1. 长安大学 土地工程学院,陕西,西安,710000
2. 陕西省土地整治重点实验室,陕西,西安,710000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张艳, 胡征南, 周浩浩, 等. 黄河干流沿线陕西段土地生态安全时空分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):258-267.
Zhang Yan, Hu Zhengnan, Zhou Haohao, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics on Land Ecological Security Along Main Stream of Yellow River in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 258-267.
张艳, 胡征南, 周浩浩, 等. 黄河干流沿线陕西段土地生态安全时空分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):258-267. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.032.
Zhang Yan, Hu Zhengnan, Zhou Haohao, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics on Land Ecological Security Along Main Stream of Yellow River in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 258-267. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.032.
[目的] 对黄河干流沿线陕西段土地生态安全时空分布特征进行研究,为维护区域土地生态环境提供科学依据和技术支持,为其他类似型区域提供参考。 [方法] 利用DPSIR构建土地生态安全评价体系,运用熵值法、自然断点法和改进后的TOPSIS法对2000-2020年黄河干流沿线陕西段土地生态安全时空特征进行分析。引入障碍度模型,进行障碍因子诊断。 [结果] ①土地生态安全综合值从2000年的0.448 7上升到2020年的0.535 3,综合安全水平由中级升至良好; ②2000-2020年中北部区域由中级上升为良好水平,南部保持中级水平,总体呈现向好发展趋势; ③土地生态安全评价单项结果各不相同,趋势呈现不同变化; ④2000-2020年准则层指标障碍度年变化率,驱动力、状态和压力以年均5.81%,6.81%和5.51%速度增加;影响和响应以年均26.74%和33.43%的速度下降; ⑤主要因子障碍度从2000年的农民人均纯收入和森林覆盖率变成了2020年的粮食总产量、人均建设用地面积和人均生态用地面积。 [结论] 黄河干流沿线陕西段土地生态安全时空分布达到良好水平,距离优质仍有差距。因此,在未来需要找准黄河干流沿线区域定位,坚持分类指导、因地制宜,绿色发展,赏罚同行,推进土地生态安全再上一个台阶。
[Objective] The temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of land ecological security along the main stream of the Yellow River were determined in Shaanxi Province in order to provide a scientific basis and technical support for maintaining the local land ecological environment
and to provide suggestions and a significant reference for other regions of the similar type. [Methods] A land ecological security evaluation system was constructed by DPSIR
and the time and space characteristics of land ecological security in the Shaanxi section along the main stream of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020 were analyzed using the entropy method
the natural breakpoint method
and the improved TOPSIS method. An obstacle degree model was introduced to diagnose obstacle factors. [Results] ① The comprehensive value of land ecological security increased from 0.448 7 in 2000 to 0.535 3 in 2020
and the comprehensive security level increased from intermediate to good; ② From 2000 to 2020
the central and northern regions increased from intermediate to good comprehensive security
and the south region remained intermediate; ③ The individual results of the evaluation of land ecological security were different
and the trends showed different changes; ④ The driving force
state
and pressure relative to the obstacle index changed at average annual rates of 5.81%
6.81%
and 5.51%
respectively
from 2000 to 2020; the impact and response decreased at average annual rates of 26.74% and 33.43%
respectively; ⑤ The main factor obstacles changed from the per capita net income of farmers and forest coverage in 2000 to total grain output
per capita construction land area
and per capita ecological land area in 2020. [Conclusion] Land ecological security in the Shaanxi section along the main stream of the Yellow River has reached a good level in time and space
but there is still a gap in order to achieve the high quality level. Therefore
in the future
it will be necessary to identify the pertinent area along the main stream of the Yellow River
adhere to classified guidance
adapt measures to local conditions
promote green development
reward and punish peers
and promote land ecological security to a higher level.
习近平在河南主持召开黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会[N].新华社,20190919.
李春燕.陕西省土地生态安全动态评价及驱动因素研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.
杨人豪,杨庆媛,曾黎,等.基于BP-ANN模型的农村土地生态安全评价及影响因素分析:以重庆市丰都县为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):206-213.
王毅,魏江超,孙启元,等.基于ARIMA-ANN模型的生态安全评价及预测:以河西走廊城市群为例[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(1):326-336.
杨倩.湖北汉江流域土地利用时空演变与生态安全研究[D].湖北 武汉:武汉大学,2017.
张莹.鄱阳湖流域土地集约利用与生态安全耦合协调发展研究[D].江西 南昌:江西农业大学,2018.
朱文博,张静静.基于土地利用变化情景的生态系统碳储量评估:以太行山淇河流域为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):446-459.
王磊,郭灿,李慧明.基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的宁夏回族自治区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):154-159.
于海洋,张飞,曹雷,等.基于乡镇尺度的土地生态安全时空格局评价研究:以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(19):6355-6369.
柳思,张军,田丰,等.2005-2014年疏勒河流域土地生态安全评价[J].生态科学,2018,37(3):114-122.
李悦,袁若愚,刘洋,等.基于综合权重法的青岛市湿地生态安全评价[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(3):847-855.
黄祁琦,杨庆媛.基于PSR模型的重庆市土地可持续利用评价及障碍因子诊断[J].湖北农业科学,2019,58(24):254-260.
李政,何伟,潘洪义,等.基于熵权TOPSIS法与ARIMA模型的四川省耕地生态安全动态预测预警[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):217-223,2.
蔡霄,杨洋,李鹏山,等.基于PSR-NES耦合模型的土地生态状况综合评估:以大邑县为例[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(4):685-694.
秦东丽,陈屹德.基于"PSR-EES"模型的江苏省旅游生态安全研究[J].南阳师范学院学报,2019,18(6):10-16.
程东林,陈英,乔蕻强,等.西北生态脆弱区城市土地生态安全时序性评价:以兰州市为例[J].中国国土资源经济,2020,33(7):83-89.
李进涛,李贻学,巩玉玲,等.基于IDRISI的山东省土地生态安全评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(S3):190-193.
徐美,朱翔,李静芝.基于DPSIR-TOPSIS模型的湖南省土地生态安全评价[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(5):1265-1272.
郭利刚,冯珍珍,刘庚,等.基于物元模型的汾河流域土地生态安全评价[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(6):2061-2069.
黄烈佳,杨鹏.长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(8):1780-1790.
于海洋,张飞,曹雷.精河县土地利用/覆被变化及土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(6):348-353.
任俊.基于熵值法的中部六省创新型省份建设水平评价研究[D].湖南长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
鲁春阳,文枫,袁晓妮,等.基于熵值法的河南省新型城镇化风险识别研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(11):142-147.
Fariasaires R F, Ferreira L. A new approach to avoid rank reversal cases in the TOPSIS method[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019,132:84-97.
刘婧,汤峰,张贵军,等.基于TOPSIS和矩阵组合的县域永久基本农田储备区划定时序研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2021,29(7):1224-1235.
张艳,胡征南,李照华,等.国家中心城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度因子诊断:以郑州市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(15):265-272.
刘庆,陈利根,舒帮荣,等.长株潭城市群土地生态安全动态评价研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(10):1192-1197.
卢晓宁,洪佳,王玲玲.洪泽湖湿地区土地生态安全评价[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(3):145-150.
李琴.中国生态福利绩效的时空演化及其收敛性:基于自然断点法与空间收敛模型[C].生态经济与健康中国:中国生态经济学学会2018年学术年会摘要集,2018.
鲁春阳,文枫,杨庆媛,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:以重庆市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(3):535-541.
0
浏览量
689
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621