基于多准则妥协解排序法的安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全评价

何刚; 侯小宇; 王晓东; 赵疏航

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于多准则妥协解排序法的安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全评价

试验研究

- 基于多准则妥协解排序法的安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全评价
- Evaluation of Soil and Water Ecological Security for Mining Cities in Anhui Province Based on VIKOR Model
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第4期页码：161-171
- 作者机构：
  
  安徽理工大学经济与管理学院,安徽,淮南,232001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金“淮河流域水生态风险时空演化、预警及动态响应机制研究”（72271005）;安徽理工大学研究生创新项目“矿业城市水资源承载力多维测度与预测”（2021CX1013）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.021
  中图分类号： X322;X826
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
何刚, 侯小宇, 王晓东, 等. 基于多准则妥协解排序法的安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):161-171.

He Gang, Hou Xiaoyu, Wang Xiaodong, et al. Evaluation of Soil and Water Ecological Security for Mining Cities in Anhui Province Based on VIKOR Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 161-171.
何刚, 侯小宇, 王晓东, 等. 基于多准则妥协解排序法的安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):161-171. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.021.

He Gang, Hou Xiaoyu, Wang Xiaodong, et al. Evaluation of Soil and Water Ecological Security for Mining Cities in Anhui Province Based on VIKOR Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 161-171. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.021.

摘要

[目的] 探究矿业城市生态安全状况，厘清制约生态安全发展因素，为安徽省矿区可持续开采提供科学依据。[方法] 以安徽省9个矿业城市水土生态安全为例，构建基于经济—环境—社会的综合评价指标体系，通过乘法归一化法结合优化后的G1和CRITIC赋权法实现主客观赋权，再运用多准则妥协解排序法(VIKOR)模型，基于折中规划考虑了群体效应和个体妥协，兼顾不同权重指标实测值的差异性，利用障碍度模型对其进行障碍因子诊断。[结果] 多指标交互作用下的G1-CRITIC-VIKOR综合模型与实际数据匹配良好，安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全水平由高到低排序为池州、宣城、滁州、铜陵、马鞍山、宿州、亳州、淮北和淮南地区；其中工农就业人员比例、水土资源匹配系数、人均用水量、土地垦殖比例、城乡人均可支配收入是制约安徽省矿业城市水土生态安全水平的关键因素。[结论] 安徽省矿业城市应积极进行生态文明建设，努力把经济向集约型经济转变；实施植树造林，做好受损矿区生态修复、重建工作，保障其在水土生态安全的基础上科学合理地开采煤矿资源。

Abstract

[Objective] The status of ecological security in mining cities was determined and the factors restricting the development of ecological security were clarified in order to provide a scientific basis for sustainable mining in Anhui Province.[Methods] A comprehensive evaluation index system based on economy-environment-society was constructed for soil and water ecological security of nine mining cities in Anhui Province. The multiplicative normalization method was used to combine the optimized G1 and CRITIC weighting methods to achieve subjective and objective weight assignment. Then

the VIKOR model was used to consider the group effect and individual compromise based on compromise programming

and the difference of measured values of different weight indexes was taken into account. Finally

an obstacle degree model was used to diagnose the obstacle factors.[Results] The G1-CRITIC-VIKOR model under the interaction of multiple indicators produced results that were well matched with the actual data. The nine mining cities in Anhui Province were ranked (from high to low) based on their soil and water ecological security levels as Chizhou

Xuancheng

Chuzhou

Tongling

Ma'anshan

Suzhou

Bozhou

Huaibei

and Huainan. The proportion of workers and peasants employed

the matching coefficient of water and soil resources

the per capita water consumption

the proportion of land reclamation

and the per capita disposable income were the key factors restricting the level of water and soil ecological security of mining cities in Anhui Province.[Conclusion] The mining cities in Anhui Province should actively carry out ecological civilization construction and strive to transform their economies into intensive economies. At the same time

afforestation efforts should be implemented for ecological restoration and reconstruction of damaged mining areas so as to ensure the scientific and reasonable mining of coal resources on the basis of ecological security of water and soil.

关键词

Keywords

references

董霁红,吉莉,房阿曼.典型干旱半干旱草原矿区生态累积效应[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(6):1945-1956.

Safonova A G, Plugotarenko N K. System analysis in assessing the ecological safety of the urban environment[J]. Iop Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2021,720(1):012067.

司锦锦,王世东.基于组合赋权法的焦作矿区生态安全评价与时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):348-354.

李海波.工矿城市矿业废弃地生态修复潜力综合评价:以茂名某露天矿区为例[J].安全与环境学报,2022,22(1):505-511.

Wan Linwei, Du Chenlin. An approach to evaluation of environmental benefits for ecological mining areas based on ant Colony algorithm[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2021,14(2):797-808.

Han Baolong, Liu Hongxiao, Wang Rusong. Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015,318:217-225.

Gao Sheng, Sun Huihui, Cao Guangxi, et al. Dynamic assessment of island ecological security under urbanization:A case study of Pingtan Island in the Southeast Coast of China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018,77(14):531.

王锦洋,卢才武,李发本,等.基于PSR和GA-Elman模型的露天矿区生态安全评价研究[J].中国矿业,2020,29(2):65-71.

Shao Huaiyong, Sun Xiaofei, Lin Ying, et al. A method for spatio-temporal process assessment of eco-geological environmental security in mining areas using catastrophe theory and projection pursuit model[J]. Progress in Physical Geography (Earth and Environment), 2021,45(5):647-668.

石丹,关婧文,刘吉平.基于DPSIR-EES模型的旅游型城镇生态安全评价研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4330-4341.

李强华,闫靖勇.基于DPSIR模型的三亚市海岸带生态安全评价[J].海洋湖沼通报,2021,43(4):147-154.

Zhang Jingshen, Gao Jingqing. Lake ecological security assessment based on SSWSSC framework from 2005 to 2013 in an interior lake basin, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016,75(10):888.

李恒凯,刘玉婷,李芹,等.基于MCR模型的南方稀土矿区生态安全格局分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(6):989-998.

Ghosh S, Das Chatterjee N, Dinda S. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting using integrated DEMATEL-ANP and CA-Markov models:A case study on Kolkata Metropolitan Area, India[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021,68:102773.

谭吉玉,刘高常.基于小波支持向量机模型的矿区生态安全评价方法研究[J].黄金科学技术,2020,28(6):902-909.

赵杨秋,何刚,王莹莹,等.基于BP神经网络的工业生态安全动态评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):127-136.

李蕊,陈国清,李玮贤,等.基于遥感生态指数的神东矿区1995-2020年生态环境质量的时空变化特征分析[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):143-151.

张合兵,张克,刘培,等.基于RS和GIS的矿区生态指标提取与安全评价:以焦作矿区为例[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(4):80-88.

陈勇,甘勇,苗作华,等.基于云模型的地下铁矿区生态风险模糊综合评价[J].武汉科技大学学报,2016,39(4):289-294.

法子薇,李新春.基于云模型的煤矿资源型城市生态风险评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(9):190-194.

徐钰德,刘子金,黄嵩,等.干旱区人工绿洲水土环境生态安全演变分析[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2021,52(1):105-115.

叶辉,王金亮,赵娟娟.基于DPSIR-EES模型的北回归线(云南段)生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):291-298.

吕广斌,廖铁军,姚秋昇,等.基于DPSIR-EES-TOPSIS模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价及其时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):249-258.

江孝君,杨青山,耿清格,等.长江经济带生态-经济-社会系统协调发展时空分异及驱动机制[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):493-504.

贡力,逯晔坤,靳春玲,等.基于改进G1-和谐度方程的兰州市水生态文明评价[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(6):6-11.

么泽恩,蔡海生,张学玲,等.基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的浮梁县土地生态安全时空分异及其障碍因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(10):2452-2463.

林文豪,陈梅倩,周礼刚,等.一种区间Pythagorean模糊VIKOR多属性群决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2021,30(3):57-64.

杨海燕,孙晓博,程小文,等.基于VIKOR法的潍坊市水资源承载力综合评价[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(2):716-723.

周子英,刘伏英.基于PSR-可拓云模型的湖南省怀化市农业生态安全评价[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(2):267-274.

吕广斌,廖铁军,姚秋昇,等.基于DPSIR-EES-TOPSIS模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价及其时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):249-258.

浏览量

578

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于文献计量的长江经济带重点湖泊生态环境研究进展与趋势分析

基于生态系统服务和生态敏感性评价的云中山-系舟山生态网络构建

2000—2024年黄河源园区生态环境质量变化及其驱动因素

冻融循环条件下伊犁地区滑坡黄土湿陷特性及微观机理

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性