上海市搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征

梁晶; 伍海兵; 张浪

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

上海市搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征

试验研究

- 上海市搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征
- Distribution Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in Urban Relocation Sites of Shanghai City
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第2期页码：59-66
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 上海市园林科学规划研究院,上海,200232
  2. 上海城市困难立地绿化工程技术研究中心,上海,200232
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  上海市绿化和市容管理局科技攻关项目“湿垃圾处置固态残余物资源化利用途径研究”(G200202);上海市绿化和市容管理局科技攻关项目“城市污染土壤生态修复关键技术研发与集成应用”(G190202)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.009
  中图分类号： S152.5;S152.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梁晶, 伍海兵, 张浪. 上海市搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):59-66.

Liang Jing, Wu Haibing, Zhang Lang. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in Urban Relocation Sites of Shanghai City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 59-66.
梁晶, 伍海兵, 张浪. 上海市搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(2):59-66. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.009.

Liang Jing, Wu Haibing, Zhang Lang. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in Urban Relocation Sites of Shanghai City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 59-66. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.009.

摘要

[目的] 分析城市典型搬迁地土壤团聚体的分布特征，为搬迁地土壤绿化种植提供技术支撑。[方法] 以上海市城中村和工企业两种典型搬迁地土壤为研究对象，采集27个典型搬迁地土样，采用干筛和湿筛法分别测定搬迁地土壤非水稳性团聚体和水稳性团聚体，分析了上海搬迁地土壤团聚体分布特性，通过单因素方差法分析了不同搬迁地土壤团聚体的差异性，并对土壤团聚体与土壤基本理化性质进行了相关性分析。[结果] 上海搬迁地土壤非水稳性团聚体以粒径≥2.0 mm的大团聚体为主，所占比例达64.9%；土壤水稳性团聚体以粒径＜0.106 mm的微团聚体为主，所占比例高达73.4%；土壤团聚体破坏率大，为79.8%。城中村搬迁地土壤非水稳性团粒结构体(粒径≥0.25 mm)显著高于工企业搬迁地(p＜0.05)，但水稳性团粒结构体差异不明显；工企业搬迁地土壤团聚体破坏率显著高于城中村搬迁地(p＜0.05)。土壤团聚体破坏率与土壤容重呈极显著正相关性，与土壤田间持水量、总孔隙度及有机质则呈极显著负相关性(p＜0.01)。[结论] 上海市搬迁地土壤团粒结构体差，团聚体破坏率高，但城中村土壤团粒结构体及稳定性优于工企业搬迁地。搬迁地土壤团聚体破坏率主要受土壤容重、田间持水量、总孔隙度及有机质等因子影响。

Abstract

[Objective] The distribution characteristics of soil aggregates in typical relocation sites of Shanghai City were analyzed in order to provide technical support for soil afforestation in relocation sites. [Methods] Taking the soils of two typical relocation sites at urban villages and industrial enterprises as the research objects

27 soil samples of typical relocation sites were collected

and dry-sieving and wet-sieving methods were used to determine soil non-water stable aggregates and water stable aggregates

respectively. And the distribution characteristics of soil aggregates in relocation sites were analyzed through single-factor analysis of variance. The differences of soil aggregates in different relocation sites were analyzed

and the correlations between soil aggregates and the basic physical and chemical properties of soil were analyzed. [Results] The soil non-water stable aggregates were mainly large aggregates with particle size ≥2.0 mm

accounting for 64.9%. Soil water-stable aggregates were dominated by micro-aggregates with particle size ＜ 0.106 mm

accounting for 73.4%. The destruction rate of soil aggregates was 79.8%. Soil non-water stable aggregates (particle size ≥0.25 mm) in the relocation site of urban village were significantly higher than that in the relocation site of industrial enterprises (p＜0.05)

but there was no significant difference in water-stable aggregates. The soil aggregate damage rate of industrial enterprises was significantly higher than that in the relocation sites of urban villages (p＜0.05). The soil aggregate damage rate was significantly positively correlated with soil bulk density

while significantly negatively correlated with soil field capacity

total porosity and organic matter (p＜0.01). [Conclusion] The overall soil aggregate structure in the relocation site of the Shanghai City is poor

and the soil aggregate damage rate is high

but the soil aggregate structure and stability of the urban village is better than that of the industrial enterprises. The soil aggregate damage rate is mainly affected by soil bulk density

field capacity

total porosity and organic matter.

关键词

Keywords

references

王雁.我国城市绿化理念探索的回顾与发展趋势[J].浙江林学院学报,2003, 20(3):91-96.

上海市绿化和市容管理局,上海市规划和自然资源局.上海市生态空间专项规划(2018-2035)(公示)[EB/OL].http://lhsr.sh.gov.cn/gggs/20200413/0039-01241CC9-626B-41B7-B769-7D87B98C03B0.html,2020-04.

赵沁娜.城市土地置换过程中土壤污染研究进展评述[J].土壤,2009,41(3):350-355.

张浪.城市困难立地概念及其分类辨析[J].上海建设科技,2020(3):107-109.

张浪,韩继刚,伍海兵,等.关于园林绿化快速成景配生土的思考[J].土壤通报,2017,48(5):1264-1267.

李晓策,郑思俊,张浪.上海城市困难立地识别及分布特征[J].园林,2021,38(2):7-12.

Yin Yan, Liang Chenghua, Pei Zhongjian.. Effect of greenhouse soil management on soil aggregation and organic matter in Northeast China [J]. Catena, 2015,133:412-419.

Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between(micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.

Lützow M V, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: Mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions review [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2006,57(4):426-445.

Horn R, Smucker A. Structure formation and its consequences for gas and water transport in unsaturated arable and forest soils [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2005,82(1):5-14.

王浩田,姜超强,蒋瑀霁,等.皖南沿江平原不同年限烟—稻轮作土壤团聚体组成与烤烟产质量的关系[J].土壤,2020,52(5):1057-1067.

白娜玲,吕卫光,李双喜,等.施肥方式对稻麦轮作土壤团聚体分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):88-93,100.

喻国军,谢晓尧.喀斯特地区造林对土壤团聚体稳定性及微生物碳代谢活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):21-27,36.

张宏伟,魏忠义,王秋兵.沈阳城市土壤全钾和碱解氮的空间变异性[J].应用生态学报,2008, 19(7):1517-1521.

罗帅,马新月,王东,等.重庆市场地土壤污染特征分析及行业来源识别[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(4):810-818.

黄财德,甄华杨,岳士忠,等.养殖场搬迁后场地土壤污染评价及农用建议[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(S1):222-226.

李书鹏,焦文涛,李鸿炫,等.燃气热脱附技术修复有机污染场地研究与应用进展[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(9):2037-2048.

张文婷,王子邦.不同种植年限城市绿化土壤团聚体及有机碳分布特征[J].天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,41(4):61-67.

Jim Y. Physical and chemical properties of Hong Kong roadside soil in relation to urban tree growth [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 1998,2:171-181.

卢瑛,龚子同,张甘霖,等.城市土壤的特性及其管理[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(2):206-209.

张万儒.森林土壤分析方法[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

白怡婧,刘彦伶,李渝,等.长期不同轮作模式对黄壤团聚体组成及有机碳的影响[J].土壤,2021,53(1):161-167.

方海兰,陈玲,黄懿珍,等.上海新建绿地的土壤质量现状和对策[J].林业科学,2007,43(S1):89-94.

徐香茹,汪景宽.土壤团聚体与有机碳稳定机制的研究进展[J].土壤通报,2017,48(6):1523-1529.

刘文利,吴景贵,傅民杰,等.种植年限对果园土壤团聚体分布与稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):129-135.

Tang Fukai, Cui Ming, Lu Qi, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on the aggregate stability and distribution of aggregate-associated organic carbon in a typical karst gorge region [J]. Solid Earth, 2016,7(3):2213-2242.

Zhang Bin, Horn R. Mechanisms of aggregate stabilization in Ultisols from subtropical China [J]. Geoderma, 2001,99(1):123-145.

An Shaoshan, Huang Yimei, Zheng Fenli. Evaluation of soil microbial indices along a revegetation chronosequence in grassland soils on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009,41(3):286-292.

张会慧,王世标,王均睿,等.三江平原湿地不同利用方式对土壤理化性质及团聚体组成的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(6):1679-1687.

章明奎,何振立,陈国潮,等.利用方式对红壤水稳定性团聚体形成的影响[J].土壤学报,1997,34(4):359-366.

伍海兵.上海中心城区典型绿地土壤物理性质特征研究[J].土壤,2018,50(1):155-161.

李强,李志伟,王全,等.云南陆良植烟土壤粒径分布及其分形维数空间变异研究[J].山地学报,2017,35(1):23-31.

蒋腊梅,白桂芬,吕光辉,等.不同管理模式对干旱区草原土壤团聚体稳定性及其理化性质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(4):15-21,39.

徐香茹,汪景宽.土壤团聚体与有机碳稳定机制的研究进展[J].土壤通报,2017,48(6):1523-1529.

庄正,张芸,张颖,等.不同发育阶段杉木人工林土壤团聚体分布特征及其稳定性研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):183-188.

侯传庆.上海土壤[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1992.

林立文,邓羽松,王金悦,等.南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(11):3647-3656.

安嫄嫄,马琨,王明国,等.玉米秸秆还田对土壤团聚体组成及其碳氮分布的影响[J].西北农业学报,2020,29(5):766-775.

谢均强.紫色土坡地团聚体稳定性特征及对侵蚀过程的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2009.

杨振奇,郭建英,秦富仓,等.裸露砒砂岩区不同植被类型土壤团聚体稳定性与抗蚀性能[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):8-14.

方薇.植被恢复对滇东喀斯特坡地土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[D].云南昆明：云南师范大学,2021.

王冰,周扬,张秋良.兴安落叶松林龄对土壤团聚体分布及其有机碳含量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(6):1618-1628.

Tisdall J M, Oades J M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils [J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1982,33(2):141-163.

王库.植物根系对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J].生态环境学报,2001,10(3):250-252.

邢菊香,郭建英,赵杏花,等.黄土丘陵区退耕还林后土壤物理性质恢复特征的研究:以陕西省吴起县为例[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(1):41-46.

胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等.典型岩溶山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):61-67.

刘金福,洪伟,吴承祯.中亚热带几种珍贵树种林分土壤团粒结构的分维特征[J].生态学报,2002, 22(2):197-205.

梁士楚,王伯荪.广西英罗港红树林区木榄群落土壤粒径分布的分形特征[J].热带海洋学报,2003, 22(1):17-22.

尚应妮,胡斐南,赵世伟,等.不同胶结物质对黄绵土团聚体形成的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):204-208,239.

Brady N, Weil R.土壤学与生活[M].李保国,徐建明,译.北京:科学出版社,2019.

Papadopoulos A, Bird N R A, Whitmore A P, et al. Investigating the effects of organic and conventional management on soil aggregate stability using X-ray computed tomography [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2009,60(3):360-368.

浏览量

745

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征

向海自然保护区湿地地表水氟化物分布特征及相关性分析

增温对内蒙古大青山油松人工林土壤团聚体及有机碳分布的影响

宁东煤电基地水土资源特征及其变化

川中丘陵区人工林土壤结构性及对土壤侵蚀的影响