1. 广州大学 土木工程学院,广东,广州,510000
2. 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院,广东,广州,510060
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
邓日朗, 陈凌伟, 蔡俊坚, 等. 基于贡献率模型的崩塌易发性评价——以广州市白云区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):218-226.
Deng Rilang, Chen Lingwei, Cai Junjian, et al. Evaluation of Collapse Susceptibility Based on a Contribution Rate Model -A Case Study at Baiyun District, Guangzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 218-226.
邓日朗, 陈凌伟, 蔡俊坚, 等. 基于贡献率模型的崩塌易发性评价——以广州市白云区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):218-226. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.028.
Deng Rilang, Chen Lingwei, Cai Junjian, et al. Evaluation of Collapse Susceptibility Based on a Contribution Rate Model -A Case Study at Baiyun District, Guangzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 218-226. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.028.
[目的] 根据地质灾害野外普查空间数据库,分析花岗岩风化残积土发育地区崩塌形成机理和破坏模式,探究不同环境孕灾因子对崩塌发育的贡献率,评估崩塌灾害空间易发性与分布规律,为中国东南沿海地质灾害多发区的灾害防治工作提供科学支持。[方法] 在分析广州市白云区花岗岩风化残积土崩塌发育特征的基础上,选取高程、坡度、坡向、地形起伏度、距地表水体距离、降雨量、地层岩性、土地利用类型共8个与崩塌灾害发育密切关联的致灾因子构建崩塌灾害易发性评价指标体系,叠加研究区内404个历史崩塌数据,依据贡献率模型计算统计各指标因子崩塌灾害敏感性和空间分布特征。采用各二级指标因子贡献率的修正样本差确定因子权重。[结果] ①研究区内坡度、高程和地形起伏度对崩塌易发性贡献程度较高,坡向、地层岩性、降雨量在崩塌灾害易发性评价中贡献程度较低。②极高易发区主要集中在丘陵西麓,崩塌易发性由山地线范围外层边缘向中心逐级降低。③崩塌极高易发区和高易发区崩塌比率占总崩塌比率超过85%,模型易发性评价成功率和预测率分别达到91.3%和92.6%。[结论] 斜坡地形地貌因子对崩塌发育影响较显著,基于贡献率的崩塌灾害易发性评价模型能够客观量化指标因子权重,模型预测评价结果精度较高,易发性区划符合实际崩塌发育空间分布特征。
[Objective] The spatial database of geological disaster field survey was conducted to analyze the formation mechanism and failure mode of collapse in the area where granite weathered residual soil was developed
to explore the contribution rate of different environmental disaster factors to collapse development
and to evaluate the spatial susceptibility and distribution law of collapse disaster.[Methods] Based on the analysis of the development characteristics of granite weathered residual soil collapse at Baiyun District
Guangzhou City
eight disaster-causing factors closely related to the development of collapse disaster (including elevation
slope
slope direction
topographic relief
distance to stream
rainfall
stratum lithology
and land use) were selected to construct the evaluation index system of collapse disaster susceptibility
and 404 historical collapses in the study area were superimposed. Using the contribution rate model
the collapse disaster sensitivity and spatial distribution characteristics of each index factor were calculated and counted. The modified sample difference of the factor contribution rate of each secondary index was used to determine the factor weight.[Results] ① The contributions of slope
elevation
and topographic relief to collapse susceptibility in the study area were relatively high
while slope direction
stratum lithology and rainfall had low contributions to the assessments of collapse susceptibility. ② The extremely high-prone areas were mainly concentrated in the western foothills
and the collapse susceptibility decreased gradually from the outer edge of the mountain ground line to the center. ③ The collapse rates of the extremely high and high prone areas accounted for more than 85% of the total collapse rate. The model susceptibility evaluation success rate and prediction rate reached 91.3% and 92.6% respectively.[Conclusion] Topography and geomorphic factors of slope had significant impacts on collapse development. The collapse disaster susceptibility evaluation model based on contribution rate could objectively quantify the index factor weight
and the prediction results of the model had high accuracy. The susceptibility zoning conformed to the actual spatial distribution characteristics of collapse development.
朱耀琪.中国地质灾害与防治[M].北京:地质出版社,2017:71-72.
国土资源部地质环境司,国土资源部宣传教育中心.中国地质灾害与防治[M].北京:地质出版社,2003:184-185.
李萍,叶辉,谈树成.基于层次分析法的永德县地质灾害易发性评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):394-399,406.
Sreedevi N, Karthikeyan J. Landslide hazard zonation mapping using power method based AHP for Saklespur, India[J]. Indian Journal of Ecology, 2021,48(1):23-29.
许嘉慧,张虹,文海家,等.基于逻辑回归的巫山县滑坡易发性区划研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,38(02):48-56.
钱立辉,臧淑英.基于格网GIS与灰色关联模型的崩滑流灾害孕灾环境研究[J].地理信息世界,2020,27(6):64-68,74.
张俊,殷坤龙,王佳佳,等.三峡库区万州区滑坡灾害易发性评价研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(2):284-296.
郭子正,殷坤龙,付圣,等.基于GIS与WOE-BP模型的滑坡易发性评价[J].地球科学,2019,44(12):4299-4312.
Pradhan B. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2013,51:350-365.
Raghuvanshi T K, Negassa L, Kala P M. GIS based grid overlay method versus modeling approach:A comparative study for landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) in Meta Robi District of West Showa Zone in Ethiopia[J]. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2015,18(2):235-250.
李刚,赵新生,封丽华,等.基于模糊评价法优选泥石流防治方案:以青河县泥石流为例[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(4):18-23.
吴森,李虎杰,陈国辉,等.基于贡献率权重法的区域滑坡影响因子敏感性分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2016,27(1):26-31.
任凯珍,于淼,王晟宇,等.北京地区崩塌灾害成灾因子敏感性分析[J].人民长江,2017,48(7):60-64.
林金煌,张岸,邓超,等.闽三角城市群地质灾害敏感性评价[J].地球信息科学学报,2018,20(09):1286-1297.
崔玉龙,魏进兵,邓建辉,等.利用贡献率分析法研究河道型水库两岸滑坡发育规律[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2013,45(3):50-56.
吴彩燕,乔建平.三峡库区云阳-巫山段坡向因素对滑坡发育的贡献率研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2005,37(4):25-29.
金刚,王运生,刘江伟,等.白龙江流域斜坡坡向滑坡贡献率研究[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(5):100-105.
武鑫,赵浩然,郑秀清,等.基于改进突变理论的滑坡稳定性分级判别[J].自然灾害学报,2019,28(4):122-130.
陈顺满,吴爱祥,王贻明.基于贡献率和未确知测度理论的矿柱稳定性预测[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2017,50(5):697-703.
单博,陈剑平,王清.基于最小熵理论和未确知测度理论的泥石流敏感性分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(5):1445-1454.
易靖松,张勇,程英建,等.大巴山区顺层岩质滑坡发育影响因素的贡献率及易发性评价[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):275-280.
刘金山,任凯.广州市地质遗迹研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2008:103-104.
曹洪洋,袁颖,贾磊.区域降雨型滑坡灾害预警预报[M].北京:地质出版社,2017:8-10.
温美丽,陈瑜,何小武,等.基于GIS的崩岗分布及坡向选择性验证[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(03):1-7.
张玘恺,凌斯祥,李晓宁,等.九寨沟县滑坡灾害易发性快速评估模型对比研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(08):1595-1610.
0
浏览量
574
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621