1. 河北农业大学 资源与环境科学学院,河北,保定,071000
2. 河北农业大学 邸洪杰土壤与环境实验室,河北,保定,071000
3. 河北省农田生态环境 重点实验室,河北,保定,071000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张雨萌, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 等. 生物炭配合深松对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):368-375.
Zhang Yumeng, Guo Yanjie, Zhang Lijuan, et al. Effects of Biochar Combined with Subsoiling on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 368-375.
张雨萌, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 等. 生物炭配合深松对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):368-375. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220523.001.
Zhang Yumeng, Guo Yanjie, Zhang Lijuan, et al. Effects of Biochar Combined with Subsoiling on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 368-375. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220523.001.
[目的
]
分析施加生物炭配合深松对农田耕层土壤容重、土壤结构稳定性及有机碳的影响,为土壤结构改良提供科学合理的调控措施和理论依据。[方法
]
基于冬小麦—夏玉米轮作体系,2017—2019年大田试验期间,在小麦季设置生物炭施用量分别为0,3 000,6 000 kg/hm
2
(B
0
,B
1
和B
2
)的3个处理,在玉米季设置传统贴茬播种(P)和深松耕作播种(S)2个耕作处理,共计B
0
P,B
1
P,B
2
P,B
0
S,B
1
S,B
2
S 6个处理。[结果
]
①两个轮作后,相同耕作方式下,土壤容重随生物炭用量的增加而降低,其中B
2
S较B
0
S显著降低(13.59%);同一施炭水平下,各处理土壤容重呈现出深松<传统的特征,深松容重整体较传统低4.95%。②连续施加生物炭配合深松耕作两年后,B
2
S处理下的有机碳含量达到最高,比B
0
P显著增加(42.15%),比B
2
P增加1.03%。③两个轮作后,随生物炭用量的增加机械性团聚体含量(DR
0.25
)、水稳性团聚体含量(WR
0.25
)、平均重量直径(MWD)呈上升趋势,相反土壤团聚体破坏率(PAD)及土壤不稳定团粒指数(ELT)呈逐渐下降趋势,且表现为B
2
S处理均优于其他各处理的特征,表明高添加量生物炭配合深松耕作较传统耕作能更有效地提高团聚体稳定性。[结论
]
小麦季基施6 000 kg/hm
2
生物炭并配合玉米季深松有利于提高土壤团聚体稳定性,改善华北平原农田土壤结构。
[Objective] The effects of applying biochar combined with subsoiling on soil bulk density
soil structure stability
and organic carbon in farmland topsoil were comprehensively analyzed to provide scientific and reasonable control measures and a theoretical basis for soil structure improvement. [Methods] A field experiment was conducted from 2017 to 2019 based on a winter wheat and summer corn rotation system. Biochar was applied at rates of 0
3 000
and 6 000 kg/hm2 (B0
B1
and B2) during the wheat season in conjunction with two tillage treatments 〔traditional stubble sowing (P) and subsoiling tillage sowing (S)〕 imposed during the corn season to produce a total of six combined treatments of B0P
B1P
B2P
B0S
B1S
and B2S. [Results] ① After two crop rotations
under the same tillage method
soil bulk density decreased with increasing biochar application rate
and bulk density under B2S was significantly lower than under B0S by 13.59%. Under the same biochar application level
soil bulk density under subsoiling was less than under traditional stubble sowing
and the subsoiling bulk density was 4.95% lower than the bulk density under traditional stubble sowing; ② After two years of continuous application of biochar combined with subsoiling tillage
the organic carbon content of B2S was the highest
and was 42.15% greater than observed for B0P and 1.03% greater than observed for B2P; ③ After two crop rotations
the mechanical aggregate content (DR0.25)
the water-stable aggregate content (WR0.25)
and the mean weight diameter (MWD) showed an upward trend with increasing biochar application rate. In contrast
soil aggregate destruction rate (PAD) and soil unstable aggregate index (ELT) showed a decreasing trend
and B2S produced better results than the other treatments
indicating that high biochar application rates combined with subsoiling tillage more effectively improved aggregate stability than traditional tillage. [Conclusion] A basic application of 6 000 kg/hm2 of biochar during the wheat season combined with corn season subsoiling could improve the stability of soil aggregates and the soil structure of farmland in the North China Plain.
史振鑫,吴景贵.不同处理牛粪对黑土团聚体组成与稳定性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2013(4):10-15.
窦森,李凯,关松.土壤团聚体中有机质研究进展[J].土壤学报,2011,48(2):412-418.
Karami A, Homaee M, Afzalinia S, et al. Organic resource management: Impacts on soil aggregate stability and other soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012,148:22-28.
王峻,薛永,潘剑君,等.耕作和秸秆还田对土壤团聚体有机碳及其作物产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):121-127.
王丽,李军,李娟,等.轮耕与施肥对渭北旱作玉米田土壤团聚体和有机碳含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(3):759-768.
Besnard E,Chenu C,Balesdent J,et al.Fate of particulate organic matter in soil aggregates during cultivation [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1996,47(4):495-503.
Liu Shuhong, Kong Fanlong, Li Yue, et al. Mineralions modified biochars enhance the stability of soil aggregate and soil carbon sequestration in a coastal wetland soil [J]. Catena, 2020,193:104618.
Zotarelli L, Alves B J R, Urquiaga S, et al. Impact of tillage and crop rotation on light fraction and intra-aggregate soil organic matter in two Oxisols [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007,95(1/2):196-206.
李景,吴会军,武雪萍,等.长期免耕和深松提高了土壤团聚体颗粒态有机碳及全氮含量[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(2):334-344.
Barto E K, Alt F, Oelmann Y, et al. Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation across a land use gradient [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(12):2316-2324.
余海英,彭文英,马秀,等.免耕对北方旱作玉米土壤水分及物理性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):99-104.
李景,吴会军,武雪萍,等.长期保护性耕作提高土壤大团聚体含量及团聚体有机碳的作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(2):378-386.
田慎重,王瑜,张玉凤,等.旋耕转深松和秸秆还田增加农田土壤团聚体碳库[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):133-140.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京: 中国农业出版社,2000:30-49.
谢钧宇,曹寒冰,孟会生,等.不同施肥措施及施肥年限下土壤团聚体的大小分布及其稳定性[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):274-281.
祁迎春,王益权,刘军,等.不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):340-347.
王润泽,谌芸,李铁,等.紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带土壤团聚体稳定性特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):210-216.
Kahlon M S, Lal R, Ann-Varughese M. Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013,126:151-158.
Paciolla M D, Kolla S, Sein L T, et al. Generation of Free Radicals by Humic Acid: Implications for Biological Activity-Humic Substances:Structures, Properties and Uses [M]//Humic Substances, 1998:203-214.
周虎,吕贻忠,杨志臣,等.保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(9):1973-1979.
Du Zhangliu, Zhao Jiankun, Wang Yiding, et al. Biochar addition drives soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in aggregate fractions from an intensive agricultural system [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017,17(3):581-589.
梁利宝,冯鹏艳.生物炭与有机肥、无机肥配施对采煤塌陷区复垦土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):305-308.
尚杰,耿增超,赵军,等.生物炭对土水热特性及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(7):1969-1976.
王玉玲,李军.利于小麦—玉米轮作田土壤理化性状和作物产量的耕作方式研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(5):1139-1150.
Tian Shenzhong, Ning Tangyuan, Wang Yu, et al. Crop yield and soil carbon responses to tillage method changes in North China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016,163:207-213.
0
浏览量
551
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621