安徽理工大学 地球与环境学院,安徽,淮南,232001
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
刘丽红, 蒋鹏, 温永帅. 桥梁建设对蓄滞洪区洪水演进影响的模拟与分析——以濛洼蓄洪区特大桥工程为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):150-156.
Liu Lihong, Jiang Peng, Wen Yongshuai. Simulation and Analysis on Impact of Bridge Construction on Flood Evolution in a Flood Storage and Detention Area —Taking Mengwa Flood Storage Area Bridge Project as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 150-156.
刘丽红, 蒋鹏, 温永帅. 桥梁建设对蓄滞洪区洪水演进影响的模拟与分析——以濛洼蓄洪区特大桥工程为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):150-156. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.021.
Liu Lihong, Jiang Peng, Wen Yongshuai. Simulation and Analysis on Impact of Bridge Construction on Flood Evolution in a Flood Storage and Detention Area —Taking Mengwa Flood Storage Area Bridge Project as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 150-156. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.021.
[目的] 分析涉水建筑物修建前后洪水演进过程的影响,为真实高效计算桥梁工程对蓄滞洪区洪水演进过程以及对蓄洪区防洪工作的有效开展提供科学支持。[方法] 选取安徽省阜阳市濛洼蓄洪区为研究区,利用区域地形、水文数据、桥梁工程设计等最新资料,采用MIKE 21的非结构化水动力学模型,将进洪退洪过程作为整体对濛洼蓄洪区洪水演进过程进行实时模拟,分析桥梁工程建设对蓄滞洪区洪水演进分洪时间、流速分布、水位变化等特性的影响。[结果] 桥梁工程修建后,桥位附近分洪历时比工程修建前最大滞后45 s,主流区流速分布范围为0.4~0.6 m/s,局部流速变化率最大7.409%,桥墩附近水位最大抬高值为0.006 m,水位最大变化率为-0.22‰。[结论] 桥梁的建设延缓了蓄洪区行洪时间,抬高了桥墩附近水位,改变了工程附近流速分布,但对蓄洪区整体的影响较小,基本不影响濛洼蓄洪区的正常运行。
[Objective] The influence of water-related structures on the flood routing process before and after structure construction was analyzed to provide scientific supports for the real and efficient calculation of bridge engineering in flood storage and detention areas
and for the effective development of flood control in flood storage areas. [Methods] The Mengwa flood storage area in Fuyang City
Anhui Province was selected as the study area. Based on the latest data of regional topography
hydrological data
and bridge engineering design
the unstructured hydrodynamic model of MIKE 21 was used to simulate the flood evolution process of the Mengwa flood storage area in real time. The influence of bridge construction on flood evolution time
velocity distribution
and water level change in the flood storage and detention area was analyzed. [Results] After the construction of the bridge project
the flood-splitting time near the bridge position was 45 s behind the maximum lag before the construction of the project; the flow rate distribution range of the mainstream area was 0.4 to 0.6 m/s; the local velocity change rate was 7.409%; the maximum elevation value of the water level near the bridge was 0.006 m; and the maximum change rate of the water level was -0.22‰. [Conclusion] Bridge construction delayed the flooding time in the flood storage area
raised the water level near the pier
and changed the distribution of the flow rate near the project. However
the overall impact on the flood storage area was small
and basically did not affect the normal operation of the flood storage area.
任伟义.温州市洪涝台灾害应急管理能力提升研究[D].上海:华东政法大学,2015.
薛文宇.城市暴雨积水及街道洪水模拟模型研究[D].天津:天津大学,2016.
刘恒洋.基于DEM的洪湖分蓄洪区东块洪水淹没模拟研究[D].湖北 武汉:华中科技大学.
国家防汛抗旱总指挥部.中国水旱灾害公报(2019)[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2021.
董柏良,夏军强,陈瑾晗.典型街区洪水演进的概化水槽试验研究[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(7):99-108.
G Mccarthy. Unit Hydrograph and Flood Routing[C]//US: Conference of North Atlantic Division, 1939.
苏飞,王士武,陈雪,等.平原河网一维水流计算模型在洪水期和枯水期的应用[J].中国农村水利水电,2008(1):34-36,39.
李大鸣,林毅,周志华.蓄滞洪区洪水演进一、二维数值仿真及其在洼淀联合调度中的应用[J].中国工程科学,2010,12(3):82-89.
许婷.丹麦MIKE21模型概述及应用实例[J].水利科技与经济,2010,16(8):867-869.
万长宇.河道疏浚断面设计探讨:以濛马河上段为例[J].工程与建设,2019,33(3)373-375.
张红萍,胡昌伟,刘舒.濛洼蓄滞洪区洪水淹没数值模拟[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2005,3(4):52-57.
张鹏,季益柱.桥梁工程跨越蓄洪区对防洪的影响评价[J].治淮,2018(4):18-21.
许婷. MIKE21 HD计算原理及应用实例[J].港工技术,2010,47(5):1-5.
班美娜,武永新.基于MIKE21 FM的南渡江河口段行洪能力分析[J].南水北调与水利科技,2018,16(2):151-157.
孙光春.取排水口附近流场模拟及对通航的影响研究[D].辽宁 大连:大连海事大学,2017.
0
浏览量
745
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621