1. 广西师范大学 环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004
2. 珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护 教育部重点实验室/广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室 广西师范大学,广西,桂林,541004
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
唐伟, 侯满福, 刘雨婷, 等. 亚热带地区3种喀斯特林分凋落物组成对其持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):137-145.
Tang Wei, Hou Manfu, Liu Yuting, et al. Effect of Litter Composition on Its Water Holding Capacity for Three Typical Karst Forest Types in Subtropical Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 137-145.
唐伟, 侯满福, 刘雨婷, 等. 亚热带地区3种喀斯特林分凋落物组成对其持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):137-145. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.018.
Tang Wei, Hou Manfu, Liu Yuting, et al. Effect of Litter Composition on Its Water Holding Capacity for Three Typical Karst Forest Types in Subtropical Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 137-145. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.018.
[目的
]
揭示亚热带不同喀斯特林分凋落物组成对其持水性能的影响,为丰富森林生态水文研究和加深凋落物层与水文功能关系的认识提供科学依据。 [方法
]
收集亚热带喀斯特区的青冈林、青冈+光蜡树林、化香树+密花树林3种代表性林分的凋落物层,将其分为半分解、未分解枝、未分解叶和其他未分解凋落物4种成分,选择每种林分前3种主要成分分别按0%,20%,40%,60%,80%和100%比例混合成21组质量相同、组成比例不同的处理(3种林分共63组处理)。采用浸水法研究其持水性能。 [结果
]
①3种林分类型不同组成凋落物的持水率和吸水速率分别与浸水时间呈对数函数关系(R
2
≥0.718)和幂函数关系(R
2
≥0.998);在各浸水时段的持水率和吸水速率以化香树+密花树林纯未分解叶凋落物最大,青冈+光蜡树林纯未分解枝凋落物最小; ②凋落物的持水率和吸水速率均与未分解叶比例呈极显著正相关关系(p<0.01),与未分解枝的比例呈极显著负相关关系(p<0.01),与半分解凋落物的比例无明显关系; ③3种林分类型凋落物层的总蓄积量及其最大持水量无显著差异,但青冈林凋落物层的最大吸水速率显著高于化香树+密花树林。 [结论
]
凋落物组成显著影响其持水性能。在凋落物生态水文效应研究中应综合考虑凋落物蓄积量及其组成的影响。
[Objective] The effect of litter composition on its water holding capacity for three different karst forest types in subtropical region was determined in order to provide a scientific basis for enriching forest ecohydrological research and deepening the understanding of the relationship between litter and hydrological functions. [Methods] Litters were collected from three representative karst forest types
i.e.
Cyclobalanopsis glauca forest
Cyclobalanopsis glauca + Fraxinus griffithii forest
and Platycarya strobilacea + Myrsine seguinii forest in subtropical region. The litters were sorted into four components: semi-decomposed litter
undecomposed branches
undecomposed leaves
and undecomposed other litter forms. The first three main litter components of each forest type were mixed at the ratios of 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
and 100% with the same total weight
resulting in 21 groups for each forest type. The water holding capacities of the 63 litter groups were compared based on laboratory soaking experiments. [Results] ① The relationships of the water holding rate and the water absorption rate with soaking time were determined by logarithmic function (R2≥0.718) and power function (R2≥0.998). The highest value was observed in the group of undecomposed leaf litter of P. strobilacea + M. seguinii forest
while the lowest value was observed in the group of undecomposed branch litter of C. glauca + F. griffithii forest. ② The water holding rate and water absorption rate of litters had significant positive correlations with the proportion of undecomposed leaves (p<0.01)
significant negative correlations with the proportion of undecomposed branches (p<0.01)
and no significant relationship with the proportion of half-decomposed litters. ③ No significant differences in the total accumulation of litters and their maximum water holding capacity were found among the three forest types
whereas the maximum water absorption rate of litter was significantly higher in C. glauca forest than in P. strobilacea + M. seguinii forest. [Conclusion] The water holding capacity of litter is significantly affected by its composition
and this factor should be taken into account in studies of the hydrological effects of litters.
Da Silva W B, Périco E, Dalzochio M S, et al. Are litterfall and litter decomposition processes indicators of forest regeneration in the neotropics? Insights from a case study in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018,429:189-197.
王金悦,邓羽松,林立文,等.南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):169-175.
孟庆权,葛露露,杨馨邈,等.滨海沙地不同人工林凋落物现存量及其持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):146-152.
刘玉国,刘长成,李国庆,等.贵州喀斯特山地5种森林群落的枯落物储量及水文作用[J].林业科学,2011,47(3):82-88.
牛勇,刘洪禄,张志强.北京地区典型树种及非生物因子对枯落物水文效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):183-189.
Neris J, Tejedor M, Rodríguez M, et al. Effect of forest floor characteristics on water repellency, infiltration, runoff and soil loss in Andisols of Tenerife(Canary Islands, Spain)[J]. Catena, 2013,108:50-57.
涂志华,范志平,孙学凯,等.大伙房水库流域不同植被类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):127-133.
陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):146-151.
塔莉,张丽茹.冀北山地天然次生林枯落物层水文生态功能对不同林分密度的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):46-51.
陈波,孟成生,赵耀新,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.
Zhang Haiping, Yuan Wenping, Dong Wenjie, et al. Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2014,20:240-247.
刘士玲,郑金萍,范春楠,等.我国森林生态系统枯落物现存量研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2017,30(1):66-71.
刘忠玲,刘建明,吕跃东.倭肯河上游两种林型枯落物和土壤持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):235-241.
吴迪,韩振诚,李苇洁,等.马缨杜鹃不同花叶比例凋落物的分解程度和持水性能研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):186-191.
方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548.
刘斌,鲁绍伟,李少宁,等.北京西山6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):73-78.
王忠禹,刘国彬,王兵,等.黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425.
尹婧,邱国玉,何凡,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区人工林叶面积特征[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(2):440-447.
Zhang Deqiang, Hui Dafeng, Luo Yiqi, et al. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems:Global patterns and controlling factors[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008,1(2):85-93.
韩友志,邢兆凯,顾宇书,等.浑河上游白桦冷杉等4种林分枯落物储量及持水特性[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(11):15-18.
0
浏览量
563
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621