内蒙古清水河县公益林区不同林地类型枯落物层水文效应

朱家晸; 秦富仓; 李龙; 杨振奇; 张若曦

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

内蒙古清水河县公益林区不同林地类型枯落物层水文效应

试验研究

- 内蒙古清水河县公益林区不同林地类型枯落物层水文效应
- Hydrological Effects of Litter Layer of Five Different Forest Land Types at Public Welfare Forest Area of Qingshuihe County, Inner Mongolia
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第1期页码：114-121
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
  2. 荒漠生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010000
  3. 水利部牧区科学研究所,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划重点专项“清水河公益林综合效益监测”(GEF-NMG-201602);内蒙古农业大学人才引进项目(NDYB2017-21)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.016
  中图分类号： S715.3
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱家晸, 秦富仓, 李龙, 等. 内蒙古清水河县公益林区不同林地类型枯落物层水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):114-121.

Zhu Jiazheng, Qin Fucang, Li Long, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litter Layer of Five Different Forest Land Types at Public Welfare Forest Area of Qingshuihe County, Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 114-121.
朱家晸, 秦富仓, 李龙, 等. 内蒙古清水河县公益林区不同林地类型枯落物层水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):114-121. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.016.

Zhu Jiazheng, Qin Fucang, Li Long, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litter Layer of Five Different Forest Land Types at Public Welfare Forest Area of Qingshuihe County, Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 114-121. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.016.

摘要

[目的

]

针对内蒙古清水河县公益林区主要人工林地林下枯落物层水文效应展开研究，以期为今后黄土丘陵区水源涵养林建设以及防治水土流失等工作提供参考依据。[方法

]

以内蒙古清水河县公益林区内5种主要人工林地林下枯落物层为研究对象，采用野外实地调查取样和室内浸泡方法，利用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行相关性检验以及线性回归分析。[结果

]

①5种林型的枯落物层总蓄积量变动范围在8.49～25.52 t/hm

之间，总体趋势与厚度表现基本一致。具体表现为：针阔混交林>油松林>落叶松林>山杏林>乔灌混交林；②5种林型总最大持水量变动范围为10.10～38.82 t/hm

，具体表现为：针阔混交林>山杏林>油松林>落叶松林>乔灌混交林；③5种林型总有效拦蓄量变动范围为8.58～36.97 t/hm

，总体趋势与最大拦蓄量一致，具体表现为：针阔混交林>山杏林>油松林>落叶松林>乔灌混交林；④5种林型枯落物层的动态持水过程大致可分为3个阶段，分别为快速吸水阶段(0.5—2 h)，吸水减缓阶段(2—6 h)，稳定(饱和)吸水阶段(6—24 h)。[结论

]

阔叶树种的枯落物层持水能力要强于针叶林种，5种林型中枯落物层水源涵养能力最佳的为针阔混交林。

Abstract

[Objective] The hydrological effects of the litter layer under the main artificial forests in Qingshuihe County

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region were studied in order to provide a reference for the construction of water conservation forests and for the prevention and control of soil erosion in the loess hilly area in the future. [Methods] The study location consisted of five main artificial forests at the public welfare forest area of Qingshuihe County

Inner Mongolia. The experimental methods were mainly field survey sampling and the indoor immersion method

with SPSS 22.0 software used to correlate the obtained data

test the data for significant differences due to forest type

and conduct linear regression analysis. [Results] ① The total volume of the litter layer of the five forest types ranged from 8.49 t/ha to 25.52 t/ha

and the overall trend was basically consistent with the thickness performance. The specific performance followed the order of coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest>Pinus tabuliformis forest>Larix gmelinii forest>Armeniaca sibirica forest>arbor-shrub mixed forest; ② The total maximum water holding capacity of the five forest types ranged from 10.10 t/ha to 38.82 t/ha

and the specific performance followed the order of coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest>A. sibirica forest>P. tabuliformis forest>L. gmelinii forest>arbor-shrub mixed forest; ③ The total effective storage capacity of the five forest types varied from 8.58 t/ha to 36.97 t/ha. The overall trend was consistent with the maximum storage capacity. The specific performance followed the order of mixed coniferous and broadleaf trees forest>A. sibirica forest>P. tabuliformis forest>L. gmelinii forest>arbor and shrub mixed forest; ④ The dynamic water holding process of the five forest types of litter layer could be roughly divided into three stages: the rapid water absorption stage (0.5—2 h); the slow water absorption stage (2—6 h); and the stable (saturated) water absorption stage (6—24 h). [Conclusion] The water-holding capacity of the litter layer of broad-leaved tree species is stronger than that of coniferous forest species. Among the five forest types

the litter layer water conservation capacity is the best in the coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest.

关键词

Keywords

references

张增哲,余新晓.中国森林水文研究现状和主要成果[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,10(2):79-87.

耿绍波,杨晓菲,饶良懿,等.缙云山黛湖保护站不同林地枯落物及土壤持水性研究[J].世界林业研究,2009,22(特刊):49-51.

Turetsky M R, Crow S E, Evans R J, et al. Trade-offs in resource allocation among moss species control decomposition in boreal peatlands[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008,96(6):1297-1305.

吴迪,辛学兵,裴顺祥,等.北京九龙山8种林分的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(3):78-86.

高艳鹏.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区主要树种人工林密度效应评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.

José A V. Field studies of hillslope flow processes[J]. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 2013,9(0):227-293.

Sun Dan, Zhang Weixin, Lin Yongbiao, et al. Soil erosion and water retention varies with plantation type and age[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018,422:1-10.

王鹏程.三峡库区森林植被水源涵养功能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.

Robertson S M C, Hornung M, Kennedy V H. Water chemistry of throughfall and soil water under four tree species at Gisburn, Northwest England, before and after felling[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,129(1/2/3):101-117.

刘宇,张洪江,张友焱,等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):69-74.

Pang Xueyong, Bao Weikai. Effect of Subsituting Plantation Species for Native Shrubs on the Water-holding Characteristics of the Forest Floor on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011,2(3):217-224.

杨寒月,张光辉,张宝军.黄土丘陵区沟坡典型植物群落枯落物蓄积量及其持水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(3):83-90.

Sato Y, Kumagai T, Kume A, et al. Experimental analysis of moisture dynamics of litter layers:The effects of rainfall conditions and leaf shapes[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2004,18(16):3007-3018.

韩春,陈宁,等.森林生态系统水文调节功能及机制研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(7):2191-2199.

王凤友.森林调落量研究综述[J].生态学进展,1989,6(2):82-89.

胡静霞,杨新兵,朱辰光,等.冀西北地区4种纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):304-310.

赵洋毅,王玉杰,王云琦,等.渝北水源区水源涵养林构建模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(15):4162-4172.

杨振奇,秦富仓,李晓琴,等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):118-122.

Magnani F, Consiglio L, Erhard M, et al. Growth patterns and carbon balance of

Pinus radiata

and

Pseudotsuga menziesii

plantations under climate change scenarios in Italy[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004,202(1/2/3):93-105.

何理深.云南松林分蓄积量的影响因子分析[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,39(6):116-122.

Kim M, Lee W K, Cui Guishan, et al. Estimating stand volume

Pinus densiflora

forest based on climate change scenario in Korea[J]. Journal of Korean Forest Society, 2014,103(1):105-112.

孙欧文,蔡建国,吴家森,等.浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):118-123.

李璐杉.昆明车木河水库水源地不同森林类型枯落物与土壤特性及水源涵养功能研究[D].云南昆明:云南师范大学,2020.

浏览量

687

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

北京市松山不同海拔油松林枯落物及土壤水文效应

青海高寒区人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应

不同经营年限山核桃林地枯落物和土壤的水文效应

山桃沙棘混交林养分状况研究

红壤侵蚀区几种水土保持林水文效应研究