基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”的黄土高原生态屏障带生态空间网络构建

刘泓君; 牛腾; 于强; 马骏; 杨林哲; 苏凯

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”的黄土高原生态屏障带生态空间网络构建

试验研究

- 基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”的黄土高原生态屏障带生态空间网络构建
- Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Ecological Barrier Zone of Loess Plateau Based on “Importance-Sensitivity-Landscape Features”
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第3期页码：103-111
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学精准林业北京市重点实验室,北京,100083
  2. 广西大学林学院,广西,南宁,530005
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“植被恢复格局对防风固沙生态屏障效应的影响机制研究”（42001211）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.015
  中图分类号： X171.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘泓君, 牛腾, 于强, 等. 基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”的黄土高原生态屏障带生态空间网络构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):103-111.

Liu Hongjun, Niu Teng, Yu Qiang, et al. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Ecological Barrier Zone of Loess Plateau Based on “Importance-Sensitivity-Landscape Features”[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 103-111.
刘泓君, 牛腾, 于强, 等. 基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”的黄土高原生态屏障带生态空间网络构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):103-111. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.015.

Liu Hongjun, Niu Teng, Yu Qiang, et al. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Ecological Barrier Zone of Loess Plateau Based on “Importance-Sensitivity-Landscape Features”[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 103-111. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.015.

摘要

[目的

]

分析生态空间网络结构与土壤保持量的关系，为提升黄土高原屏障区生态系统服务提供对策与建议。[方法

]

本研究从生态系统服务重要性、生态敏感性、景观稳定性三方面，识别生态源地，构建生态空间网络，并分析生态空间网络拓扑结构与土壤保持量的关系。[结果

]

①西南秦岭一带水源涵养量高，吕梁山脉西侧—黄龙山东侧及子午岭西侧的区县土壤保持量低，秦岭及子午岭主脊东侧生物多样性高。西部地区生态环境较敏感，区域整体景观格局较稳定。②生态源地总面积为46 245 km

，占全区的38.8%；生态廊道共125条，共长9 071.40 km。③生态节点共142个，源地节点的度与土壤保持量呈正相关。[结论

]

基于“重要性—敏感性—景观特征”构建的生态空间网络准确可行，应重点加强对薄弱节点及度值较低的源地节点的建设，使生态用地的土壤保持服务发挥更大的生态效益。

Abstract

[Objective] The relationship between ecological spatial network structure and soil conservation was analyzed in order to provide countermeasures and suggestions for improving ecosystem services in the Loess Plateau barrier region.[Methods] Based on the importance of ecosystem services

ecological sensitivity

and landscape stability

the ecological source area was identified

an ecological space network was constructed

and the relationship between the ecological space network topology and the amount of soil conservation was analyzed.[Results] ① Water conservation was high in the Qinling Mountains in Southwest China. The districts and counties on the west side of the Luliang Mountain Range-Huanglong Mountain

and the west side of the Ziwuling Mountains had low soil conservation. The Qinling Mountains and the east side of the main ridge of the Ziwuling Mountains had high biodiversity. The ecological environment in the western region was more sensitive

and the overall landscape pattern of the region was relatively stable. ② The total area of ecological source area was 46 245 km2

accounting for 38.8% of the entire area. There were 125 ecological corridors with a total length of 9 071.40 km. ③ There were a total of 142 ecological nodes

and the degree of the source node was positively correlated with the amount of soil conservation.[Conclusion] The ecological space network based on "importance-sensitivity-landscape characteristics" was accurate and feasible. The construction of weak nodes and source nodes with low degree values should be strengthened so that the soil conservation services of ecological land can exert greater ecological benefits.

关键词

Keywords

references

尹礼唱, 王晓峰, 张琨, 等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究, 2019, 38(9):2162-2172.

Sun Meiying, Li Xiuhong, Yang Rongjin, et al.Comprehensive partitions and different strategies based on ecological security and economic development in Guizhou Province, China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 274:122794.

Kong Fanhua, Yin Haiwei, Nakagoshi N, et al.Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation:Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 95(1/2):16-27.

俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(1):8-15.

马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等.区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(4):761-768.

彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等.区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J].地理研究, 2017, 36(3):407-419.

张美丽, 李智, 张益琛, 等.基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别:以河北省阜平县为例[J].水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3):299-307.

杜悦悦, 胡熠娜, 杨旸, 等.基于生态重要性和敏感性的西南山地生态安全格局构建:以云南省大理白族自治州为例[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8241-8253.

崔宁, 于恩逸, 李爽, 等.基于生态系统敏感性与生态功能重要性的高原湖泊分区保护研究:以达里湖流域为例[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(3):949-958.

王浩, 马星, 杜勇.基于生态系统服务重要性和生态敏感性的广东省生态安全格局构建[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(5):1705-1715.

周汝波, 林媚珍, 吴卓, 等.基于生态系统服务重要性的粤港澳大湾区生态安全格局构建[J].生态经济, 2020, 36(7):189-196.

俞孔坚, 李海龙, 李迪华, 等.国土尺度生态安全格局[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(10):5163-5175.

许峰, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等.基于MSPA与最小路径方法的巴中西部新城生态网络构建[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(19):6425-6434.

杨姗姗, 邹长新, 沈渭寿, 等.基于生态红线划分的生态安全格局构建:以江西省为例[J].生态学杂志, 2016, 35(1):250-258.

Fu Yangjun, Shi Xueyi, He Juan, et al.Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern:A case study in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112:106030.

景永才, 陈利顶, 孙然好.基于生态系统服务供需的城市群生态安全格局构建框架[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4121-4131.

吴健生, 岳新欣, 秦维.基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建:以重庆两江新区为例[J].地理研究, 2017, 36(3):429-440.

赵文祯, 韩增林, 闫晓露, 等.基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建:以大连市瓦房店为例[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3):546-562.

Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S.Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices:Towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation[J].Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21(7):959-967.

李云, 张艳芳, 田茂, 等.基于"重要性-敏感性-冲突性"的陕北生态保护重点区域辨识[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(3):643-653.

王忠静, 张子雄, 索滢.干旱区凝结水评估及对水量平衡方程影响[J].水利学报, 2019, 50(6):710-720.

曹文旭, 张志强, 查同刚, 等.基于Budyko假设的潮河流域气候和植被变化对实际蒸散发的影响研究[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5750-5758.

龚诗涵, 肖洋, 方瑜, 等.中国森林生态系统地表径流调节特征[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7472-7478.

Bai Yang, Ochuodho T O, Yang Jian.Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA[J].Ecological Indicators, 2019, 102:51-64.

李晶, 李红艳, 张良.关中-天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(10):3053-3062.

谢余初, 巩杰, 齐姗姗, 等.基于综合指数法的白龙江流域生物多样性空间分异特征研究[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(19):6448-6456.

高梦雯, 胡业翠, 李向, 等.基于生态系统服务重要性和环境敏感性的喀斯特山区生态安全格局构建:以广西河池为例[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(7):2596-2608.

陈利顶, 傅伯杰.干扰的类型、特征及其生态学意义[J].生态学报, 2000, 20(4):581-586.

Taylor P D, Fahrig L, Henein K, et al.Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure[J].Oikos, 1993, 68(3):571.

杨天荣, 匡文慧, 刘卫东, 等.基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局[J].地理研究, 2017, 36(3):441-452.

Miao Zouhua, Pan Lei, Wang Qiaozhi, et al.Research on urban ecological network under the threat of road networks:A case study of Wuhan[J].ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(8):342.

于强, 杨斓, 岳德鹏, 等.基于复杂网络分析法的空间生态网络结构研究[J].农业机械学报, 2018, 49(3):214-224.

浏览量

777

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土高原退耕还林工程中的现存问题及有关建议

淤地坝系试点示范建设浅见

黄土高原南部丘陵沟壑区果畜沼复合经营模式生态经济效益分析

黄土高原上黄试区土地利用适宜性评价

不同雨强下各生育期玉米坡耕地的侵蚀产沙研究