1. 成都理工大学 环境与土木工程学院,四川,成都,610059
2. 四川省生态环境科学研究院,四川,成都,610000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
李杉, 马鑫文, 吴勇, 等. 川中丘陵区农村生活污水资源化利用后的土壤养分特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):114-120.
Li Shan, Ma Xinwen, Wu Yong, et al. Soil Nutrient Characteristics After Rural Domestic Sewage Resource Utilization in Hilly Areas of Central Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 114-120.
李杉, 马鑫文, 吴勇, 等. 川中丘陵区农村生活污水资源化利用后的土壤养分特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(6):114-120. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.015.
Li Shan, Ma Xinwen, Wu Yong, et al. Soil Nutrient Characteristics After Rural Domestic Sewage Resource Utilization in Hilly Areas of Central Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 114-120. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.015.
[目的
]
探究川中丘陵地区施用经无害化处理的生活污水后,不同类型土壤在不同深度土层中各养分指标的变化特征,为农村生活污水的无害化处理和资源化利用提供科学支撑。 [方法
]
对三格化粪池处理后的农村生活污水进行资源化利用。在耕地中设置G
0
(37.5 L/m
2
),G
2
(75 L/m
2
),G
0
(空白)3种施用处理;在林地中设置L
1
(37.5 L/m
2
),L
2
(75 L/m
2
),L
3
(112.5 L/m
2
),L
0
(空白)4种施用处理。结合层次分析法(AHP)与主成分分析法(PCA)对各养分指标权重进行计算,对各处理在不同深度土层中的施用效果进行综合评分。 [结果
]
在生活污水不同的资源化利用处理除L
3
土壤养分评价等级为“良”外,其余处理皆为“优”。各处理下,耕地中各深度土层养分评价得分排序一致表现为:G
1
>G
0
>G
2
;林地中0-20 cm土层表现为:L
0
>L
2
>L
1
>L
3
;20-40 cm土层表现为:L
1
>L
0
>L
2
>L
3
。耕地施用对提升土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、速效磷、速效钾有明显的效果;林地少量施用对提升20-40 cm除速效钾外其余土壤养分的效果较好。 [结论
]
短期来看,在农村生活污水资源化利用时,适量的施用可改善耕地土壤的养分,对于林地无需施用土壤养分就可较好保持。
[Objective] The variation characteristics of various nutrient indexes in different types of soil in different soil layer after the application of harmless domestic sewage in the hilly area of central Sichuan Province were determined in order to provide scientific support for the harmless treatment and resource utilization of rural domestic sewage. [Methods] Rural domestic sewage treated by a three-grid septic tank was used for resource utilization. Three application treatments 〔G1(37.5 L/m2), G2(75 L/m2)
and G3 (blank)〕 were applied to farmland; four application treatments 〔L1 (37.5 L/m2)
L2 (75 L/m2)
L3 (112.5 L/m2)
and L0 (blank)〕 were applied to the forest land. The weight of each nutrient index was calculated by combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA)
and the application effect of each scheme in different soil layers was comprehensively evaluated. [Results] ① Under the different resource utilization treatments of domestic sewage
except for L3
the soil nutrient evaluation grade was “good”
and the domestic sewage utilization scheme was “excellent”. ② Under each treatment
soil nutrient evaluation scores at different depths of farmland followed the order of G1>G0>G2. The scores for the 0-20 cm soil layer at forest land followed the order of L0>L2>L1>L3. The scores for the 20-40 cm soil layer in forest land followed the order of L1>L0>L2>L3. ③ Farmland has obvious effects on improving soil organic matter
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
available phosphorus
and available potassium. Under small application amounts
forest land had a better effect on increasing soil nutrients (other than available potassium) in the 20-40 cm layer. [Conclusion] In the short term
under the resource utilization of rural domestic sewage
an appropriate application amount could improve the nutrient status of farmland soil
and it could be better maintained for forest land without applying soil nutrients.
马灿明,毛云峰,张健,等.我国农村厕所革命相关技术标准规范和实施进展[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(20):215-221.
侯怀恩,王子强,赵风兰.农村生活污水适度处理与资源化利用[J].地域研究与开发,2012,31(6):119-122.
张增伟,刘庆花,华雪洁,等.农村生活污水土地处理对土壤理化性质的影响[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,29(1):26-30.
李欣.农村生活污水农业利用的可行性及其对作物与土壤的影响研究[D].浙江 杭州:浙江大学,2018.
Liu Jiantong, Qiu Changqiang, Xiao Bangding, et al. The role of plants in channel-dyke and field irrigation systems for domestic wastewater treatment in an integrated eco-engineering system[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2000,16(2):235-241.
钱靖华,林聪,王宇欣,等.都市农业生态系统中污水资源化利用[J].城市环境与城市生态,2004(6):24-26.
邓利梅,陆传豪,刘刚才.川中丘陵区耕地撂荒对土壤养分的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(3):36-44.
张维,李启权,王昌全,等.川中丘陵县域土壤pH空间变异及影响因素分析:以四川仁寿县为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(7):1192-1199.
刘利昆,赵广举,穆兴民,等.基于最小数据集的青藏公路沿线土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):125-131.
裴亮,张体彬,陈永莲,等.农村生活污水再生水滴灌对根际土壤特性的影响研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(4):42-45.
董君.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].科技资讯,2015,13(29):218,220.
姚泽清,张洛嘉,熊安邦,等.基于层次分析的主成分分析法及其应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2016,46(18):176-183.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007:269.
邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
汪应洛.系统工程[M].2版.北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
唐柄哲,何丙辉,闫建梅.川中丘陵区土地利用方式对土壤理化性质影响的灰色关联分析[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1445-1452.
韩小孩,张耀辉,孙福军,等.基于主成分分析的指标权重确定方法[J].四川兵工学报,2012,33(10):124-126.
闫升,杨建英,史常青,等.基于AHP-PCA的铁尾矿不同植被恢复模式土壤养分评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(6):111-118.
冯鑫伟.基于多种组合模型的半干旱区次洪量预测[D].陕西 西安:西安理工大学,2018.
傅涛,倪九派,魏朝富,等.不同雨强和坡度条件下紫色土养分流失规律研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(1):71-74,101.
牛文全,郭超.根际土壤通透性对玉米水分和养分吸收的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(11):2785-2791.
赵广.紫色土坡耕地溶解态氮淋失的时空分布特性研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2014.
赵丛礼,吴德友.森林在环境保护中的新贡献:林地污水灌溉评价[J].农业环境与发展,1984(2):17-20.
0
浏览量
654
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621