白马河流域除草剂及其代谢产物的时空分布特征与生态风险评价

叶敦雨; 孙小银; 赵忠强; 孙佳瑶

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

白马河流域除草剂及其代谢产物的时空分布特征与生态风险评价

试验研究

- 白马河流域除草剂及其代谢产物的时空分布特征与生态风险评价
- Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Ecological Risk Assessment for Herbicide and Its Metabolites in Baima River
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第3期页码：74-81
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 曲阜师范大学地理与旅游学院,山东,日照,276826
  2. 南四湖湿地生态与环境保护山东省高校重点实验室,山东,日照,276826
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  山东自然科学基金项目“南四湖流域地表水农药污染对土地利用及其景观格局的响应机制研究”（ZR2021MD088）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.011
  中图分类号： X171.5
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
叶敦雨, 孙小银, 赵忠强, 等. 白马河流域除草剂及其代谢产物的时空分布特征与生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):74-81.

Ye Dunyu, Sun Xiaoyin, Zhao Zhongqiang, et al. Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Ecological Risk Assessment for Herbicide and Its Metabolites in Baima River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 74-81.
叶敦雨, 孙小银, 赵忠强, 等. 白马河流域除草剂及其代谢产物的时空分布特征与生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):74-81. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.011.

Ye Dunyu, Sun Xiaoyin, Zhao Zhongqiang, et al. Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Ecological Risk Assessment for Herbicide and Its Metabolites in Baima River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 74-81. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.011.

摘要

[目的] 探讨典型除草剂阿特拉津（ATR）及其代谢产物脱乙基阿特拉津（DEA）、脱异丙基阿特拉津（DIA）在作物生长季（6—9月）的污染特征以及时空变化，为农业小流域除草剂的管理、使用与保护决策提供科学依据。[方法] 在白马河流域沿程设立18个采样点，基于实地监测和室内分析，探讨污染物的时空变化特征，并运用熵值法进行生态风险评价。[结果] ①所有采集水样中均有ATR及代谢产物检出，其中ATR在6—7月的地表水样中100%检出，8—9月检出率稍有下降，代谢产物DEA，DIA在前两月检出率较低，后两月检出率增加。②白马河污染物空间分布表明，各污染物浓度最高值大多出现于河流上游和中游，下游浓度均相对较低。这可能与河流下游河道宽阔、水流量大、稀释作用较强有关。③生态风险评价结果显示ATR，DEA和DIA风险等级均为中等，其原因是该河流的水负荷低，稀释能力不足。[结论] 相对于大流域，白马河作为典型农业流域的小支流，水量小、稀释能力不足，造成污染的生态风险高于许多大流域。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatio-temporal variations of a typical herbicide (atrazine

ATR) and its degradation products[deethylatrazine (DEA) and deisopropylatrazine (DIA)] during the crop growing season (June to September) was investigated in order to provide scientific supports for management

usage

and protection of herbicides in a small agricultural watershed.[Methods] Eighteen sampling sites were designated along the Baima River

and the spatio-temporal dynamics of pollutants were obtained through the combined methods of field monitoring and lab analysis. Ecological risk was evaluated by the risk of herbicides quotient method.[Results] ① ATR and its metabolites were detected in all of the collected water samples. ATR detection rates in surface water samples in June and July were higher than those in August and September. However

the detection rates of metabolites including DEA and DIA were low in the first two months and increased in the later two months. ② The spatial distribution of herbicide pollution in the Baima River showed that the maximum values of pollutants mainly occurred in the upper and middle reaches of the river. The concentration levels in the lower reaches were relatively low

which may be attributed to the wide river channel

large water flow

and strong dilution effect in the lower reaches of the river. ③ The risk levels of ATR

DEA

and DIA for the entire river were all at the moderate level due to low water load and insufficient dilution capacity of the river.[Conclusion] Compared with larger watersheds

the Baima River

as a small tributary of typical agricultural watersheds

has small water volume and insufficient dilution capacity that results in higher ecological pollution risks than many larger basins.

关键词

Keywords

references

李博.土壤中阿特拉津环境行为及降解转化研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2017, 42(5):141-145.

Yang Xiaoyan, Wei Huanyu, Zhu Changxiong, et al.Biodegradation of atrazine by the novel Citricoccus sp.strain TT3[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 147:144-150.

蔺中, 张倩, 李文清, 等.土壤阿特拉津的生物修复机制的研究[J].科技资讯, 2018, 16(11):116-117.

沈佳伦, 邓艳玲, 张安平, 等.脱乙基阿特拉津和脱异丙基阿特拉津在两种旱地土壤中的消解动态及影响因素[J].环境化学, 2020, 39(2):448-454.

陈建军, 何月秋, 祖艳群, 等.除草剂阿特拉津的生态风险与植物修复研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(S1):289-293.

Rhine E D, Fuhrmann J J, Radosevich M.Microbial community responses to atrazine exposure and nutrient availability:Linking degradation capacity to community structure[J].Microbial Ecology, 2003, 46(2):145-160.

任晋, 蒋可.官厅水库水中莠去津及其降解产物残留的分析[J].分析试验室, 2004, 23(12):17-20.

Liu Zhenzhen, Fu Zhengwei, Jin Yuanxiang.Immunotoxic effects of atrazine and its main metabolites at environmental relevant concentrations on larval zebrafish (Danio rerio)[J].Chemosphere, 2017, 166:212-220.

沈佳伦.阿特拉津对大豆的胁迫机制及其降解产物的消解动态研究[D].浙江杭州:浙江工业大学, 2020.

Campbell J L, Andersen M E, Hinderliter P M, et al.PBPK model for atrazine and its chlorotriazine metabolites in rat and human[J].Toxicological Sciences, 2016, 150(2):441-453.

Paerl H W, Hall N S, Hounshell A G, et al.Recent increase in catastrophic tropical cyclone flooding in coastal North Carolina, USA:Long-term observations suggest a regime shift[J].Scientific Reports, 2019, 9:10620.

Beaulieu J J, DelSontro T, Downing J A.Eutrophication will increase methane emissions from lakes and impoundments during the 21st century[J].Nature Communications, 2019, 10:1375.

Turner R E, Rabalais N N.Coastal eutrophication near the Mississippi River delta[J].Nature, 1994, 368(6472):619-621.

李清波, 黄国宏, 王颜红, 等.阿特拉津生态风险及其检测和修复技术研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 2002, 13(5):625-628.

司友斌, 孟雪梅.除草剂阿特拉津的环境行为及其生态修复研究进展[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2007, 34(3):451-455.

塔娜, 冯建芳, 孙成, 等.太湖梅粱湾水体中阿特拉津的毛细管气相色谱法测定[J].环境污染与防治, 2005, 27(8):634-636.

任晋, 蒋可, 周怀东.官厅水库水中阿特拉津残留的分析及污染来源[J].环境科学, 2002, 23(1):126-128.

严登华, 何岩, 王浩.东辽河流域地表水体中Atrazine的环境特征[J].环境科学, 2005, 26(3):203-208.

Cai Zongwei, Wang Dongli, Ma W T.Gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry applied for the analysis of triazine herbicides in environmental waters by an isotope dilution technique[J].Analytica Chimica Acta, 2004, 503(2):263-270.

国家环境保护总局, 水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版, 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.

Sun Xiaoyin, Liu Fei, Shan Ruifeng, et al.Spatiotemporal distributions of Cu, Zn, metribuzin, atrazine, and their transformation products in the surface water of a small plain stream in Eastern China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191(7):433.

智昕, 牛军峰, 唐阵武, 等.长江水系武汉段典型有机氯农药的生态风险评价[J].环境科学学报, 2008, 28(1):168-173.

赵建亮, 应光国, 魏东斌, 等.水体和沉积物中毒害污染物的生态风险评价方法体系研究进展[J].生态毒理学报, 2011, 6(6):577-588.

United States Environmental Protection Agency.Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment.EPA/630/R-695/002 F.[R].Washington D C:Usepa, 1998.

Ren Wenjie, Wang Meie, Zhou Qixing.Effect of soil pH and organic matter on desorption hysteresis of chlorimuron-ethyl in two typical Chinese soils[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2011, 11(4):552-561.

高樱红.降水离子浓度总和与电导率的关系[J].化学分析计量, 2002, 11(2):62-63.

周光益, 田大伦, 邱治军, 等.广州市流溪河降水离子浓度与电导率关系[J].生态科学, 2009, 28(5):465-470.

Mahler B J, van Metre P C, Burley T E, et al.Similarities and differences in occurrence and temporal fluctuations in glyphosate and atrazine in small Midwestern streams (USA) during the 2013 growing season[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579:149-158.

Xing Zisheng, Chow L, Cook A, et al.Pesticide application and detection in variable agricultural intensity watersheds and their river systems in the maritime region of Canada[J].Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2012, 63(4):471-483.

Barizon R R M, de Oliveira Figueiredo R, de Souza Dutra D R C, et al.Pesticides in the surface waters of the Camanducaia River watershed, Brazil[J].Journal of Environmental Science and Health(Part B), 2020, 55(3):283-292.

Ouyang Wei, Cai Guanqing, Tysklind M, et al.Temporal-spatial patterns of three types of pesticide loadings in a middle-high latitude agricultural watershed[J].Water Research, 2017, 122:377-386.

郭强, 田慧, 毛潇萱, 等.珠江河口水域有机磷农药水生生态系统风险评价[J].环境科学, 2014, 35(3):1029-1034.

浏览量

680

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

石头口门水库饮用水水源地生态风险评价

昌黎黄金海岸国家级自然保护区土地利用生态风险评价

淮南煤矿复垦区土壤重金属含量分布及潜在生态风险评价

石羊河流域植被生态系统生态风险评价研究

焦化厂周边土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价