广西师范大学 环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张军民, 李昱桥, 荣城. 漓江流域2000—2020年土地利用和覆被变化时空分异特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):250-258.
Zhang Junmin, Li Yuqiao, Rong Cheng. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Lijiang River Basin During 2000—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 250-258.
张军民, 李昱桥, 荣城. 漓江流域2000—2020年土地利用和覆被变化时空分异特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):250-258. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.034.
Zhang Junmin, Li Yuqiao, Rong Cheng. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Lijiang River Basin During 2000—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 250-258. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.034.
[目的] 分析2000—2020年漓江流域土地利用和覆被变化时空分异规律,为协同人类活动及生态安全提供空间治理依据。[方法] 基于遥感信息识别和GIS空间分析平台,应用扩张强度、转移矩阵及时空统计、空间自组织分析等方法,从多维时空尺度研究流域土地利用及景观结构变化规律。[结果] ①漓江流域以林地、耕地为主体景观,合占景观面积的比例超过90%,2000—2020年其面积变率小于0.37%,扩张强度小于年均3.59%,表明流域具有高质量的景观生态资源和建成国际旅游中心的生态资本,景观结构稳定,水生态良好; ②建设用地增长最快,扩张显著,2000—2020年其面积增长了163.41%,其中临桂新区年均扩张37.79%,城镇化是流域景观类型及结构变化的主要驱动; ③流域景观类型多样性丰富、分布均衡,多样性和均匀度指数在城镇及旅游中心形成高值中心,山地区则为低值连片;连通性或延展性较好,山区为高值中心,城镇为低值中心,人类活动对草地形态及城镇周边(中值区)的扰动较显著。[结论] 流域景观指数结构受相似的发生环境和分异因素影响而具有空间集聚性分布特征,城镇扩张及旅游活动是漓江流域景观格局分异的主要驱动,区域发展较适合集中城镇化与分散旅游业模式。
[Objective] The temporal and spatial differentiation of land use and land cover change of the Lijiang River basin during 2000—2020 was analyzed in order to provide a basis for spatial governance for coordinated human activities and ecological security. [Methods] Based on remote sensing information identification and GIS spatial analysis platform
expansion intensity
transition matrix and time-space statistics and spatial self-organization methods were used to study the changing laws of land use and landscape structure. [Results] ① The main landscape of the Lijiang River basin was forest land and cultivated land
accounting for more than 90% of the landscape area. During 2000—2020
the area change rate was less than 0.37%
and the expansion intensity was less than 3.59% per year
indicating that the watershed had high-quality landscape ecology resources and ecological capital to build an international tourism center. Besides
its landscape structure was stable
and water ecology was good. ② Construction land had the fastest growth and significant expansion. Its area increased by 163.41% during 2000—2020
of which the average annual expansion of Lingui New District was 37.79%. Urbanization was the main driving force for landscape type and structural changes
and the water ecosystem was well maintained. ③ The watershed landscape types were rich in diversity
the landscape distribution was balanced. The diversity and evenness index formed a high-value center in cities and towns and tourism centers
while in mountainous areas
it was a low-value continuous area. The connectivity was good
the mountainous area was the high value center and the town was the low value center. Human activities had a significant disturbance to the grassland shape and the surrounding area of the town (median area). [Conclusion] The watershed landscape index structure is affected by similar occurrence environment and differentiation factors and that has spatial agglomeration distribution characteristics. Urban expansion and tourism activities are the main drivers of the differentiation of the landscape pattern of the Lijiang River basin. Regional development is more suitable for centralized urbanization and decentralized tourism.
刘纪远,张增祥,张树文,等.中国土地利用变化遥感研究的回顾与展望:基于陈述彭学术思想的引领[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(4):680-687.
曾辉,陈利顶,丁圣彦.景观生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2017.
刘燚序,王仰麟,彭建,等.基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价[J].地理学报,2015,70(7):1052-1067.
陈峰,李红波,张安录.基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):432-445.
殷楠,王帅,刘歘序.生态系统服务价值评估:研究进展与展望[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(1):233-244.
张楚宜,胡远满,刘歘,等.景观生态学三维格局研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(12):4353-4360.
王国玉,白伟岗,熊筱,等.京津冀城市群生态空间受损识别研究[J].城市规划,2021,45(8):11-22.
傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1052-1059.
Yang Jun, Guan Yingying, Xia Jianhong, et al. Spatiotemporal variation characteristic of green space ecosystem service value at urban fringes: A case study on Ganjingzi District in Dalian, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,639:1453-1461.
Shi Xuemin, Qin Mingzhou. Research on the optimization of regional green infrastructure network [J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(12):4649.
杨志广,蒋志云,郭程轩,等.基于形态空间格局分析和最小累积阻力模型的广州市生态网络构建[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3367-3376.
曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.
李凯,候鹰,Hans S P,等.景观规划导向的绿色基础设施研究进展:基于“格局—过程—服务—可持续性”研究范式[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(2):435-448.
薛嵩嵩,高凡,何兵,等.1989—2017年乌伦古河流域景观格局及驱动力分析[J].生态科学,2021,40(3):33-41.
唐常春,李亚平.多中心城市群土地利用/覆被变化地学信息图谱研究:以长株潭城市群为例[J].地理研究,2020,39(11):2626-2641.
张秋梦,杨方社,李飞.改革开放以来中国粮食生产重构[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(6):1426-1438.
王菊,赵俊三,林伊琳,等.基于“三生空间”的昆明市国土空间结构演变特征分析[J].城市勘测,2021(2):29-34.
焦庚英,杨效忠,黄志强,等.县域“三生空间”格局与功能演变特征及可能影响因素分析:以江西婺源县为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1252-1267.
田甜,牟凤云,王俊秀,等.重庆市主城区土地利用变化对地表径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):128-135.
张镱锂,刘林山,王兆锋,等.青藏高原土地利用/覆被变化的时空特征[J].科学通报,2019,64(27):2865-2875.
张彪,徐洁,谢高地,等.2000—2010年北京城市绿色空间格局动态分析[J].生态科学,2016,35(6):24-33.
谢高地,张彪,鲁春霞,等.北京城市扩张的资源环境效应[J].资源科学,2015,37(6):1108-1114.
郑博福,黄琼瑶,陶林,等.赣南地区景观格局变化及对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):1-10.
林增学.1985—2014年漓江流域景观格局动态变化研究[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(3):466-471.
向芸芸,蒙吉军.漓江流域旅游开发景观格局干扰的时空分异[J].山地学报,2014,32(1):11-20.
何毅,唐湘玲,代俊峰.漓江流域生态系统服务价值最大化的土地利用结构优化[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):1-9.
陆丹丹,钟永德,杨永德,等.漓江上游土地利用/覆盖变化及驱动力研究[J].生态经济,2015,31(9):128-132.
王劲峰,廖一兰,刘鑫.空间数据分析教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
0
浏览量
749
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621