湖南科技大学 地球科学与空间信息工程学院,湖南,湘潭,411100
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
曹若兰, 莫宏伟. 韶山市土地利用变化对周围土地生态服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):307-314.
Cao Ruolan, Mo Hongwei. Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecological Service Value of Land Surrounding Shaoshan City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 307-314.
曹若兰, 莫宏伟. 韶山市土地利用变化对周围土地生态服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):307-314. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.041.
Cao Ruolan, Mo Hongwei. Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecological Service Value of Land Surrounding Shaoshan City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 307-314. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.041.
[目的] 分析湖南省韶山市土地利用变化及生态服务价值变化,探讨土地利用变化对周围土地生态服务价值的影响,为土地利用变化与生态服务价值的相关研究以及生态服务价值评估体系的确定提供科学参考。[方法] 利用1985和2020年的两期遥感影像通过遥感解译提取土地利用数据,基于生态服务的基本定义,综合考虑土地利用变化和土地生态服务价值的关系。[结果] ①韶山市土地利用的转换主要发生在林地、耕地和草地之间,林地的单一土地动态度最大,约为3%; ②1985—2020年韶山市生态服务价值逐年增加,由12.66亿元上升到22.01亿元,其中林地对生态服务价值的贡献率最大,约为70%; ③研究期内,韶山市土地利用变化对周围土地生态服务价值的遥相关增加值为4.67亿元。土地利用变化对周围土地生态服务价值的影响随距离增加而减小,直到达到某一临界距离。不同地类转换其临界距离也各不相同。其中土地利用类型转换为水体时其临界距离最大,约为100个斑块。[结论] 1985—2020年韶山市土地利用变化对周围土地的生态服务价值产生了较大影响。今后在土地规划时应综合考虑土地利用变化对周围土地的影响。以期更好地实现经济与环境的协调发展。
[Objective] The change of land use and ecological service value in Shaoshan City
Hunan Province was analyzed to discusse the impacts of land use change on the surrounding land ecological service value
in order to provide a scientific reference for the related research of land use change and ecological service value
and to determine an ecological service value evaluation system. [Methods] Using remote sensing images in 1985 and 2020
land use data were extracted by remote sensing interpretation. Based on the basic definition of ecosystem service
land use change and the relationship between land ecosystem service value were comprehensively considered. A related concept was put forward and a remote correlation model was built. The surrounding land ecosystem service value following land use change was discussed. [Results] ① Land use conversion mainly occurred between forest land
cropland
and grassland
and the land dynamic attitude of forest land was the largest (about 3%). ② The value of ecosystem services in Shaoshan City increased year by year from 1.266 billion yuan in 1985 to 2.201 billion yuan in 2020
and the contribution rate of forest land to the ecosystem services value was 70%. ③ During the study period
the remote correlation added value of land use change to the surrounding land ecosystem service value was 467 million yuan. The impact of land use change on the value of surrounding land ecosystem services decreased with increasing distance
until a critical distance was reached
and the critical distance varied with different land types. When land use type was converted to water body
the critical distance was the largest
about 100 patches (land type conversion area). [Conclusion] In the future
the impact of land use change on surrounding land should be comprehensively considered in land planning so as to formulate reasonable land use policy
optimize land use structure
and realize the coordinated development of economy and environment in Shaoshan City.
欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
龙精华,张卫,付艳华,等.鹤岗矿区生态系统服务价值[J].生态学报,2021,41(5):1728-1737.
张建,雷刚,漆良华,等.2003—2018年土地利用变化对丹江口市景观格局与生态服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1280-1290.
Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Applying value transfer method for eco-service valuation in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010,1(1):51-59.
马文鼎,赵永敢,王淑娟.乾安县盐碱地改良项目的生态效益评估[J].贵州农业科学,2021,49(6):128-133.
周小平,冯宇晴,罗维,等.两种生态系统服务价值评估方法比较研究:以四川省金堂县三星镇土地整治工程为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1799-1809.
黄傅强,王志远,刘慧,等.基于生态系统服务价值的城市增长边界划定研究:以衡阳市中心城区为例[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(9):1115-1125.
万雁华,周宏,柳丽杰,等.粤北生态特别保护区(韶关市范围)优势树种(组)生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].林业与环境科学,2020,36(6):96-102.
茹克亚·萨吾提,阿斯娅·曼力克,李虎,等.乌鲁木齐山地草地生态系统服务价值变化评估:基于遥感与GIS[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):522-539.
李英,王治良,罗金明,等.基于当量因子法的嫩江流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J].高师理科学刊,2020,40(2):56-62.
杨钦智,官冬杰,刘欣雨,等.重庆湿地公园生态系统服务社会价值评估:以秀湖湿地公园为例[J].重庆第二师范学院学报,2020,33(5):20-23,127.
陈兵飞,廖铁军,张莉坤.生态红线约束下万州区土地利用情景模拟及生态价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):349-357,364.
Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Lariqauderie A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs [J]. Proceed Ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013,110(S1):3665-3672.
魏慧,赵文武,张骁,等.基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价:以山东省德州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3830-3839.
房学宁,赵文武.生态系统服务研究进展:2013年第11届国际生态学大会(INTECOL Congress)会议述评[J].生态学报,2013,33(20):6736-6740.
黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1904-1920.
王莉,魏楚依,肖高磊,等.基于RS的杭州市生态系统服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].山西农业科学报,2015,43(7):902-907.
王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1998,17(1):81-87.
Costanza R, De Groot, Farber S. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
黄傅强,许德莉,齐增湘,等.基于RS和GIS的中心城区土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值分析:以衡阳市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(19):43-47,72.
0
浏览量
813
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621