河海大学 农业科学与工程学院,江苏,南京,211100
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
徐晓辉, 刘慧, 王为木, 等. 湖北省保安湖水体营养状态监测与分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):116-123.
Xu Xiaohui, Liu Hui, Wang Weimu, et al. Monitoring and Analysis on Eutrophication Status in Baoan Lake of Hubei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 116-123.
徐晓辉, 刘慧, 王为木, 等. 湖北省保安湖水体营养状态监测与分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(4):116-123. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.015.
Xu Xiaohui, Liu Hui, Wang Weimu, et al. Monitoring and Analysis on Eutrophication Status in Baoan Lake of Hubei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 116-123. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.015.
[目的
]
探究湖北省保安湖水体营养状态时空特征,分析影响湖泊水体叶绿素a的主要影响因子,为其生态修复与保护提供科学依据。[方法
]
在湖区设置监测点位,于2019—2021年进行取样监测分析,并运用综合营养状态指数(TLI)评价湖区的营养状态。采用空间自相关分析对保安湖营养状态的空间相关性与聚集程度进行研究。通过Logit模型分析叶绿素a浓度变化的关键水环境影响因子。[结果
]
保安湖TLI变化范围为47.25~55.86,营养状态在中营养和轻度富营养间波动。湖区营养状态整体呈现显著的正空间自相关关系,其Global Moran’s I分别为0.46,0.93,0.60,0.31,0.60和0.62。主体湖南部是TLI的热点(高/高集聚)区域(p
<
0.01),扁担塘湖区是TLI的冷点(低/低集聚)区域(p
<
0.01)。影响叶绿素a浓度变化的主要水环境因子排序为:透明度>TP>pH值>COD
Mn
>水深>DO,均与叶绿素a浓度有显著相关性。[结论
]
湖区水体营养状态良好。流域内应通过控制农田水土流失及养殖业面源污染,加强入湖河道治理等方式减少外源磷输入,采用生态水位调控和修复水生植被等措施来进一步改善水体营养状态。
[Objective] The spatio-temporal characteristics of the eutrophication status in Baoan Lake
and the key water environmental impact factors were studied in order to provide a basis for ecological restoration and protection.[Methods] Monitoring sites were set up in Baoan Lake. Sampling and monitoring were conducted from 2019 to 2021. The trophic state index (TLI) was introduced to evaluate the nutritional status of the lake
and spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to study the spatial correlation and aggregation degree of eutrophication in Baoan Lake. The main water environmental impact factors of chlorophyll a concentration were analyzed by a logit model.[Results] The nutrient status of Baoan Lake fluctuated between mesotrophic and slightly eutrophic
and the range of TLI was 47.25~55.86. The eutrophication level of Baoan Lake showed significant spatial autocorrelation
with Global Moran's I values of 0.46
0.93
0.60
0.31
0.60
and 0.62. The southern areas of the main boady of Baoan Lake were the hot spots (high/high concentration) for lake eutrophication level (p<0.01)
and Biandantang lake area was the cold spot (low/low concentration) for lake eutrophication level (p<0.01). The main water environmental factors affecting the change of chlorophyll a concentration were transparency > TP > pH value > CODMn > water depth > DO
which were significantly correlated with chlorophyll a concentration.[Conclusion] The eutrophication status of Baoan Lake water is good. Further improvement in the water nutritional status of Baoan Lake can be achieved by controlling the agricultural non-point source pollution
strengthening the management of rivers
regulating water level
recovering aquatic vegetation
and so on.
秦珊,崔建升,申立娜,等.富营养化对湖泊消费者群落碳源和氮源的影响:以白洋淀为例[J].湖泊科学,2020,32(6):1657-1670.
Du Huibin, Chen Zhenni, Mao Guozhu, et al. Evaluation of eutrophication in freshwater lakes:A new non-equilibrium statistical approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,102(7):686-692.
施玉齐,吴晓东,葛绪广,等.城市湖泊富营养化及氮磷平衡研究:以湖北省黄石市青山湖1湖区为例[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(3):208-215.
郑科俊.黄石市主要地表水体环境质量现状分析及污染防治措施[J].湖北师范学院学报(自然科学版),2014,34(1):54-57.
杨杰峰,杜丹,田思思,等.湖北省典型湖泊湿地生物多样性评价研究[J].水生态学杂志,2017,38(3):15-22.
孟睿,何连生,过龙根,等.长江中下游草型湖泊浮游植物群落及其与环境因子的典范对应分析[J].环境科学,2013,34(7):2588-2596.
刘梅芳,裴国凤.长江中游湖泊浮游植物的群落结构特征[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(3):487-489.
贺方兵.东部浅水湖泊水生态系统健康状态评估研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2015.
张水元,刘瑞秋,黎道丰.保安湖沉积物和间隙水中氮和磷的含量及其分布[J].水生生物学报,2000,24(5):434-438.
孙宏亮,孙运海,郜志云,等.大冶保安湖底泥重金属分布及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境污染与防治,2016,38(2):111.
湖北省生态环境厅.湖北省生态环境状况公报[EB/OL]. (2009-03-03)[2021-09-05].https://www.sthjt.hubei.gov.cn.
王翠明,刘雪芹,张建辉.湖泊富营养化评价方法及分级标准[J].中国环境监测,2002,18(5):47-49.
张涛,陈求稳,易齐涛,等.太湖流域上游平原河网区水质空间差异与季节变化特征[J].湖泊科学,2017,29(6):1300-1311.
丁洋,赵进勇,张晶,等.松花湖水质空间差异及富营养化空间自相关分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(5):2232-2239.
全栋,史小红,赵胜男,等.2006-2017年乌梁素海夏季水体营养状态及影响因子[J].湖泊科学,2019,31(5):1259-1267.
胡传林,黄翔飞.保安湖渔业生态和渔业开发技术研究文集[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
梁彦龄,刘伙泉.草型湖泊资源、环境与渔业生态学管理(1)[C].北京:科学出版社,1995.
马凯,蔡庆华,谢志才,等.沉水植物分布格局对湖泊水环境N, P因子影响[J].水生生物学报,2003,27(3):232-237.
Tim S, Paul A B. Phytoplankton production in a large, regulated river:A modeling and mass balance assessment[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2003,48(4):1476-1487.
史静,于秀芳,夏运生,等.影响富营养化湖泊底泥氮、磷释放的因素[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):241-244.
杨赵.湖泊沉积物中氮磷源:汇现象影响因素研究进展[J].环境科学导刊,2017,36(S1):16-19,29.
蔡阳,陆欣鑫,巴秋爽,等.镜泊湖春、夏两季浮游生物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].海洋与湖沼,2019,50(1):116-128.
Zhao Yongqiang, Xia Yongqiu, Ti Chaopu, et al. Nitrogen removal capacity of the river network in a high nitrogen loading region[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015,49(3):1427-1435.
刘正文,张修峰,陈非洲,等.浅水湖泊底栖-敞水生境耦合对富营养化的响应与稳态转换机理:对湖泊修复的启示[J].湖泊科学,2020,32(1):1-10.
王洪铸,王海军,李艳,等.湖泊富营养化治理:集中控磷,或氮磷皆控?[J].水生生物学报,2020,44(5):938-960.
Li Yan, Wang Hongzhu, Liang Xiaomin, et al. Total phytoplankton abundance is determined by phosphorus input:Evidencefrom an 18-month fertilization experiment in four sub-tropical ponds[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 2017(74):1454-1461.
王海军,王洪铸.富营养化治理应放宽控氮、集中控磷[J].自然科学进展,2009,19(6):599-604.
朱广伟,秦伯强,张运林,等.2005-2017年北部太湖水体叶绿素a和营养盐变化及影响因素[J].湖泊科学,2018,30(2):279-295.
黄小龙,郭艳敏,张毅敏,等.沉水植物对湖泊沉积物氮磷内源负荷的控制及应用[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(12):1524-1530.
Xue Wei, Lu Shaoyong. Effects of inactivation agents and temperature on phosphorus release from sediment in Dianchi Lake, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015,74(5):3857-3865.
王洪铸,刘学勤,王海军.长江河流-泛滥平原生态系统面临的威胁与整体保护对策[J].水生生物学报,2019,43(S1):157-182.
朱广伟,许海,朱梦圆,等.三十年来长江中下游湖泊富营养化状况变迁及其影响因素[J].湖泊科学,2019,31(6):1510-1524.
严广寒,殷雪妍,汪星,等.基于GAM模型的洞庭湖叶绿素a浓度与环境因子相关性分析[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(1):313-322.
Xie Liqiang, Xie Ping, Tang Huijuan. Enhancement of dissolved phosphorus release from sediment to lake water by microcystis blooms:An enclosure experiment in a hyper-eutrophic, subtropical Chinese lake[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2003,122(3):391-399.
0
浏览量
586
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621