固化剂与糯米浆固化土的工程性能对比分析

李杨; 周占学; 常宇; 吴凯; 江一博

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

固化剂与糯米浆固化土的工程性能对比分析

试验研究

- 固化剂与糯米浆固化土的工程性能对比分析
- Comparative Analysis on Engineering Performance of Stabilized Soil with Curing Agent and Glutinous Rice Slurry
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第4期页码：195-202
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北建筑工程学院土木工程学院,河北,张家口,075000
  2. 河北省土木工程诊断、改造与抗灾重点实验室,河北,张家口,075000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“自承重保温空心楼板力学性能及结构保温一体化研究”（52078476）;河北省高等学校青年拔尖人才计划（BJ2020010）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.025
  中图分类号： TU449
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李杨, 周占学, 常宇, 等. 固化剂与糯米浆固化土的工程性能对比分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):195-202.

Li Yang, Zhou Zhanxue, Chang Yu, et al. Comparative Analysis on Engineering Performance of Stabilized Soil with Curing Agent and Glutinous Rice Slurry[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 195-202.
李杨, 周占学, 常宇, 等. 固化剂与糯米浆固化土的工程性能对比分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):195-202. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.025.

Li Yang, Zhou Zhanxue, Chang Yu, et al. Comparative Analysis on Engineering Performance of Stabilized Soil with Curing Agent and Glutinous Rice Slurry[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 195-202. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.025.

摘要

[目的] 通过分别掺入离子固化剂、糯米浆对工业废料铁尾矿砂与黄土混合土进行固化试验，研究对比两种固化剂对目标土样的固化效果差异，为后续的工程应用及研究提供理论支持。[方法] 采用离子固化剂与糯米浆分别对目标混合土进行固化研究，通过干湿、冻融循环试验和自然风化试验对试件抗压强度的改变，综合评价两种固化剂对试件强度和耐久性的影响，并根据扫描电镜试验与比表面积试验测得孔隙结构对强度的影响。[结果] 掺入1.5%离子固化剂的混合土强度改善效果优于其他掺量的离子固化剂改良土，比素土提升50%强度；掺入10%糯米浆的混合土强度使素土强度增加110%。经过耐久性试验之后，掺入1.5%离子固化剂的混合土强度损失率更小，掺入10%糯米浆的混合土强度残余更高。[结论] 离子固化剂与糯米浆作为固化剂，均可提升土体材料的强度性能。糯米浆作为固化剂的固化效果优于离子固化剂。

Abstract

[Objective] The a curing test of industrial waste iron tailings sand and loess mixed soil by adding an ionic curing agent or a glutinous rice slurry was conducted

and the curing effects of the two curing agents on the target soil sample were compared in order to provide theoretical support for subsequent engineering application and research.[Methods] An ionic curing agent and a glutinous rice paste were used to solidify the target mixed soil. The influence of the two curing agents on the strength and durability of the soil specimen was comprehensively evaluated through changes in the compressive strength of the soil specimen through dry-wet

freeze-thaw cycles and natural weathering tests. The influence of pore structure on compressive strength was measured using a scanning electron microscope and a specific surface area test.[Results] The strength increasing effect of mixed soil with a 1.5% ionic curing agent was better than that of other ionic curing agents

and was 50% greater than that of untreated soil. The strength increasing effect of soil mixed with 10% glutinous rice pulp was greater than observed for other rates of glutinous rice pulp mixed with soil

and the strength of the treated soil increased by 110%. After the durability test

the strength loss rate of soil mixed with the 1.5% ionic curing agent was smaller

and the residual strength of soil mixed with 10% glutinous rice pulp was greater.[Conclusion] Both the ionic curing agent and the glutinous rice pulp treatments can increase the strength performance of soil materials. Glutinous rice paste could be better curing agent than the ionic curing agent.

关键词

Keywords

references

顾晓薇,艾莹莹,赵昀奇,等.铁尾矿资源化利用现状[J/OL].中国有色金属学报:1-29[2022-08-11].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1238.TG.20220112.1844.002.html.

吴迪,孟庆波,高玉德,等.某烧绿石尾矿选铌试验研究[J].有色金属(选矿部分),2021(6):112-118.

康洪震,王宇,李强.铁尾矿砂混凝土与HRB500钢筋锚固性能试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2020(1):92-96.

申艳军,白志鹏,郝建帅,等.尾矿制备混凝土研究进展与利用现状分析[J].硅酸盐通报,2021,40(3):845-857,876.

Cui Xiaowei, Geng Yong, Li Tao, et al. Field application and effect evaluation of different iron tailings soil utilization technologies[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021,173:105746.

Long Jibo, Chen Baodong, Zhu Yongguan, et al. Mycorrhiza and iron tailings synergistically enhance maize resistance to arsenic on medium arsenic-polluted soils through increasing phosphorus and iron uptake[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2021,107(6):1155-1160.

白永厚,陈泽盟,张耀阳,等.高原冻土地区公路路基回填材料优选及施工技术[J].水利水电技术,2021,52(2):100-108.

蒋鑫,凌建明,李进.高速公路填砂路基设计若干关键问题[J].地下空间与工程学报,2011,7(3):570-575.

孙婧,刘宏波,毛世奇,等.含盐铁尾矿砂在机械沙障中的固化性能[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):184-190.

杨良权,陈爱兵,高焕芝,等.尾矿库工程地质灾害易损性评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):290-295.

王银梅,韩文峰,谌文武.新型高分子固化材料与水泥加固黄土力学性能对比研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(11):1761-1765.

李建东,王旭,张延杰,等.F1离子固化剂加固黄土强度及微观结构试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(4):618-624.

陈丹,吕春娟,郭星星,等.容重对铁尾矿水分运移特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019(1):78-84.

崔宏环,秦晓鹏,王文涛,等.冻融条件下非饱和路基土的强度及微观特性研究[J].冰川冻土,2019,41(5):1115-1121.

崔凯,王东华,谌文武,等.基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(2):498-506.

纪晓佳,宋茂强,庞苗.糯米浆三合土的物理力学性能试验研究[J].建筑技术,2013,44(6):540-543.

Zhang Qi, Li Beibei, Zeng Qiang, et al. Erosion of aerial lime and sticky rice mortars by cyclic wetting-drying and dilute sulfate acid actions[J]. Advances in Cement Research, 2020,32(8):343-357.

Li Jiandong, Wang Xu, Zhang Yanjie, et al. Study on strength characteristics and mechanism of loess stabilized by F1 ionic soil stabilizer[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021,14(12):1-11.

中华人民共和国交通运输部.JTGE51-2009公路工程无机结合料稳定材料试验规程[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2009.

国家质量技术监督局,中华人民共和国建设部.GB/T50123-1999土工试验方法标准[S].北京:中国计划出版社,1999.

浏览量

638

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄河中游沙家湾小流域风沙环境特征及其入沟过程

典型黄土区人工林土壤水分与养分的区域特征

红壤中无定形氧化铁-高岭石胶结体系的结构和抗剪强度

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性

2000—2023年吉林省黑土核心保护区撂荒耕地遥感监测及水土保持效应