智刚, 等. 甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):106-113. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220701.001.

Ming Xue, Kang Zhenwei, Huang Zhigang, et al. Effects of Sugarcane Planting Patterns on Hydrological Connectivity of a Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 106-113. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220701.001.

摘要

[目的] 研究甘蔗种植模式(新植、宿根)与植被覆盖度的空间分布对流域水文连通性的影响，为流域水文连通性研究及水土流失治理提供科学参考。 [方法] 以IC指数(index of connectivity)为水文连通性指标，基于ArcGIS以及无人机高分辨率影像数据，分析那辣小流域水文连通性随甘蔗生长期变化的特征，并利用主成分分析法探究水文连通性的关键影响因素。 [结果] ①那辣小流域IC均值随甘蔗生长期变化在-2.07~-2.87，苗期IC均值显著大于(p＜0.05)分蘖期、伸长期和成熟期，各子流域IC值随甘蔗生长期表现为先减小后增大和持续减小两种不同趋势，且在空间上越接近道路网或河道IC值就越高。 ②新植甘蔗IC值在苗期与分蘖期显著大于宿根甘蔗(p＜0.05)，在成熟期显著小于宿根甘蔗(p＜0.05)，但在伸长期无显著差异。 ③苗期、分蘖期和成熟期水文连通性影响因素主要为种植模式、植被覆盖度和坡度，且新植面积所占比例对水文连通性影响大于宿根面积所占比例。 ④新植甘蔗面积比例在苗期、分蘖期和成熟期显著影响了植被覆盖度，且随着生长期推移，其影响逐渐降低。甘蔗种植模式会通过影响植被覆盖度进而影响水文连通性。 [结论] 那辣小流域水文连通性随甘蔗生长期有显著变化，且受到种植模式和植被覆盖度的显著影响，其中种植模式可以通过影响植被覆盖度进而影响水文连通性。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of the spatial distribution of sugarcane planting patterns (newly planted and perennial) and vegetation coverage on the hydrological connectivity of a watershed were determined in order to provide a scientific reference for hydrological connectivity research and soil erosion management of watersheds. [Methods] Using the index of connectivity (IC)

the variation characteristics of hydrological connectivity with sugarcane growing period were analyzed based on ArcGIS and UAV high-resolution image data. Principal component analysis was used to explore the key influencing factors of hydrological connectivity. [Results] ① The mean IC in the Nala watershed changed from -2.07 to -2.87 with increasing sugarcane growth stage

and the mean IC in the seedling stage was significantly greater than in tillering

elongation stage

and ripening stages (p＜0.05). The IC value of each sub-watershed showed two different trends: initially decreasing and then increasing

and continuously decreasing during the growth period of sugarcane. Places that were closer to the road network or river channel had higher IC values. ② The IC value of newly planted sugarcane was significantly greater than that of perennial sugarcane at the seedling and tillering stages (p＜0.05)

and significantly lower than that of perennial sugarcane at the ripening stage (p＜0.05)

but there was no significant difference at the elongation stage. ③ The main influencing factors of hydrological connectivity at the seedling

tillering

and ripening stages were planting mode

vegetation coverage

and slope

and the ratio of new planting area to hydrological connectivity was greater than that of perennial root area. ④ The area ratio of newly planted sugarcane significantly affected the vegetation coverage at the seedling

tillering

and ripening stages

and the effect gradually decreased with the passage of time. Sugarcane planting patterns affected hydrological connectivity by influencing vegetation coverage. [Conclusion] The hydrological connectivity of the Nala watershed changed significantly with sugarcane growth stage

and was significantly affected by planting patterns and vegetation coverage. Planting patterns can affect hydrological connectivity by influencing vegetation coverage.

关键词

Keywords

references

Pringle C M. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves:A global perspective[J].Ecological Applications, 2001,11(4):981-998.

袁亚男.昕水河流域土地利用与植被变化对水文连通性影响研究[D].北京:华北电力大学(北京),2019.

姚安坤.基于降雨模拟试验的坡面水文连通性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.

崔桢,沈红,章光新.3个时期莫莫格国家级自然保护区景观格局和湿地水文连通性变化及其驱动因素分析[J].湿地科学,2016,14(6):866-873.

Cui Yuan, Xiao Rong, Zhang Mingxiang, et al. Hydrological connectivity dynamics and conservation priorities for surface-water patches in the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve, China[J].Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2020,20(4):525-536.

王盛萍,姚安坤,赵小婵. 基于人工降雨模拟试验的坡面水文连通性[J].水科学进展,2014,25(4):526-533.

Sorriso-Valvo M, Bryan R B, Yair A, et al. Impact of afforestation on hydrological response and sediment production in a small Calabrian catchment[J].Catena, 1995,25(1/2/3/4):89-104.

Zhao Liang, Liu Yu, Luo Yong. Assessing hydrological connectivity mitigated by reservoirs, vegetation cover,and climate in Yan River watershed on the Loess Plateau, China:The network approach[J].Water, 2020,12(6):1742.

孙丽娅,上野正实,永田雅辉.不同栽培法和收割期对甘蔗单产及含糖量影响的分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(5):992-996.

Borselli L, Cassi P, Torri D. Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape:A GIS and field numerical assessment[J]. Catena, 2008,75(3):268-277.

蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.

Meyer G E, Neto J C. Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008,63(2):282-293.

贺怡.黄河口湿地水文连通关键受阻因素辨识及其阻隔效应研究[D].山东烟台:鲁东大学,2021.

Bracken L J, Wainwright J, Ali G A, et al. Concepts of hydrological connectivity:Research approaches,pathways and future agendas[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2013,119:17-34.

刘时城.延河流域不同尺度水文连通性研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.

Li Yong, Mo Yaqi, Are K S, et al. Sugarcane planting patterns control ephemeral gully erosion and associated nutrient losses:Evidence from hillslope observation[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021,309:107289.

Mu Hongli, Yu Xianju, Fu Suhua, et al. Effect of stem basal cover on the sediment transport capacity of overland flows[J]. Geoderma, 2019,337:384-393.

浏览量

537

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于CSLE模型的2024年福建省典型区域水土流失特征及其差异评估

红河干热河谷不同恢复模式下植被对干旱的抵抗力

基于支持向量机回归的次降雨小流域侵蚀产沙预报研究——以晋西王家沟为例

植被覆盖度的照相测量及其自动计算

湖南省澧水流域水土保持区划研究