兰州大学 资源环境学院,甘肃,兰州,730000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
安克俭, 魏霞, 贺燕, 等. 祁连山区4种高寒植被类型下土壤养分及含水率分布[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):16-22.
An Kejian, Wei Xia, He Yan, et al. Soil Moisture Content and Nutrient Distribution Under Four Alpine Vegetation Types in Qilian Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 16-22.
安克俭, 魏霞, 贺燕, 等. 祁连山区4种高寒植被类型下土壤养分及含水率分布[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(3):16-22. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.003.
An Kejian, Wei Xia, He Yan, et al. Soil Moisture Content and Nutrient Distribution Under Four Alpine Vegetation Types in Qilian Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 16-22. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.003.
[目的] 探究祁连山区土壤养分及含水率分布特征,为祁连山区水土保持和生态植被恢复提供参考。[方法] 以高寒草甸、高山灌丛、温性草原、温性荒漠4种高寒植被类型土壤为研究对象,采用野外调查、室内试验及数理统计相结合的方法,研究了4种植被类型下不同土层深度和4种坡向下土壤有机质(SOM)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)、含水率(SMC)分布特征,及其与年平均气温、年累积降雨量之间的相关性。[结果] ①研究区SOM含量范围为1.85~190.31 mg/g,TN含量为0.07~7.99 mg/g,TP含量为0.24~1.81 mg/g,SMC为0.79%~73.21%。②土壤SOM,TN,TP,SMC含量差异主要受植被类型影响,不同植被类型土壤SOM,SMC含量大小顺序均为:高寒草甸>高山灌丛>温性草原>温性荒漠;TN含量:高山灌丛>高寒草甸>温性草原>温性荒漠;TP含量:温性草原>高寒草甸>高山灌丛>温性荒漠。在4种坡向中,TP含量在半阴坡最高,阳坡最低,SOM,TN,SMC含量在半阳坡最高。③SOM,TN,TP,SMC与年累积降雨量极显著正相关(p<0.01),SOM,SMC与年平均气温均为极显著负相关(p<0.01),TN含量与年平均气温显著负相关(p<0.05)。[结论] 祁连山区水土保持和生态植被恢复措施的布设可优先考虑在半阳坡、高寒草甸和高山灌丛区域,因地制宜地促进生态系统物质良性循环。
[Objective] The distribution characteristics of soil nutrients and soil moisture content (SMC) in the Qilian Mountains were explored in order to provide references for soil and water conservation and ecological vegetation restoration in this area.[Methods] Four alpine vegetation types (alpine meadow
alpine shrub
temperate steppe
and temperate desert) were studied. The distribution characteristics of soil organic matter (SOM)
total nitrogen (TN)
total phosphorus (TP)
and SMC at different soil depths and four slope directions under the four vegetation types were analyzed through field investigation
laboratory experiments
and mathematical statistics
and their correlations with air temperature and annual cumulative rainfall were analyzed.[Results] ① SOM in the study area was 1.85~190.31 mg/g; TN was 0.07~7.99 mg/g; TP was 0.24~1.81 mg/g; and SMC was 0.79%~3.21%. ② The differences in SOM
TN
TP
and SMC content were mainly affected by differences in vegetation types. Soil moisture content of different vegetation types followed the order of alpine meadow > alpine shrub > temperate grassland > temperate desert. TN followed the order of alpine shrub > alpine meadow > temperate grassland > temperate desert. TP contents followed the order of temperate grassland > alpine meadow > alpine shrub > temperate desert. Regarding the four slope directions
TP content was the highest on the semi-shady slope and the lowest on the sunny slope. The contents of SOM
TN
and SMC were the highest on the semi-sunny slope. ③ SOM
TN
TP
and SMC were significantly positively correlated with annual cumulative rainfall (p<0.01). SOM and SMC were significantly negatively correlated with annual average temperature (p<0.01). TN was significantly negatively correlated with annual average temperature (p<0.05).[Conclusion] The implementation of soil and water conservation and ecological vegetation restoration measures in the Qilian Mountains can be considered for semi-sunny slope
alpine meadow areas. For alpine shrub and meadow areas
the beneficial cycle of ecosystem materials appropriate to local conditions should be promoted.
夏光辉, 郭青霞, 卢庆民, 等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分及生态化学计量特征[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(2):140-147.
王苗苗, 陈洪松, 付同刚, 等.典型喀斯特小流域不同植被类型间土壤养分的差异性及其空间预测方法[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6):1759-1766.
Jiao Shuying, Zhang Min, Wang Yamei, et al.Variation of soil nutrients and particle size under different vegetation types in the Yellow River Delta[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(3):148-153.
姜红梅, 李明治, 王亲, 等.祁连山东段不同植被下土壤养分状况研究[J].水土保持研究, 2011, 18(5):166-170.
李学斌, 吴秀玲, 陈林, 等.荒漠草原4种主要植物群落枯落物层水土保持功能[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):189-193.
姚喜喜, 宫旭胤, 白滨, 等.祁连山高寒牧区不同类型草地植被特征与土壤养分及其相关性研究[J].草地学报, 2018, 26(2):371-379.
张红, 吕家珑, 赵世伟, 等.不同植被覆盖下子午岭土壤养分状况研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2006, 24(2):66-69.
Fang Xuan, Xue Zhijing, Li Bicheng, et al.Soil organic carbon distribution in relation to land use and its storage in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena, 2012, 88(1):6-13.
黄雅茹, 马迎宾, 郝玉光, 等.乌兰布和东北部典型土地利用的土壤养分特征[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(1):123-129.
Ge Jiamin, Wang Sheng, Fan Jun, et al.Soil nutrients of different land-use types and topographic positions in the water-wind erosion crisscross region of China's Loess Plateau[J].Catena, 2020, 184:104243.
安文明, 梁海斌, 王聪, 等.黄土高原阴/阳坡向林草土壤水分随退耕年限的变化特征[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(18):6120-6127.
信忠保, 余新晓, 张满良, 等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用的土壤养分特征[J].干旱区研究, 2012, 29(3):379-384.
顾振宽, 杜国祯, 朱炜歆, 等.青藏高原东部不同草地类型土壤养分的分布规律[J].草业科学, 2012, 29(4):507-512.
Wang Yibo, Wu Qingbai, Tian Liming, et al.Correlation of alpine vegetation degradation and soil nutrient status of permafrost in the source regions of the Yangtze River, China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 67(4):1215-1223.
巩杰, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 等.黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):93-96.
罗红, 普布顿珠, 朱雪林, 等.西藏人工造林作业区土壤肥力评价[J].应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5):1507-1514.
车明轩, 吴强, 方浩, 等.海拔、坡向对川西高山灌丛草甸土壤氮、磷分布的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(5):1163-1169.
贾文雄, 陈京华.1982-2014年祁连山植被生长季NDVI变化及其对气候的响应[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2):264-268.
武正丽, 贾文雄, 赵珍, 等.2000-2012年祁连山植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的相关性[J].干旱区地理, 2015, 38(6):1241-1252.
邱丽莎, 张立峰, 何毅, 等.2000-2017年祁连山植被动态变化遥感监测[J].遥感信息, 2019, 34(4):97-107.
王涛, 高峰, 王宝, 等.祁连山生态保护与修复的现状问题与建议[J].冰川冻土, 2017, 39(2):229-234.
汪有奎, 贾文雄, 刘潮海, 等.祁连山北坡的生态环境变化[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(4):21-26.
贾文雄, 赵珍, 俎佳星, 等.祁连山不同植被类型的物候变化及其对气候的响应[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(23):7826-7840.
李璇, 杨帆, 李德成, 等.祁连山区土壤砂粒含量剖面分布模式及其影响因素[J].土壤学报, 2017, 54(4):854-863.
戴声佩, 张勃, 王强, 等.祁连山草地植被NDVI变化及其对气温降水的旬响应特征[J].资源科学, 2010, 32(9):1769-1776.
赵忠, 何毅, 李青, 等.肃南、肃北草地类型及草地植物物种多样性现状[J].草业学报, 2010, 19(5):227-238.
0
浏览量
641
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621