1. 河南大学 黄河中下游数字地理技术教育部重点实验室,河南,开封,475004
2. 河南大学 地理与环境学院,河南,开封,475004
3. 河南大学 哲学与公共管理学院,河南,开封,475004
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
刘朋, 崔耀平, 崔洋, 等. 2000—2020年华北平原耕地综合价值及其时空变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):275-282.
Liu Peng, Cui Yaoping, Cui Yang, et al. Comprehensive Value of Cultivated Land and Its Spatio-temporal Changes in North China Plain During 2000—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 275-282.
刘朋, 崔耀平, 崔洋, 等. 2000—2020年华北平原耕地综合价值及其时空变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):275-282. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.034.
Liu Peng, Cui Yaoping, Cui Yang, et al. Comprehensive Value of Cultivated Land and Its Spatio-temporal Changes in North China Plain During 2000—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 275-282. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.034.
[目的
]
测算华北平原耕地的综合价值,分析价值差异和变化趋势,为中国耕地保护提供科学依据,促进形成耕地“多位一体”的保护新格局。[方法
]
基于耕地的现实功能与人为耕作的影响,将耕地的价值分为正向价值(经济价值、社会价值、生态价值)和负向价值(农药、化肥),利用收益还原法、价值替代法和当量因子法对华北平原2000,2010,2020年耕地的综合价值进行核算。[结果
]
2000,2010,2020年华北平原耕地价值分别为5.01×10
12
,8.45×10
12
,6.43×10
12
元;耕地的经济价值比例呈下降趋势,且正向价值在研究时段均大于负向价值。此外,各省间耕地价值分布不均衡,受耕地面积、耕作方式和农产品价格影响较大;其中,山东省耕地价值一直较为突出,河南省变化幅度较大;各省单位面积耕地的负向价值均呈上升趋势。[结论
]
2000,2010,2020年,华北平原的正向价值中,经济价值比例呈下降趋势,耕地的社会价值和生态价值的重要性逐渐凸显。各省单位耕地负向价值的区域差异较大,且负向价值均呈上升趋势,河南省最为明显,农膜、化肥等对耕地的负向影响一直没有得到有效治理,且呈逐年加重的趋势。
[Objective] The comprehensive value of cultivated land in the North China Plain were estimated
and the value differences and change trends were analyzed
in order to provide a scientific basis for the protection of cultivated land in China
and promote the formation of a new pattern of “multiple integrated” cultivated land protection. [Methods] Based on the actual function of cultivated land and the impacts of artificial cultivation
the value of cultivated land was divided into positive values (economic value
social value
and ecological value) and negative values (environmental impacts of pesticides and chemical fertilizers). The comprehensive value of cultivated land in the North China Plain in 2000
2010
and 2020 was calculated by the income reduction method
the value substitution method
and the equivalent factor method. [Results] The values of cultivated land in the North China Plain in 2000
2010
and 2020 were 5.01×1012
8.45×1012
and 6.43×1012 yuan
respectively. The proportion of the economic value of cultivated land showed a downward trend
and the positive value was greater than the negative value during the study period. Moreover
the distribution of the value among provinces was unbalanced
and was greatly affected by cultivated land area
farming methods
and agricultural product prices. The value of cultivated land in Shandong Povince has always been more prominent
while the value of cultivated land in He’nan Province has fluctuated greatly. The negative value of cultivated land per unit area in each province showed an upward trend. [Conclusion] In 2000
2010
and 2020
relative to the positive value in the North China Plain
the proportion of economic value showed a downward trend
and the importance of the social value and the ecological value of cultivated land gradually became prominent. The negative value per unit of cultivated land in each province showed large regional differences
and the negative value showed an upward trend
especially in He’nan Province. The negative impacts of agricultural film and chemical fertilizer on cultivated land have not been effectively controlled
and the trend is increasing year by year.
宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹.1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):435-447.
王梅,陈思,郑昂.耕地生产与生态功能协同保护的国际经验启示[J].国土资源情报,2020(7):36-42.
刘二阳,胡韵菲,王雪婷,等.中国农业生态价值测算及时空聚类特征[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(3):196-202.
戴文举,王东杰,卢瑛,等.华南地区县域耕地质量和产能评价研究:以广东吴川为例[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(4):419-430.
祝培甜,陈霈弦,郭瑞雪,等.国外耕地生态产品价值的实现路径及对我国的启示[J].国土资源情报,2020(3):41-45.
Song Yanhua, Yang Xihui. Improvement of evaluation methods for cultivated land quality [J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2018,10(10):57-62.
朱新帅,王博宇,黄克龙,等.常州市钟楼区耕地产能空间分布与影响因素分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2020,37(5):672-680.
唐春云,臧俊梅.新时代广州市耕地多功能评价及时空演变分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(2):332-343.
朱从谋,李武艳,杜莹莹,等.浙江省耕地多功能价值时空变化与权衡—协同关系[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(14):263-272.
王万茂,黄贤金.中国大陆农地价格区划和农地估价[J].自然资源,1997,19(4):3-10.
罗艳,张洪吉,罗晓波,等.四川省耕地资源资产价值估算研究[J].中国国土资源经济,2021,34(3):51-57.
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,25(1):3-15.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
王仕菊,黄贤金,陈志刚,等.基于耕地价值的征地补偿标准[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(11):44-50.
薛智超,闫慧敏,杜文鹏,等.自然资源资产负债表编制中土地资源过耗负债的核算方法研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):919-928.
钟骁勇,李洪义.耕地资源价值核算方法研究综述[J].中国国土资源经济,2020,33(9):41-47.
邹巧玉,刘平辉.抚州市耕地生态价值评估及时空变化特征分析[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(11):71-76.
蔡运龙.中国农村转型与耕地保护机制[J].地理科学,2001,21(1):1-6.
霍雅勤,蔡运龙,王瑛.耕地对农民的效用考察及耕地功能分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(3):105-108.
姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47.
李翠珍,孔祥斌,孙宪海.北京市耕地资源价值体系及价值估算方法[J].地理学报,2008,63(3):321-329.
许鹏鸿.耕地综合价值评价研究:以福州市琅岐岛为例[J].农业与技术,2019,39(23):171-174.
刘强,张金晖,董秀茹.基于“属性—功能—特征”的耕地价值核算研究:以辽宁省沈阳市为例[J].东北农业科学,2021,46(5):95-100.
张金晖.基于耕地功能的耕地价值核算研究:以沈阳市为例[D].辽宁 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2020.
张红,高文,蒲启迪.基于收益还原法的农用地资产价值测算与比较[J].中国房地产,2018(21):31-38.
陈丝露.基于耕地资源综合价值的绥化市征地补偿测算研究[D].黑龙江 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2017.
李佳,南灵.耕地资源价值内涵及测算方法研究:以陕西省为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(9):10-15.
王虹皖.芜湖县耕地生态系统服务价值核算:基于农用地分等成果[J].中国集体经济,2019(25):76-79.
彭丽云,许艳,黄背英,等.兰州市耕地生态系统服务价值估算[J].现代农业科技,2019(5):258-260.
苏浩,雷国平,李荣印.基于生态系统服务价值和能值生态足迹的河南省耕地生态补偿研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2014,48(6):765-769.
苏全平,范芳,魏林根,等.江西农业面源污染现状及控制对策[J].农业环境与发展,2006,23(6):43-46.
0
浏览量
643
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621