1. 河北建筑工程学院 土木工程学院,河北,张家口,075000
2. 河北省土木工程诊断、改造与抗灾重点实验室,河北,张家口,075000
3. 河北省高校道桥结构健康监测与维修加固应用 技术研发中心,河北,张家口,075000
4. 河北省沥青路面工程固废综合利用技术创新中心,河北,张家口,075000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
孙婧, 李家园, 刘勇智, 等. 挡沙堤—固沙砖综合型体系防风固沙效果的数值模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):135-144.
Sun Jing, Li Jiayuan, Liu Yongzhi, et al. Numerical Simulation of Windbreak and Sand Fixation Effects of an Integrated Sand-retaining Dike and Sand-fixing Brick System[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 135-144.
孙婧, 李家园, 刘勇智, 等. 挡沙堤—固沙砖综合型体系防风固沙效果的数值模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):135-144. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.018.
Sun Jing, Li Jiayuan, Liu Yongzhi, et al. Numerical Simulation of Windbreak and Sand Fixation Effects of an Integrated Sand-retaining Dike and Sand-fixing Brick System[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 135-144. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.018.
[目的] 针对河北省张家口市坝上地区风沙流对公路造成的沙埋问题,建立了挡沙堤—固沙砖综合型防风固沙体系,并对其防风固沙效果进行分析,以期为公路风沙灾害防治提供相关技术参数。[方法] 利用ANSYS软件对挡沙堤周围流场变化、沙粒运动轨迹、固沙砖沙障间距以及固沙砖沙障周围积沙情况进行数值模拟研究,评价挡沙堤—固沙砖综合体系的防风固沙效果。[结果] ①风沙流经过挡沙堤时,会在其周围形成减速区、加速区、紊流区和恢复区,通过风沙流减速区流场分析得到,边坡率为1∶1.2的挡沙堤防风固沙效果最佳。②利用离散相模型(DPM)模拟了沙粒跃移挡沙堤的运动轨迹。当风速为12~20 m/s时,沙粒落点在距挡沙堤11~21 m的位置,进而确定铺设固沙砖沙障的相对位置。③当固沙砖起始位置距离挡沙堤11 m,铺设成11排,1 m×1 m的方格形式时,固定地表流沙效果最佳。[结论] 挡沙堤—固沙砖综合体系通过“远阻近固”的方式来降低风速,阻挡地表流沙,固沙砖沙障能有效防止翻越挡沙堤沙粒的再次起动,改善公路沙埋现象,保证风沙灾害区域的行车安全。
[Objective] In view of the sand burying problem caused by the wind and sand flow on the highway in Bashang area of Zhangjiakou City
Hebei Province
a comprehensive wind and sand fixing system of sand retaining dike sand fixing brick was established
and its wind and sand fixing effect was analyzed
in order to provide relevant technical parameters for the prevention and control of wind and sand disasters on the highway.[Methods] The flow field change around the sand retaining dike
and sand particle movement trajectory
sand-fixing brick spacing
and sand accumulation around the sand-fixing brick were numerically simulated by ANSYS software to evaluate the wind-prevention and sand-fixation effects of the integrated sand-retaining dike and sand-fixing brick system.[Results] ① A deceleration zone
an acceleration zone
a turbulence zone
and a recovery zone were formed around the sand-retaining dike as wind and sand passed through it. The sand-retaining dike with a slope ratio of 1:1.2 had the most effect on slowing wind and fixing sand. ② A discrete phase model (DPM) was used to simulate the trajectory of sand jumping on the sand-retaining dike. When the wind speed is 12~20 m/s
the sand falling point was 11~21 m away from the sand-retaining dike
and then the relative position of laying the sand-fixing brick was determined. ③ When the starting position of sand-fixing bricks was 11 m away from the sand-retaining embankment
and they were laid in 11 rows in a square form of 1 m×1 m
then the effect of fixing surface quicksand was the best.[Conclusion] The integrated sand-retaining dike and sand-fixing brick system reduced the wind speed and blocked the surface quicksand by "far-resistance and near-fixation". The sand-fixing brick barrier can effectively prevent the restart of sand particles crossing the sand retaining dike
thereby decreasing the occurrence of highway sand burial
and ensuring driving safety in wind and sand disaster areas.
刘正恩.河北坝上生态退化现状、原因及对策措施[J].生态经济,2010(1):166-169.
辛国伟,程建军,杨印海.铁路沿线挂板式沙障开孔特征与风沙流场的影响研究[J].铁道学报,2016,38(10):99-107.
程建军,智凌岩,薛春晓.箱体式活动沙障风沙流场特征[J].交通运输工程学报,2017,17(5):61-70.
黄勇.酒额铁路戈壁风沙流地区沙害成因及防治措施[J].铁道标准设计,2015,59(7):32-35.
张凯,赵沛雯,张兴鑫,等.风速廓线形式对HDPE板高立式沙障风沙流场的差异性研究[J].铁道学报,2020,42(9):143-149.
Cheng Jianjun, Lei Jiaqiang, Li Shengyu, et al. Disturbance of the inclined inserting-type sand fence to wind-sand flow fields and its sand control characteristics[J]. Aeolian Research, 2016,21(5):139-150.
Horvat M, Bruno L, Khris S, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of barriers for windblown sand mitigation using CFD analysis[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020,197(10):104058.
Li B, Sherman D J. Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences:A review[J]. Aeolian Research, 2015,17(11):33-48.
李晓军,蒋富强.风沙流对戈壁地区挡风墙响应规律的数值模拟分析[J].铁道标准设计,2016,60(3):47-51,60.
丁泊淞,高丽,程建军,等.斜插板式沙障插板倾角影响下风沙流特征的数值模拟[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):132-137.
张凯,王起才,杨子江,等.新建格库铁路HDPE板高立式沙障防风效益数值模拟研究[J].铁道学报,2019,41(3):169-175.
Gillies J A, Etyemezian V, Nikolich G, et al. Effectiveness of an array of porous fences to reduce sand flux:Oceano Dunes, Oceano CA[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017,168(6):247-259.
Sarah M C, Jeong J K, Sang J L, et al. Shelter effects of porous muti-scale fractal fences[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerody Namics, 2017,163(1):6-14.
Lee S J, Park K C, Park C W. Wind tunnel observation about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particale movement[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002,36(9):1453-1463.
崔晓宁,梁柯鑫,王起才,等.新建格库铁路挡沙堤阻沙机理研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(7):85-92.
富宝锋,王志强,何艺峰,等.沙粒在复合型阻沙措施附近沉积特性数值模拟[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(S1):438-440.
石龙,李凯崇,蒋富强,等.铁路沿线挡沙堤设计参数优化分析[J].铁道建筑,2017,57(9):119-123.
王海龙,刘畅,孙婧,等.沙漠铁路固沙砖设计参数的数值模拟[J].铁道标准设计,2018,62(11):59-64.
徐超.张家口市坝上气候变化特征研究[J].农村经济与科技,2020,31(6):6-8.
赵小虎,王新军,李振山.风力作用下沙粒冲击起动风速分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(5):53-57.
张凯,王起才,张兴鑫,等.格库铁路HDPE板栅栏有效防护距离[J].交通运输工程学报,2020,20(5):105-115.
谢虎雄,马发跃,武生智.风沙环境中公路风沙灾害的数值模拟[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(2):151-157.
辛国伟,程建军,景文宏,等.来流廓线对风沙流场和风沙堆积影响的数值模拟:以挡沙墙为例[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(3):672-679.
张兴鑫,张凯,史博源,等.流动沙丘区公路路基风沙流场数值模拟及路面沙害形成机制[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(4):1184-1191.
石龙,蒋富强.斜插板挡沙墙设计参数优化数值模拟[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(3):666-673.
0
浏览量
674
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621