南部沿海基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性研究

付馨雨; 李杰彪; 吴群; 李同同; 赵敬波

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.029

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

南部沿海基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性研究

试验研究

- 南部沿海基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性研究
- Permeability Characteristics of Bedrock Weathering Layer in Southern Coast Area of China
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第6期页码：230-237
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 核工业北京地质研究院国家原子能机构高放废物地质处置创新中心,北京,100029
  2. 深圳中广核工程设计有限公司,广东,深圳,518000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家国防科技工业局核设施退役及放射性废物治理专项"岩洞处置工程技术研究"子课题"花岗岩场址裂隙介质地下水流数值模拟研究"(科工二司[2019]1496号)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.029
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
付馨雨, 李杰彪, 吴群, 等. 南部沿海基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):230-237.

Fu Xinyu, Li Jiebiao, Wu Qun, et al. Permeability Characteristics of Bedrock Weathering Layer in Southern Coast Area of China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 230-237.
付馨雨, 李杰彪, 吴群, 等. 南部沿海基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):230-237. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.029.

Fu Xinyu, Li Jiebiao, Wu Qun, et al. Permeability Characteristics of Bedrock Weathering Layer in Southern Coast Area of China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 230-237. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.029.

摘要

[目的] 研究基岩地区地表风化层渗透特性，寻求其渗透系数的确定方法，可为孔隙-裂隙岩体地下工程的性能评价提供科学依据。 [方法] 以中国南部沿海花岗岩为研究对象，采用张力入渗仪，重点针对基岩风化层开展入渗试验研究，利用非线性回归法、多压力法、WS方法以及瞬态方法中的单盘测定法计算渗透系数，开展不同方法的综合对比与地质统计分析，确定研究区场地基岩表层风化层的渗透系数及其空间分布规律。 [结果] ①研究区基岩全风化层渗透系数分布在0.023～3.918 m/d，平均渗透系数约为0.971 m/d，与经验值相符； ②研究区地形较高处基岩风化层渗透能力相对较强，地形较低处渗透能力较弱； ③不同计算方法获得的渗透系数存在一定的差异性； ④多压力方法更适合研究区基岩风化层渗透系数的确定。 [结论] 研究区基岩风化层渗透系数可采用张力入渗仪和多压力方法确定，其渗透性能整体较弱。

Abstract

[Objective] The permeability characteristics of the bedrock weathering layer were determined in order to propose a corresponding experimental method of hydraulic conductivity

and thereby provide a scientific reference for the performance assessment of underground engineering facilities in a porous and fractured medium. [Methods] We focused on granite at an underground engineering site in the southern coastal area of China. A tension infiltrometer was used to conduct the infiltration tests on the bedrock weathering layer. A nonlinear regression model

the White and Sully method

a multi-pressure method

and the Smettem and Turner method were adopted to calculate the hydraulic conductivity and carry out a comprehensive and comparative analysis. The spatial distribution of the hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock weathering layer was determined based on a geologic statistical method. [Results] ① The hydraulic conductivity of the fully weathered bedrock in this area was between 0.023 and 3.918 m/d

and the measured mean value was around 0.971 m/d

which was consistent with the empirical value. ② The permeability capacity of the bedrock weathering layer in this area was stronger in the high terrain area than in the low terrain area. ③ There were some differences in hydraulic conductivity obtained by using different calculation methods. ④ The multi-pressure method was more suitable for determining the hydraulic conductivity in the study area. [Conclusion] The hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock weathering layer in the study area was obtained by using a tension infiltrometer and the multi-pressure method. The permeability capacity of the bedrock weathering layer was found to be relatively weak.

关键词

Keywords

references

邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.

Perroux K, White M I. Designs for disc permeameters[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1988,52:1205-1215.

樊军,王全九,邵明安.盘式吸渗仪测定土壤导水率的两种新方法[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(10):14-18.

朱良君,张光辉,任宗萍.4种土壤入渗测定方法的比较[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):163-167.

林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36.

刘澄静,角媛梅,高璇,等.哈尼梯田水源区不同景观类型土壤水分的入渗特性及影响因子[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):99-105,111.

黄金廷,尹立河,王晓勇,等.包气带垂向渗透系数的原位试验研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2013,24(5):33-35.

刘目兴,吴丹,崔文虎.长江三峡山地不同垂直带土壤入渗研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):56-61.

刘丽红,蒋勇军,王翱宇,等.岩溶槽谷区不同土地利用方式土壤入渗规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):51-55,59.

王燕,杨劲松,王相平,等.滨海农田土壤入渗特性规律研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(8):39-43.

陈世平,李毅,付秋萍,等.不同含盐土壤圆盘入渗特征试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):36-41.

范军亮.基于负水头的土壤水分运动特征研究及其参数推求[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.

Wooding R A. Steady infiltration from large shallow circular pond[J]. Water Resour Research, 1968,4:1259-1273.

Logsdon S D, Jaynes D B. Methodology for determining hydraulic conductivity with tension infiltrometers[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1993,57:1426-1431.

Ankeny M D, Ahmed M, Kaspar T C, et al. Simple field method determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1991,55:467-470.

White I, Sully M J. Macroscopic and Research microscopic capillary length and time scales from field infiltration[J]. Water Resour Research, 1987,23:1514-1522.

Scotter D R, Clothier B E, Harper E R. Measuring Saturated hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity using twin rings[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1982,20:295-304.

Vandervaere J P, Vauclin M, Elrick D E. Transient flow from tension infiltrometers (I):The two-parameter equation[J]. Soil Sciencce Society of America Journal, 2000,64:1263-1272.

Vandervaere J P, Vauclin M, Elrick D E. Transient flow from tension infiltrometers (Ⅱ):Four methods to determine sorptivity and conductivity[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64:1272-1284.

Ankeny M D, Kaspar T C, Horton R. Design for an automated infiltrometer[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1988,52:893-896.

Minasny B, Alex B, McBratney A B. Estimation of sorptivity from disc-permeameter measurements[J]. Geoderma, 2000,95:305-324.

Gardner W R. Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table[J]. Soil Sciencce, 1958,85:228-232.

Philip J R. Hillslo p infiltration divergent and convergent slops[J]. Water Resources Research, 1991,27:1035-1040.

石长春,樊军.利用盘式吸渗仪确定土壤水力学参数研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(33):127-134.

李仁海,周志超,李杰彪,等.甘肃北山地区典型沟谷包气带土壤渗透特征研究[J].土壤通报,2020,51(6):1380-1385.

李杰彪,苏锐,周志超,等.高放废物处置库预选场址包气带土壤渗透性研究[J].土壤学报,2015,52(6):1412-1421.

浏览量

557

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

河床沉积物理化学性质对渗透系数的影响研究——以渭河为例

基于景观连通性优化的坝上地区张家口段生态安全格局构建

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性

融雪期微地形对土壤水分时空分布的影响及短期预测

2000—2024年黄河源园区生态环境质量变化及其驱动因素