湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,武汉,430068
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
江维薇, 朱颂, 肖衡林. 干旱年澜沧江小湾水库典型消落带植被制图及其空间分布分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):240-249.
Jiang Weiwei, Zhu Song, Xiao Henglin. Vegetation Mapping and Analysis of Its Spatial Distribution in Typical Water Level Fluctuating Zone of Xiaowan Reservoir on Lantsang River in Drought Year[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 240-249.
江维薇, 朱颂, 肖衡林. 干旱年澜沧江小湾水库典型消落带植被制图及其空间分布分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):240-249. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.032.
Jiang Weiwei, Zhu Song, Xiao Henglin. Vegetation Mapping and Analysis of Its Spatial Distribution in Typical Water Level Fluctuating Zone of Xiaowan Reservoir on Lantsang River in Drought Year[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 240-249. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.032.
[目的] 调查研究干旱年澜沧江小湾库区消落带植被自然恢复现状,为消落带植被恢复和维护等相关研究提供本底资料和参考。[方法] 以2019年消落带典型区域固定样地调查为依托,综合运用无人机遥感、GNSS定位和GIS空间分析,于2020年7月进行干旱年复位调查,绘制研究区消落带植被分布图,定量刻画干旱年研究区消落带植被自然恢复的物种组成、面积、覆盖率、沿地形梯度分布特征,并与2019年非干旱年进行对比分析。[结果] 研究区消落带统计植物共14种,为一年生或多年生草本植物,其中狗牙根、习见蓼、柳叶菜、藿香蓟为优势物种,分别占植被总面积的85.62%,4.22%,3.72%,3.12%。狗牙根在消落带高,中,低段比例分别为50.21%,9.94%,39.85%;柳叶菜有95.53%分布于高段;藿香蓟有54.48%分布于中段;87.22%的习见蓼分布于中段和低段。绝大多数植物偏好生长于25°以下缓坡消落带,而柳叶菜在坡度60°以下均覆盖良好。消落带植被受到地形因子的影响中:最近邻水体距离>高程>坡度>坡向。旱情导致植被年度退化59.75%,集中体现在消落带中下部,习见蓼大量枯萎退化。[结论] 消落带上半部相对于下半部植被恢复更稳定,优势物种的稳定性明显优于非优势物种,其中狗牙根和习见蓼耐淹性较好,而狗牙根相对于习见蓼表现出了更强的耐旱性和恢复稳定性;干旱胁迫和淹水胁迫对消落带植被的空间分布有显著影响,并且,在干旱年,前者的影响略大于后者。
[Objective] The natural restoration of vegetation in the water level fluctuating zone (WLFZ) of the Xiaowan Reservoir on Lantsang River during a drought year were investigated to provide background information and a reference for studies related to the restoration and maintenance of vegetation in the area. [Methods] Based on a fixed sample site survey in a typical area of WLFZ in 2019
a drought year reset survey was conducted in July 2020 using a combination of unmaned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing
GNSS positioning
and GIS spatial analysis to map the distribution of vegetation in WLFZ in the study area; quantitatively portray the species composition
area
cover
and distribution characteristics along a topographic gradient of vegetation in WLFZ in the drought year; and conduct a comparative analysis with the non-drought year of 2019. [Results] A total of 14 species of plants were counted
all of which were annual or perennial herbs. Cynodon dactylon
Polygonum plebeium
Epilobium hirsutum
and Ageratum conyzoides were the dominant species
accounting for 85.62%
4.22%
3.72%
and 3.12% of the total vegetation area
respectively. The proportions of C. dactylon in WLFZ were 50.21%
9.94%
and 39.85% in sections H
M
and L (high
medium
and low)
respectively; 95.53% of E. hirsutum was distributed in section H; 54.48% of A. conyzoides was distributed in section M; and 87.22% of P. plebeium was distributed in sections M and L. Most plants preferred to grow on gentle slopes below 25° in WLFZ
while E. hirsutum covered well on slopes less than 60°. Vegetation in WLFZ was influenced by topographic factors: distance to the nearest neighboring water body > elevation > slope > aspect. Drought resulted in an annual degradation of 59.75% of the vegetation
concentrated in the middle and lower parts of WLFZ
where a large amount of P. plebeium withered. [Conclusion] Vegetation recovery was more stable in the upper half of the zone than in the lower half
and the dominant species were significantly more stable than the non-dominant species
with C. dactylon and P. plebeium being more tolerant of flooding
while C. dactylon showed greater drought tolerance and recovery stability than P. plebeium. Drought stress and inundation stress had significant effects on the spatial distribution of vegetation in WLFZ. In drought years
drought stress had a slightly greater effect than inundation stress.
梁斯琦,陆颖,杨福平,等.澜沧江小湾水电站坝前水温垂向分布特征[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(6):156-162.
王仁坤.我国特高拱坝的建设成就与技术发展综述[J].水利水电科技进展,2015,35(5):13-19.
谢洪林,喻建清.小湾水电站分期蓄水实践与拱坝工作性态跟踪评价[J].云南水力发电,2020,36(2):171-175.
聂兵兵,张鹏,廖贵能.小湾水电站下游河道冲淤及尾水水位流量关系研究[J].云南水力发电,2019,35(1):33-37.
陈维东,尹云坤,朱庭兴.小湾水电站水库库岸管理探讨[J].水力发电,2015,41(10):12-14.
郭燕,杨邵,沈雅飞,等.三峡库区消落带现存草本植物组成与生态位[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3559-3568.
孔维苇,袁兴中,卢虹宇,等.三峡库区澎溪河消落带典型草本植物养分及生态化学计量特征[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(5):73-82.
钟荣华,成旭鹏,黄江成,等.小湾水库消落带空间分布特征[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(6):1104-1110.
徐雪婷.小湾库区消落带氮形态分布特征及其交换通量研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2020.
Jiang Weiwei, Liu Lun, Xiao Henglin, et al. Composition and distribution of vegetation in the water level fluctuating zone of the Lantsang cascade reservoir system using UAV multispectral imagery[J]. PLoS One, 2021,16(3):e0247682.
胡波,张平仓,任红玉,等. 三峡库区消落带植被生态学特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2010,27(11):81-85.
由永飞,杨春华,雷波,等.水位调节对三峡水库消落带植被群落特征的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(6):1103-1109.
孔维静,夏会娟,张远,等.辽河保护区及其支流河岸草本植物群落数量分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(5):904-911.
苏维词.三峡库区消落带的生态环境问题及其调控[J].长江科学院院报,2004,21(2):32-34,41.
任雪梅,杨达源,徐永辉,等. 三峡库区消落带的植被生态工程[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(1):42-43,49.
钟荣华,贺秀斌,鲍玉海,等. 狗牙根和牛鞭草的消浪减蚀作用[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):133-140.
周紫璇,陆颖,钟荣华,等.大坝运行对水库消落带土壤环境影响研究进展[J].水文,2019,39(1):15-19.
程瑞梅,王晓荣,肖文发,等.消落带研究进展[J].林业科学,2010,46(4):111-119.
李彦杰,杨俊年,刘仁华,等.水淹胁迫下三峡库区消落带适生狗牙根转录因子的转录组分析[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(2):265-269.
卢刚,徐高福,刘乐群,等.中国水库消落带植被恢复研究进展[J].浙江林业科技,2016,36(1):72-80.
张爱英,熊高明,樊大勇,等. 三峡水库蓄水对长江干流河岸植物组成的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(1):145-153.
樊大勇,熊高明,张爱英,等.三峡库区水位调度对消落带生态修复中物种筛选实践的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2015,39(4):416-432.
中国大坝工程学会.云南澜沧江小湾水电站[J].城乡建设,2019(17):76-77.
Baatz M, Schape A, Multiresolution segmentation:An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation[C]//Beiträge zum AGIT-Symposium. 2000.
孙荣,袁兴中,刘红,等.三峡水库消落带植物群落组成及物种多样性[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(2):208-214.
王建超,朱波,汪涛.三峡库区典型消落带淹水后草本植被的自然恢复特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(5):603-610.
郭燕,杨邵,沈雅飞,等.三峡水库消落带现存植物自然分布特征与群落物种多样性研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4255-4265.
雷波,王业春,由永飞,等.三峡水库不同间距高程消落带草本植物群落物种多样性与结构特征[J].湖泊科学,2014,26(4):600-606.
国家气象信息中心.中国气象数据网(2012-08-04)[2021-06-29] http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_DAY_V3.0.html.
王宗明,宋开山,刘殿伟,等.地形因子对三江平原土地利用/覆被变化的影响研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(6):10-15,2.
蔡宏,何政伟,安艳玲,等.基于RS和GIS的赤水河流域植被覆盖度与各地形因子的相关强度研究[J].地球与环境,2014,42(4):518-524.
程圣东,李占斌,鲁克新,等.文安驿流域植被覆盖度时空分异及其与地貌因子关系研究[J].西安理工大学学报,2011,27(2):145-150.
0
浏览量
735
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621