中南林业科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南,长沙,410004
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
于师, 李珍玉, 王梦珂, 等. 不同种植间距对香根草植物边坡优先流发育特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):49-56.
Yu Shi, Li Zhenyu, Wang Mengke, et al. Effects of Different Plant Spacings on Preferential Flow Development Characteristics of Vetiver Plant Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 49-56.
于师, 李珍玉, 王梦珂, 等. 不同种植间距对香根草植物边坡优先流发育特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):49-56. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.008.
Yu Shi, Li Zhenyu, Wang Mengke, et al. Effects of Different Plant Spacings on Preferential Flow Development Characteristics of Vetiver Plant Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 49-56. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.008.
[目的] 分析优先流在香根草边坡中的发育特征,研究植物根系与优先流之间的关系,为进一步研究降雨条件下植物根系对边坡土体稳定性的影响提供理论依据。[方法] 以种植间距为50 cm和10 cm的香根草为研究对象,模拟30 mm和50 mm两种不同的降雨量,采用示踪剂试验研究了香根草边坡土壤的优先流发育特征。[结果] 香根草种植间距从50 cm减少到10 cm会增大边坡的水力响应。在50 mm的降雨量作用下,10 cm种植间距的香根草边坡土壤的染色面积比率和优先流比分别是50 cm的1.55,1.76倍。表层土0—10 cm土层深度范围内染色路径数量变化不明显,在10—35 cm深度土层范围,10 cm种植间距的染色路径数量多于50 cm种植间距的香根草边坡土壤。当降雨量由30 mm增加至50 mm时,水流会通过优势通道更迅速迁移到边坡土壤中。降雨量为30 mm土壤的染色面积比率(36.11%)和优先流比(67.25%)小于50 mm土壤的染色面积比率(49.68%)和优先流比(79.96%),并且染色路径数量随着降雨量的增加而增多。[结论] 香根草根系特征与优先流关系密切。选择植物护坡时,应合理选择植物的种植间距,使根系护坡在力学效应和水文效应上最大化。
[Objective] The development characteristics of preferential flow for a vetiver slope and the relationship between vetiver roots and preferential flow were analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for further study on the influence of plant roots on slope soil stability under varying rainfall conditions.[Methods] Preferential flow on a vetiver slope was studied by using a dye tracer test with simulated rainfall amounts of 30 mm and 50 mm
and plant spacings of 50 cm and 10 cm.[Results] The hydraulic response of the slope soil was greatly increased when vetiver plant spacing was reduced from 50 cm to 10 cm. Under the action of 50 mm of rainfall
the dyeing area ratio and preferential flow ratio for the 10 cm plant spacing were 1.55 and 1.76 times of those for the 50 cm plant spacing
respectively. There was no obvious change in the number of dyeing paths within the topsoil depth range of 0-10 cm. In the topsoil depth range of 10-35 cm
the number of dyeing paths with the 10 cm plant spacing was more than that of the vetiver slope soil with the 50 cm plant spacing. When rainfall was increased from 30 mm to 50 mm
the water flow migrated more quickly into the sloped soil through the dominant channel. The dyeing area ratio (36.11%) and preferential flow ratio (67.25%) with 30 mm rainfall was less than the dyeing area ratio (49.68%) and preferential flow ratio (79.96%) with 50 mm rainfall. The number of dyed paths increased with increasing rainfall.[Conclusion] The root characteristics of vetiver were closely related to preferential flow. When selecting plant slope protection
reasonable plant spacing should be selected to maximize the mechanical and hydrological effects of root slope protection.
Maffra C, Sousa Rita, Sutili F, et al.The effect of roots on the shear strength of texturally distinct soils[J].Floresta e Ambiente, 2019, 26(3):1-11.
Ng C W W, Leung A K.Measurements of drying and wetting permeability functions using a new stress-controllable soil column[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(1):58-68.
Meng Suyun, Zhao Guoqing, Yang Yuyou.Experimental study on influence of vegetation roots on hydraulic characteristics of slope under rainfall[J].Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2021, 1838(1):012057.
徐宗恒, 徐则民, 官琦, 等.不同植被发育斜坡土体优先流特征[J].山地学报, 2012, 30(5):521-527.
张英虎, 牛健植, 朱蔚利, 等.森林生态系统林木根系对优先流的影响[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(6):1788-1797.
Ghestem M, Sidle R C, Stokes A.The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow:Implications for slope stability[J].BioScience, 2011, 61(11):869-879.
Tang Qicheng, Duncan J M, Guo Li, et al.On the controls of preferential flow in soils of different hillslope position and lithological origin[J].Hydrological Processes, 2020, 34(22):4295-4306.
Shao Wei, Ni Junjun, Leung A K, et al.Analysis of plant root-induced preferential flow and pore-water pressure variation by a dual-permeability model[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(11):1537-1552.
Ng C W W, Ni J J, Leung A K, et al.Effects of planting density on tree growth and induced soil suction[J].Géotechnique, 2016, 66(9):711-724.
潘网生, 许玉凤, 卢玉东, 等.基于非均匀性和分形维数的黄土优先流特征定量分析[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(3):140-147.
张家明.植被发育斜坡非饱和带土体大孔隙对降雨入渗影响研究[D].云南昆明:昆明理工大学, 2013.
张宪政.作物生理研究法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1992.
Bargués Tobella A, Reese H, Almaw A, et al.The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Burkina Faso[J].Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(4):3342-3354.
于元芬.不同植被覆盖下红壤优先流特征与影响因素研究[D].湖北武汉:华中农业大学, 2020.
李珍玉, 王丽锋, 肖宏彬, 等.香根草根系在公路边坡土体中的分布特征[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2017, 25(1):102-112.
侯芳, 杨志, 程金花, 等.永定河(北京段)滨河带藤本和次生乔木林土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3):143-149.
韩巧玲, 柏浩, 赵玥, 等.采用染色示踪技术的土壤优先流自动分割与量化系统[J].农业工程学报, 2021, 37(6):127-134.
骆紫藤.华北土石山区典型林地根土层优先流特征及其影响因素研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
邵一敏, 赵洋毅, 段旭, 等.金沙江干热河谷典型林草地植物根系对土壤优先流的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3):725-734.
王泽鹏.半干旱土石山区香根草根系抗拉力学特性研究[J].人民黄河, 2018, 40(9):93-95.
0
浏览量
905
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621