基于SCS-CN模型的郑州市区域产流特征研究

马丽君; 王传涛; 王雯军; 张丽丽; 黄海平; 张升堂

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220608.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于SCS-CN模型的郑州市区域产流特征研究

试验研究

- 基于SCS-CN模型的郑州市区域产流特征研究
- Regional Runoff Characteristics in Zhengzhou City Based on SCS-CN Model
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第4期页码：203-209
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 山东科技大学地球科学与工程学院,山东,青岛,266590
  2. 南充职业技术学院,四川,南充,637131
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  山东科技大学研究生科研创新项目“郑州市城市内涝成因研究分析”（YC20210845）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220608.001
  中图分类号： P933;P333;S157.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
马丽君, 王传涛, 王雯军, 等. 基于SCS-CN模型的郑州市区域产流特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):203-209.

Ma Lijun, Wang Chuantao, Wang Wenjun, et al. Regional Runoff Characteristics in Zhengzhou City Based on SCS-CN Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 203-209.
马丽君, 王传涛, 王雯军, 等. 基于SCS-CN模型的郑州市区域产流特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):203-209. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220608.001.

Ma Lijun, Wang Chuantao, Wang Wenjun, et al. Regional Runoff Characteristics in Zhengzhou City Based on SCS-CN Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 203-209. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220608.001.

摘要

[目的] 根据郑州市下垫面产流情况研究该市内涝成因，为市区重要基础设施的暴雨内涝灾害风险防范与运行管理提供科学参考。[方法] 利用2016—2020年的气象资料和2020年的土壤、坡度、土地利用资料，采用SCS-CN水文模型，计算下垫面径流量，研究坡度、土壤、土地利用与径流量的关系。[结果] ①2016—2020年郑州地表径流分布整体上呈“东北高，西南低”“城区高，山区低”的趋势，除水域外，径流量主要分布在人类活动较密集区域。②较缓坡的径流最大。坡度贡献率与面积呈正相关。③郑州市土壤分为A (滨海风砂土)、B (黄绵土)、C (潮土等)、D (褐土性土)4类。D类径流最大，4类径流逐步呈上升趋势。土壤贡献率与面积呈正相关。郑州市主要为C类潮土，下渗率低。④SCS模型显示，前期土壤湿润程度越低，降雨下渗越多，径流越小。CN值越大，可能最大滞留量(S)越小，径流量越大。[结论] 郑州市地表产流在东北建设区域较为集中。产流越大，越易发生内涝。因此，应在产流集中的区域增加海绵砖、绿化带，及时修理排水管道。同时应推动郑州东南发展，以缓解郑州东北区域人类活动对地表产流的影响。

Abstract

[Objective] The causes of waterlogging in Zhengzhou City were studied in order to provide a reference for risk prevention and operation management of rainstorm waterlogging disasters in important parts of the urban infrastructure.[Methods] The SCS-CN hydrological model was used with meteorological data from 2016 to 2020

and with soil

slope

and land use data in 2020 to calculate the underlying surface runoff in Zhengzhou City and to study the relationship between slope

soil

land use and runoff.[Results] ① The distribution of surface runoff in Zhengzhou City from 2016 to 2020 showed patterns of "high in the northeast

low in the southwest" and "high in urban areas and low in mountainous areas". Runoff was mainly located in areas with more intensive human activities

except for water areas. ② Runoff was greatest on the gentle slopes. Slope contribution rate was positively correlated with area. ③ The soil in Zhengzhou City was divided into four categories:A (coastal aeolian sandy soil)

B (loess soil)

C (fluvo-aquic soil

etc.)

and D (cinnamon soil). The runoff of category D soil was the largest

and the four categories of soil all exhibited a gradual upward trend in runoff. There was a positive correlation between soil contribution rate and area. Zhengzhou City has primarily category C (fluvo-aquic) soil with low infiltration rate. ④ The SCS model showed that drier soil in the early stage leads to greater rainfall infiltration and less runoff. The larger the CN value

the smaller the S value (potential maximum retention or infiltration)

and the larger the runoff.[Conclusion] Surface runoff in Zhengzhou City was more concentrated in the northeast construction area. Greater runoff was more likely to cause waterlogging. Sponge bricks and green belts should be added to areas where runoff is concentrated

and drainage pipes should be repaired in a timely manner. Development of southeastern Zhengzhou City should be promoted to alleviate the impact of human activities on surface runoff in Northeastern Zhengzhou City.

关键词

Keywords

references

陈俊明.基于SCS-CN福州城区内涝风险空间划分与特征分析[J].地理空间信息,2020,18(4):92-95,124,7.

景垠娜,尹占娥,殷杰,等.基于GIS的上海浦东新区暴雨内涝灾害危险性分析[J].灾害学,2010,25(2):58-63.

王娇.西安市内涝灾害风险动态评估模型研究与应用[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2020.

姚远.郑州市地下轨道交通沿线建筑物暴雨内涝脆弱性评估[D].河南郑州:华北水利水电大学,2019.

吴安坤,黄钰,张淑霞.基于SCS模型的城市内涝灾害风险评价[J].防灾科技学院学报,2020,22(2):50-57.

Totaro F, Alberico I, Di Martire D, et al. The key role of hazard indices and hotspot in disaster risk management:The case study of Napoli and Pozzuoli municipa-lities(Southern Italy)[J]. Journal of Maps, 2020,16(2):68-78.

Geravand F, Hosseini S M, Ataie-Ashtiani B. Influence of river cross-section data resolution on flood inundation modeling:Case study of Kashkan River basin in Western Iran[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,584:124743.

朱思诚,任希岩.关于城市内涝问题的思考[J].行政管理改革,2011(11):62-66.

Huang Mingbin, Gallichand J, Wang Zhanli, et al. A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2006,20(3):579-589.

吴志宜,俞志强,朱雪坚,等. SCS模型在不同土地类型地表产流计算中的应用:以余姚地区为例[J].浙江大学学报:理学版,2016,43(2):226-230.

张鑫,张青峰,周阳阳,等.不同坡度黄土微地形条件下SCS-CN模型参数研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):74-77.

栾承梅,梁忠民,仇少鹏,等.山丘区小流域SCS-Nash产汇流模型应用[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2021,19(2):246-254.

吴克宁,赵瑞.土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):227-241.

Boughton W C. A review of the USDA SCS curve number method[J]. Soil Research, 1989,27(3):511-523.

Liu Xianzhao, Li Jiazhu. Application of SCS model in estimation of runoff from small watershed in Loess Plateau of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2008,18(3):235-241.

Jung J W, Yoon K S, Choi D H, et al. Water management practices and SCS curve numbers of paddy fields equipped with surface drainage pipes[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012,110:78-83.

Reistetter J A, Russell M. High-resolution land cover datasets, composite curve numbers, and storm water retention in the Tampa Bay, FL region[J]. Applied Geography, 2011,31(2):740-747.

Verma S, Singh P K, Mishra S K, et al. Activation soil moisture accounting(ASMA)for runoff estimation using soil conservation service curve number(SCS-CN) method[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,589:125114.

王冬,李丽,王加虎,等.径流曲线数(SCS-CN)模型在洪水预报中的应用研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(8):108-112.

刘家福,蒋卫国,占文凤,等. SCS模型及其研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):120-124.

雷晓玲,邱丽娜,魏泽军,等.基于SCS-CN模型在山地海绵城市不同下垫面径流预测的优化及应用[J].中国农村水利水电,2021(11):49-52,57.

费茉莉,刘苇航,王席,等.城市暴雨内涝模拟模型优化与精度验证[J].地球信息科学学报,2017,19(7):895-900.

马永强,李梦华,郝姗姗,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区雨水资源化途径及潜力分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2018(7):9-14.

徐刘凯,王全金,向速林.应用SCS模型模拟清丰水流域产汇流量[J].华东交通大学学报,2011,28(4):84-88.

符素华,王向亮,王红叶,等. SCS-CN径流模型中CN值确定方法研究[J].干旱区地理,2012,35(3):415-421.

郭晓辉,王秀茹,王希.基于SCS-CN和GIS的潜在集雨工程位置确定[J].湖南农业科学,2014(17):48-52.

杜世勋,郭新亚,荣月静.基于Budyko假设和SCS-CN模型的河源区水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):147-152.

李星瑶,张根广,高建恩,等.沟道土地整治对不同植被覆盖流域CN值的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(4):54-60.

浏览量

794

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄河首曲气候变化及其对黄河断流的影响

黄土区不同土地利用方式下径流量的神经网络模拟

基于相似年降水的人类活动对延河水沙变化影响

不同下垫面径流小区次降雨侵蚀特征相关分析

WEPP模型在东北黑土区的适用性评价--以坡度和水保措施为例