基于熵值法的南宁市膨胀土护坡植被根系特征指标评价

许英姿; 朱乔生; 黄效

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.026

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于熵值法的南宁市膨胀土护坡植被根系特征指标评价

试验研究

- 基于熵值法的南宁市膨胀土护坡植被根系特征指标评价
- Root Evaluation of Slope Protection Vegetation Characteristic Indexes on Expansive Soil in Nanning City Based on Entropy Value Method
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第2期页码：189-194
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广西大学土木建筑工程学院,广西,南宁,530004
  2. 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,广西,南宁,530004
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  广西国土资源厅重大科研课题“典型滑坡隐患点监测预警技术研究”(GXZC2018-G3-19302-JGYZ)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.026
  中图分类号： Q948.15;S157.1;TU443
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
许英姿, 朱乔生, 黄效. 基于熵值法的南宁市膨胀土护坡植被根系特征指标评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):189-194.

Xu Yingzi, Zhu Qiaosheng, Huang Xiao. Root Evaluation of Slope Protection Vegetation Characteristic Indexes on Expansive Soil in Nanning City Based on Entropy Value Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 189-194.
许英姿, 朱乔生, 黄效. 基于熵值法的南宁市膨胀土护坡植被根系特征指标评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):189-194. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.026.

Xu Yingzi, Zhu Qiaosheng, Huang Xiao. Root Evaluation of Slope Protection Vegetation Characteristic Indexes on Expansive Soil in Nanning City Based on Entropy Value Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 189-194. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.026.

摘要

[目的] 评价植物对膨胀土边坡的防护作用，为膨胀土边坡防护植被的选取提供科学参考。[方法] 在广西壮族自治区南宁市膨胀土地区草本植被中，选取8种常见植物并提取其整体根系特征及分层根系特征，统计分层根系特征的根长量、根表面积、根直径、根体积4个指标值。采用熵值法对所提取的4个根系特征指标进行赋权量化，并基于不同指标的权重综合比较评价植被根系护坡效果的优劣。[结果] 植被的直径在0.25~0.55 mm，随深度加深变化不大。5 cm的浅层土中的根长量、根表面积、根体积占整个深度范围的50%～85.4%，且随着土层深度的增加而急剧递减。鬼针草的根长量、根表面积、根体积在整个深度范围中均有明显优势。根长量、根表面积、根直径、根体积的权重系数分别为0.310 0，0.243 2，0.165 4，0.281 5。综合评价值最高的是鬼针草，为0.916，其次为高羊茅，为0.761。最低的是黑麦草，为0.110。[结论] 基于不同指标权重综合分析结果，鬼针草的评级最高，最适合作为南宁膨胀土地区的护坡植被。

Abstract

[Objective] The protective effect of plants on the slope of an expansive soil was evaluated in order to provide a scientific reference for the selection of protective vegetation on the slope of expansive soils. [Methods] Eight common plants were selected from the herbaceous vegetation in the expansive soil area in Nanning City

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

and their overall root characteristics and stratified root characteristics were extracted. The four indexes of stratified root characteristics (root length

root surface area

root diameter

and root volume) were calculated. The entropy method was used to assign weights to the four characteristic indexes of the root system

and the advantages and disadvantages of the slope protection effect of vegetation root systems were evaluated comprehensively based on the weight of different characteristic indexes. [Results] The results showed that the root diameter of vegetation ranged from 0.25 mm to 0.55 mm

and there was little change with depth. Root length

root surface area

and root volume in shallow soil of 0—5 cm layer) accounted for 50.0%~85.4% of the entire depth range

and decreased sharply with increasing soil depth. Root length

root surface area

and root volume had obvious advantages over the entire depth range. The weight coefficients of root length

root surface area

root diameter

and root volume were 0.310 0

0.243 2

0.165 4

and 0.281 5

respectively. The comprehensive evaluation value was the highest for Bidens pilosa. (0.916)

followed by Festuca elata (0.761). The lowest value was observed for Lolium perenne (0.110). [Conclusion] Based on the comprehensive analysis of different index weights

the rating of Bidens pilosa was the highest

and therefore

this species is the most suitable for slope protection in the expansive soil area of Nanning City.

关键词

Keywords

references

骆赵刚,汪时机,杨振北.膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J].岩土力学,2020,41(7):2313-2323.

鲁志方,杨晓华,晏长根.土工格室植被护坡防膨胀土边坡开裂机理研究[J].公路,2016,61(4):23-28.

殷宗泽,袁俊平,韦杰,等.论裂隙对膨胀土边坡稳定的影响[J].岩土工程学报,2012,34(12):2155-2161.

Wang Xia, Hong Miaomiao, Huang Zheng, et al. Biomechanical properties of plant root systems and their ability to stabilize slopes in geohazard-prone regions [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019,189:148-157.

李雄威,孔令伟,郭爱国.植被作用下膨胀土渗透和力学特性及堑坡防护机制[J].岩土力学,2013,34(1):85-91.

Ng Charles W W, Zhang Qi, Ni Junjun, et al. A new three-dimensional theoretical model for analysing the stability of vegetated slopes with different root architectures and planting patterns [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021,130:103912.

邓鹏,王桂尧,梅智鹏,等.根系分布对膨胀土干缩开裂影响试验研究[J].交通科学与工程,2021,37(1):19-25.

符金良.香根草根系加筋膨胀土力学特性试验研究[D].湖南长沙：长沙理工大学,2018.

Chau N L, Chu L M. Fern cover and the importance of plant traits in reducing erosion on steep soil slopes [J]. Catena, 2017,151:98-106.

Osman N, Barakbah S S. Parameters to predict slope stability： Soil water and root profiles [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006,28(1):90-95.

Ni J J, Leung A K, Ng C W W, et al. Modelling hydro-mechanical reinforcements of plants to slope stability [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018,95:99-109.

张荣,董洪君,周润惠,等.四川夹金山灌丛群落根系特征对土壤抗冲性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(11):3558-3566.

李彦,谷会岩,陈月明.植被细根对典型黑土土壤抗蚀性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2020,48(7):81-85.

吴宏伟.大气—植被—土体相互作用:理论与机理[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(1):1-47.

Zhang Chaobo, Li Dongrong, Jiang Jing, et al. Evaluating the potential slope plants using new method for soil reinforcement program [J]. Catena, 2019,180:346-354.

Li Yunpeng, Wang Yunqi, Ma Chao, et al. Influence of the spatial layout of plant roots on slope stability [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,91:477-486.

Zhang C, Jiang J, Ma J, et al. Evaluating soil reinforcement by plant roots using artificial neural networks [J]. Soil Use Manage, 2015,31(3):408-416.

许松宜.南宁膨胀土边坡植被加强系统的试验研究[D].广西南宁：广西大学,2014.

陈泽云.熵值法的船舶电子商务物流供应链评价[J].舰船科学技术,2020,42(24):199-201.

伏坤,刘勇,王珣,等.基于熵值分析法的铁路高陡土质边坡安全性评价[J].铁道标准设计,2020,64(6):5-8.

金晓,陈丽华.晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):120-126.

裴玮.基于熵值法的城市高质量发展综合评价[J].统计与决策,2020,36(16):119-122.

杜国梁,高金川,李瑞冬.基于模糊综合评价法和熵值法的泥石流危险度评价[J].安全与环境工程,2013,20(5):15-17,32.

沈世伟,许君臣,代树林,等.基于熵值赋权法的节理岩体隧道爆破质量可拓学评价[J].土木工程学报,2013,46(12):118-126.

王伟,刘丹娜,彭第.基于熵值法的砂卵石地层深基坑开挖安全可拓评价[J].西南交通大学学报,2021,56(4):785-791,838.

浏览量

568

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

冻融循环对不同比例风化砂改良膨胀土膨胀力的影响

膨胀土地区土坎梯地的规格化研究

西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例

数字经济对长江经济带农业生态产品价值转化效率的影响

青海省2009—2023年农业面源污染结构及变化特征