1. 庆阳职业技术学院 能源工程系,甘肃,庆阳,745000
2. 甘肃省庆阳生态环境监测中心,甘肃,庆阳,745000
3. 甘肃海慧安全科技有限公司,甘肃,庆阳,745000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王程, 敬小兰, 李敏, 等. 2016—2021年黄土高原马莲河干流水质时空变化特征及其成因[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):158-164.
Wang Cheng, Jing Xiaolan, Li Min, et al. Spatial-temporal Variations and Causes of Water Quality in Mainstream of Malian River in Loess Plateau from 2016 to 2021[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 158-164.
王程, 敬小兰, 李敏, 等. 2016—2021年黄土高原马莲河干流水质时空变化特征及其成因[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):158-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.020.
Wang Cheng, Jing Xiaolan, Li Min, et al. Spatial-temporal Variations and Causes of Water Quality in Mainstream of Malian River in Loess Plateau from 2016 to 2021[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 158-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.020.
[目的
]
分析黄土高原马莲河干流水质时空变化特征,揭示水质污染状况及成因,为该流域内生态文明建设和水环境治理提供科学依据。[方法
]
基于黄土高原马莲河干流2016—2021年甘肃省庆阳市境内5个断面水质逐月监测数据,结合单因子污染指数法、综合污染指数法对水质进行评价,利用线性趋势法对水质演变趋势进行分析。[结果
]
①2016—2021年庆阳市境内马莲河水质整体较差,属于Ⅴ类水范畴,综合污染指数较高,主要污染因子为高锰酸盐指数、化学需氧量(COD)、5日生化需氧量(BOD
5
)、氨氮(NH
3
-N)、总磷、氟化物及六价铬,下游水质优于上游。②庆阳市境内马莲河干流水质季节变化特征显著,综合表现为夏、秋季优于春、冬季。具体表现为秋季最优,冬季最差。[结论
]
2016年以来,庆阳市境内马莲河水质趋势稳定向好,尤其是2017年以后,向好趋势表现明显;受入境水质及流域地质条件影响,马莲河水污染治理任务依然任重而道远。
[Objective] The temporal and spatial variation characteristics of water quality in the main stream of the Malian River in the Loess Plateau were analyzed in order to reveal the pollution status and causes of water quality
thereby providing a scientific basis for the construction of ecological civilization and improvement of water quality in the basin. [Methods] Monthly water quality data from 2016 to 2021 for five sections of the mainstream of the Malian River at Qingyang City of Gansu Province in the Loess Plateau were evaluated by using the single factor pollution index method and the comprehensive pollution index method. Trends in water quality evolution were analyzed by using the linear trend method. [Results] ① The overall environmental quality of the Malian River water in Qingyang City from 2016 to 2021 was poor (category Ⅴ)
and the comprehensive pollution index was high. The main pollution factors were permanganate index
chemical oxygen demand (COD)
five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)
ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N)
total phosphorus
fluoride and hexavalent chromium. Downstream water quality was better than upstream water quality. ② The seasonal variation characteristics of water quality of the mainstream of the Malian River in Qingyang City were significant. The comprehensive performance was better in summer and autumn than in spring and winter
and the specific performance was best in autumn and worst in winter. [Conclusion] The trend of the water quality of the Malian River in Qingyang City since 2016 has been stable and improved
especially after 2017. Due to the influence of the water quality of the water entering
the river and the geological conditions of the river basin
the water pollution control task for the Malian River still has a long way to go.
中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义生态文明建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.
付素静,贾冰,张金.马莲河地表水化学特征及污染状况分析[J].人民黄河,2011,33(4):54-55.
斯扬,张文选,罗安湘,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长8致密砂岩油藏地层水化学特征成因及其油气指示意义[J].现代地质,2019,33(5):1106-1117.
解建仓,张建龙,朱记伟,等.马莲河苦咸水来源分析及治理方案[J].资源科学,2011,33(1):77-85.
付奔,李代华,夏永竹,等.云南省盘龙河水质时空变化特征[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2021,52(S2):339-347.
张胜,林莉,王珍,等.汉江中下游丰枯水期水质时空变化特征[J].长江科学院院报,2021,38(8):47-53.
孙艺珂,王琳,祁峰.改进综合水质指数法分析黄河水质演变特征[J].人民黄河,2018,40(7):78-81.
阮久莉,王艺博,郭玉文.基于层次分析—模糊综合评价法的锌冶炼行业水污染控制技术评价[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(5):976-982.
董颖,吴喜军,李怀恩,等.2013—2019年陕北矿区饮用水源地水质特征及驱动因素[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):284-289.
曾凤连,杨刚,王萍,等.淮河干流水环境质量时空变化特征及污染趋势分析[J].水生态学杂志,2021,42(5):86-94.
申洪鑫,牛蓓蓓,李富强,等.大汶河水质状况评价和污染源分析[J].安全与环境工程,2021,28(5):176-185.
杨荣金,王逸卓,李秀红,等.官厅水库水质评价及时空变化特征[J].水资源保护,2021,37(6):135-141.
邵志江,郑斌,汪涛.永定河上游主要河流地表水水质时空变化特征[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1338-1347.
王欢欢,白洁,刘世存,等.白洋淀近30年水质时空变化特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(5):1051-1059.
王淑丽,李志萍,赵贵章,等.2005—2018年涡河玄武河段水质演变趋势分析[J].人民长江,2021,52(5):13-17.
张耀宗,张多勇,刘艳艳.近50年黄土高原马莲河流域降水变化特征分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):44-52.
王瑞,代丹,张弛,等.太湖不同介质电导率时空变化特征[J].环境科学,2019,40(10):4469-4477.
曹同民.马莲河水体中Cr
+6
来源调查[J].中国环境监测,2003,19(6):43-46.
0
浏览量
553
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621