1. 广西大学 农学院,广西,南宁,530004
2. 广西壮族自治区水土保持监测站,广西,南宁,530023
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
陈钊柱, 蔡卓杰, 谢福倩, 等. 自然降雨对广西赤红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):36-42.
Chen Zhaozhu, Cai Zhuojie, Xie Fuqian, et al. Effects of Natural Rainfall on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Lateritic Red Soil Slope in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 36-42.
陈钊柱, 蔡卓杰, 谢福倩, 等. 自然降雨对广西赤红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):36-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.006.
Chen Zhaozhu, Cai Zhuojie, Xie Fuqian, et al. Effects of Natural Rainfall on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Lateritic Red Soil Slope in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 36-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.006.
[目的] 探讨自然降雨对赤红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响,为赤红壤地区水土保持综合治理提供理论依据。[方法] 基于野外径流小区原位观测试验,测定2020年5—10月次降雨下广西壮族自治区赤红壤坡耕地(蔗地)、撂荒地和裸地的产流产沙量,结合降雨特征分析,探讨降雨特征及分布对赤红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响。[结果] ①2020年5—10月,坡面径流和侵蚀量整体上表现为:裸地>蔗地>撂荒地,不同处理下坡面径流和侵蚀均主要集中在8月,其中撂荒地径流和侵蚀各月差异相对较小。②不同处理次降雨降雨量与坡面径流量和侵蚀量呈极显著的正相关关系,降雨历时显著影响蔗地和撂荒地坡面径流量。中雨和暴雨降雨等级占观测期内侵蚀性降雨总量的70.9%,其产生的径流量占蔗地、裸地和撂荒地处理坡面径流量的68.2%,78.6%和67.8%;暴雨降雨等级是坡面侵蚀量的主要来源,占不同处理下总侵蚀量的63.8%~83.4%。[结论] 在广西壮族自治区的赤红壤坡地区域,与裸地相比,蔗地和撂荒地能够有效减小坡面产流产沙量,且撂荒地的降低效果更为明显;降雨量是影响坡面产流产沙最关键的因子,中雨和暴雨降雨等级是坡面径流和侵蚀的主要来源,坡面径流和侵蚀分布特征受降雨分布和降雨频次等因素的综合影响。
[Objective] The effects of natural rainfall on soil erosion characteristics of sloping lateritic soil was analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for the comprehensive management of soil and water conservation in a lateritic soil area.[Methods] Based on in-situ observations from runoff plots
runoff amounts and sediment yields under erosive rainfall events from May to October 2020 for sloping farmland (cropped to sugarcane)
abandoned land
and bare land in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were analyzed
and combined with rainfall characteristics to determine the effects of rainfall characteristics and distribution on soil erosion characteristics of sloping soil.[Results] ① During the observation period
runoff amounts and sediment yields under different treatments followed the order of bare land>sugarcane land>abandoned land. Runoff amounts and sediment yields under all treatments were concentrated in August. Monthly differences for runoff amounts and sediment yields in abandoned land were relatively small. ② Runoff amounts and sediment yields were significantly related to rainfall amounts for all treatments. Only rainfall duration had significant positive correlations to runoff amounts for sugarcane land and abandoned land. Moderate rain and heavy rain accounted for 70.9% of the total erosive rainfall amounts. For the sugarcane land
bare land
and abandoned land treatments
the main sources of runoff were moderate rain and heavy rain
which accounted for 68.2%
78.6%
and 67.8%
respectively
of the total runoff. Erosion was mainly caused by heavy rain
accounting for 63.8%~83.4% of the total amount of erosion.[Conclusion] For a lateritic red soil slope in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
sugarcane land and abandoned land effectively reduced runoff and sediment yield on the slope more than bare land
and the reduction effect was more significant for abandoned land. Rainfall amount was the most important rainfall characteristic affecting runoff and sediment yields. Moderate rain and heavy rain were the mainly sources of runoff sediment yields. The distribution characteristics of runoff and erosion on slopes were influenced by rainfall distribution and rainfall frequency.
Liang Yue, Jiao Juying, Tang Bingzhe, et al.Response of runoff and soil erosion to erosive rainstorm events and vegetation restoration on abandoned slope farmland in the Loess Plateau region, China[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 584:124694.
张晶晶, 王力.黄土高原高塬沟壑区坡面表层土壤水分研究[J].水土保持通报, 2011, 31(1):93-97.
Wang Zhijie, Jiao Juying, Rayburg S, et al.Soil erosion resistance of "Grain for Green" vegetation types under extreme rainfall conditions on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena, 2016, 141:109-116.
Dunkerley D.Effects of rainfall intensity fluctuations on infiltration and runoff:Rainfall simulation on dryland soils, Fowlers Gap, Australia[J].Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26(15):2211-2224.
林锦阔, 李子君, 许海超, 等.降雨因子对沂蒙山区不同土地利用方式径流小区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2016, 36(5):7-12.
卫伟, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区降水特征值和下垫面因子影响下的水土流失规律[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(11):3847-3853.
孙从建, 侯慧新, 陈伟, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型农作物产流产沙效应研究[J].水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2):99-103.
肖继兵, 孙占祥, 蒋春光, 等.辽西地区农耕坡地土壤侵蚀影响因素及相关关系[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5):13-19.
任雨之, 郑江坤, 付滟, 等.不同耕种模式下降雨等级对紫色土坡耕地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(3):90-98.
陈美淇, 张卓栋, 王晓岚, 等.西南黄壤和西北黄土坡面侵蚀产沙规律比较研究[J].中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(6):53-60.
张彩云, 蒋勇军, 马丽娜, 等.岩溶槽谷区不同土地利用方式下的坡地产流产沙规律[J].水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1):49-55.
胡伟, 翟星雨, 李浩, 等.黑土区农地集水区次降雨径流与输沙特征研究[J].土壤与作物, 2019, 8(4):405-414.
郑江坤, 杨帆, 王文武, 等.不同降雨等级下耕作措施对坡地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(1):38-45.
Wei Linhong, Zhang Bin, Wang Mingzhu.Effects of antecedent soil moisture on runoff and soil erosion in alley cropping systems[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2007, 94(1/2/3):54-62.
殷水清, 薛筱婵, 岳天雨, 等.中国降雨侵蚀力的时空分布及重现期研究[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(9):105-113.
Zhang Baojun, Zhang Guanghui, Yang Hanyue, et al.Soil erodibility affected by vegetation restoration on steep gully slopes on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Soil Research, 2018, 56(7):712.
肖继兵, 孙占祥, 刘志, 等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(22):159-166.
马璠.作物植被对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2009.
马波, 吴发启, 马璠.种植大豆地表土壤溅蚀效应及其空间分布特征[J].土壤学报, 2013, 50(1):50-58.
朱司航, 王红, 周大迈, 等.石灰岩地不同作物坡面土壤侵蚀和养分流失的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):12-18.
马传功, 陈建军, 郭先华, 等.坡耕地不同种植模式对农田水土保持效应及土壤养分流失的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2016, 33(1):72-79.
罗兴录, 樊吴静, 杨鑫.不同作物种植垦作对水土流失影响研究[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(36):232-236.
周一帆, 杨林生, 孟博, 等.中国甘蔗主产区产量差及影响因素分析[J].中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11):2377-2388.
赵其国, 黄国勤.广西红壤[M].北京:中国环境出版社, 2014.
中华人民共和国水利部.水土保持监测设施通用技术条件SL342-2006[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2006.
水利部.水土保持试验规程:SL 419-2008[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2008.
刘洁, 陈晓宏, 许振成, 等.降雨变化对东江流域径流的影响模拟分析[J].地理科学, 2015, 35(4):483-490.
杨任翔, 邱凡, 王坚桦, 等.雨型和甘蔗种植对赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):65-70.
王全九, 赵光旭, 刘艳丽, 等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14):195-201.
沈紫燕, 王辉, 平李娜, 等.前期土壤含水量对粘性红壤产流产沙及溶质运移的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2014, 28(1):58-62.
张向炎, 史学正, 于东升, 等.前期土壤含水量对红壤坡面产流产沙特性的影响[J].水科学进展, 2010, 21(1):23-29.
赵娅君, 吴发启, 徐宁, 等.不同雨强下各生育期玉米坡耕地的侵蚀产沙研究[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6):23-28.
李桂芳, 杨任翔, 谢福倩, 等.不同土地利用方式下赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):101-107.
张思毅, 梁志权, 谢真越, 等.植被调控红壤坡面土壤侵蚀机理[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):1-5.
周晗, 严俊霞, 李洪建, 等.晋西黄土区坡耕地不同下垫面水土流失对侵蚀性降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究, 2019, 26(4):7-12.
0
浏览量
671
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621