不同环境因子联接方法对崩岗易发性评价的影响

郭飞; 赖鹏; 陈洋; 王秀娟; 夏栋; 曹妍

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同环境因子联接方法对崩岗易发性评价的影响

试验研究

- 不同环境因子联接方法对崩岗易发性评价的影响
- Influence of Different Environmental Factor Connection Methods on Benggang Susceptibility Assessment
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第5期页码：123-130
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测研究站,湖北,宜昌,443002
  2. 三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
  3. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所,江苏,南京,210000
  4. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“不同降雨情景下赣南花岗岩区崩岗侵蚀易发性空间预测研究”(42107489);自然资源部城市自然资源监测与仿真重点实验室开放基金资助项目(KF-2019-04-071);土木工程防灾减灾湖北省引智创新示范基地(2021EJD026)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.016
  中图分类号： P954
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郭飞, 赖鹏, 陈洋, 等. 不同环境因子联接方法对崩岗易发性评价的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):123-130.

Guo Fei, Lai Peng, Chen Yang, et al. Influence of Different Environmental Factor Connection Methods on Benggang Susceptibility Assessment[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 123-130.
郭飞, 赖鹏, 陈洋, 等. 不同环境因子联接方法对崩岗易发性评价的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(5):123-130. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.016.

Guo Fei, Lai Peng, Chen Yang, et al. Influence of Different Environmental Factor Connection Methods on Benggang Susceptibility Assessment[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 123-130. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.016.

摘要

[目的] 研究不同联接方法对崩岗易发性的影响，为区域崩岗的精细化空间预测提供理论依据，进而为合理、经济、高效地做好防灾减灾提供科学支持。[方法] 基于随机森林模型，选择改进频率比(ALSA)与传统频率比(FR)两种不同联接方法，通过地理探测器选取年平均降雨量、年平均降雨侵蚀力、土壤可蚀性、坡长因子、黏粒含量、坡度、砂粒含量、标准化VH通道后向散射系数(表征地表覆被的性质)作为评价指标，以江西省兴国县永丰镇为例开展崩岗易发性评价。[结果] ①ALSA-RF模型较FR-RF模型精度更高，ACC，AUC值分别为83.89%，0.893 0； ②研究区极高、高易发区主要分布于其西南区域，这与实际崩岗分布情况较吻合。[结论] 改进频率比的联接方法较传统频率比方法可以更好地体现区域崩岗的分布规律，可为滑坡研究领域中的类似问题提供借鉴。

Abstract

[Objective] The influence of different connection methods on Benggang susceptibility was studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for the refined spatial prediction of regional Benggang in order to provide scientific supports for reasonable

economical

and efficient disaster prevention and reduction. [Methods] A random forest (RF) model was used to select two different connection methods: the improved frequency ratio (ALSA) and the traditional frequency ratio (FR). Annual average rainfall

annual average rainfall erosivity

soil erodibility

slope length factor

clay content

slope

sand content

and standardized VH channel backscatter coefficient (representing the nature of the surface cover) were used as evaluation indexes of Benggang susceptibility in Yongfeng Township

Xingguo County of Jiangxi Province. [Results] ① The accuracy of the ALSA-RF model was greater than the accuracy of the FR-RF model

and the values of ACC and AUC were 83.89% and 0.893 0

respectively; ② The extremely high and high susceptibility areas in Yongfeng Township were mainly located in the southwest

and this result was in good agreement with the actual situation. [Conclusion] The improved frequency ratio connection method better reflected the distribution law of regional Benggang susceptibility than the traditional frequency ratio method

and provided a reference for similar problems in the field of landslide evaluation.

关键词

Keywords

references

程冬兵,李定强,胡建民,等.崩岗侵蚀风险评估及分类防控关键技术研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.

刘希林.全球视野下崩岗侵蚀地貌及其研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(3):342-351.

季翔,黄炎和,林金石,等.基于CA-Markov模型与ANUDEM内插法的崩岗侵蚀量预估[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):128-136.

刘洪鹄,谢浩,钱峰.南方崩岗侵蚀机理及治理浅见[J].人民长江,2019,50(2):30-34.

Liu Xilin, Qiu Jinan, Zhang Dalin. Characteristics of slope runoff and soil water content in Benggang colluvium under simulated rainfall [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018,18(1):39-48.

Liu Weiping, Ouyang Guoquan, Luo Xiaoyan, et al. Moisture content, pore-water pressure and wetting front in granite residual soil during collapsing erosion with varying slope angle [J]. Geomorphology,2020,362:107210.

程冬兵,张平仓.南方崩岗侵蚀风险评估构想[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):346-350.

程冬兵,赵元凌,张平仓,等.基于Logistic模型的江西省崩岗侵蚀风险评估[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(6):106-116.

程冬兵,赵元凌,张平仓,等.基于双变量熵信息法的江西省崩岗侵蚀风险评估[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(2):27-32.

管家琳,黄炎和,林金石,等.基于信息量模型与随机森林模型的崩岗风险对比评估[J].山地学报,2021,39(4):539-551.

季翔,黄炎和,林金石,等.基于生态位适宜度的南方花岗岩区崩岗发生敏感性评价方法[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(10):159-168.

李翠漫,许贵林,卢远.广西桂东南区域崩岗关键影响因子及敏感性研究[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(3):131-136.

陈志强,陈志彪,陈丽慧.南方红壤侵蚀区典型流域土壤侵蚀危险性评价[J].土壤学报,2011,48(5):1080-1082.

姚莹莹,黄炎和,林金石,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的崩岗侵蚀危险性分区: 以安溪县小流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(5):1370-1376.

李文彬,范宣梅,黄发明,等.不同环境因子联接和预测模型的滑坡易发性建模不确定性[J].地球科学,2021,46(10):3777-3795.

Huang Faming, Ye Zhou, Jiang Shuihua, et al. Uncertainty study of landslide susceptibility prediction considering the different attribute interval numbers of environmental factors and different data-based models [J]. Catena, 2021,202:105250.

Hong Haoyuan, Chen Wei, Xu Chong, et al. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy [J]. Geocarto international, 2017, 32(2):139-154.

黄发明,胡松雁,闫学涯,等.基于机器学习的滑坡易发性预测建模及其主控因子识别[J].地质科技通报,2022,41(2):79-90.

Long Jingjing, Liu Yong, Li Changdong, et al. A novel model for regional susceptibility mapping of rainfall-reservoir induced landslides in Jurassic slide-prone strata of Western Hubei Province, Three Gorges Reservoir area [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021,35(7):1403-1426.

Li Langping, Lan Hengxing, Guo Changbao, et al. A modified frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment [J]. Landslides, 2017,14(2):727-741.

李郎平,兰恒星,郭长宝,等.基于改进频率比法的川藏铁路沿线及邻区地质灾害易发性分区评价[J].现代地质,2017,31(5):911-929.

孙昆,程冬兵,贺佳杰,等.崩岗侵蚀发生风险评估方法的对比研究: 以广东省为例[J].中国水土保持,2018(3):51-54.

Wei Yujie, Wu Xinliang, Wang Junguang, et al. Identification of geo-environmental factors on Benggang susceptibility and its spatial modelling using comparative data-driven methods [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021,208:104857.

Gayen A, Pourghasemi H R, Saha S, et al. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,668:124-138.

吴润泽,胡旭东,梅红波,等.基于随机森林的滑坡空间易发性评价:以三峡库区湖北段为例[J],地球科学,2021,46(1):321-330.

廖凯涛,刘艳,刘荃,等.赣州市崩岗侵蚀分布特征与影响因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):126-130.

Luo Wei, Liu C C. Innovative landslide susceptibility mapping supported by geomorphon and geographical detector methods [J]. Landslides, 2018,15(3):465-474.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

Luo Wei, Jasiewicz J, Stepinski T, et al. Spatial association between dissection density and environmental factors over the entire conterminous United States [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016,43(2):692-700.https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl066941

Wang Jinfeng, Hu Yi. Environmental health risk detection with GeogDetector [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2012,33:114-115.

Wang Jinfeng, Zhang Tonglin, Fu Bojie. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,67:250-256.

郑迎凯,陈建国,王成彬,等.确定性系数与随机森林模型在云南芒市滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J].地质科技通报,2020,39(6):131-144.

浏览量

543

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

红壤中无定形氧化铁-高岭石胶结体系的结构和抗剪强度

2000—2023年吉林省黑土核心保护区撂荒耕地遥感监测及水土保持效应

基于不同评价单元的滑坡易发性对比分析

2013—2023年三峡库区植被覆盖度时空变化及其驱动力

基于光谱指数优选的土壤盐分定量光谱估测