1. 西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
2. 陕西省引汉济渭工程建设有限公司,陕西,西安,710011
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
蔡雅梅, 冯民权, 肖瑜. 人类活动对河岸带植被氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响——以汾河临汾段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):17-25.
Cai Yamei, Feng Minquan, Xiao Yu. Effects of Human Activities on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Ecological Stoichiometry of Vegetation in Riparian Zones -A Case Study at Linfen Section of Fenhe River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 17-25.
蔡雅梅, 冯民权, 肖瑜. 人类活动对河岸带植被氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响——以汾河临汾段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):17-25. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.003.
Cai Yamei, Feng Minquan, Xiao Yu. Effects of Human Activities on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Ecological Stoichiometry of Vegetation in Riparian Zones -A Case Study at Linfen Section of Fenhe River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 17-25. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.003.
[目的] 探究自然河岸带和强人工干扰河岸带土壤—植被系统氮、磷生态化学计量的变化规律,为该区域的河岸带修复和环境保护提供科学依据。[方法] 利用相关分析和偏冗余分析等方法,以汾河临汾段典型河岸带为例,探讨自然河岸带及强人工干扰河岸带土壤—植被系统氮、磷含量的时空分布特性及其影响因素。[结果] 河岸带植被总氮(TN),总磷(TP)含量随枯水期—平水期—丰水期表现为先减小后增大的趋势,近岸处植物TN,TP含量大于远岸处植物TN,TP含量。河岸带植被TN,TP内稳性表现为自然河岸带>强人工干扰河岸带,两处河岸带植物TP属弱敏感态指标,N/P存在绝对稳态。河岸带土壤pH值、TN及TP含量与植物氮、磷含量的交互作用较为明显。[结论] 汾河临汾段典型河岸带植被氮、磷时空分布与河岸带土壤氮、磷时空分布特性相似,人类活动对河岸带土壤—植被系统氮、磷生态化学计量特征具有重要影响。
[Objective] Changes in the ecological stoichiometry of nitrogen and phosphorus in a natural riparian zone and a strongly artificial disturbed riparian zone were explored in order to provide a scientific basis for the restoration of riparian zones and environmental protection in the Linfen section of the Fenhe River. [Methods] The spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and influencing factors of nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil-plant system between a natural riparian zone and a strongly artificial disturbed riparian zone were studied by correlation analysis and partial redundancy analysis methods. [Results] The contents of plant total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in riparian zones decreased first and then increased during the period of dry season
normal season
wet season. The contents of plant TN and TP in the near-bank area were higher than in the far-bank area. The internal stability of plant TN and TP in riparian zones was higher in the natural riparian zone than in the strongly artificial disturbed riparian zone. Plant TP values in the two riparian zones were weakly sensitive to state index
and N/P values were absolutely stable. The interaction of soil pH value
TN
and TP
with plant TN and TP contents were obvious in riparian zones. [Conclusion] The spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil-plant system were similar to those in soil in typical riparian zones of the Linfen section of the Fenhe River. The ecological stochiometric characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus of the soil-plant system were significantly affected by human activities.
夏继红,严忠民.生态河岸带研究进展与发展趋势[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(3):252-255.
钱进,沈蒙蒙,王沛芳,等.河岸带土壤磷素空间分布及其对水文过程响应[J].水科学进展,2017,28(1):41-48.
郭二辉,方晓,马丽,等.河岸带农田不同恢复年限对土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响:以温榆河为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3785-3794.
Deutschewitz K, Lausch A, Kühn I, et al. Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2003,12(4):299-311.
Meeson N, Robertson A I, Jansen A. The effects of flooding and livestock on post-dispersal seed predation in river red gum habitats[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,39(2):247-258.
Dybala K E, Matzek V, Gardali T, et al. Carbon sequestration in riparian forests:A global synthesis and meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2019,25(1):57-67.
Czortek P, Dyderski M K, Jagodziński A M. River regulation drives shifts in urban riparian vegetation over three decades[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020,47:126524.
杨波.河岸缓冲带对辽河面源污染的阻控作用研究[D].吉林长春:吉林大学,2018.
孟亦奇,吴永波,朱颖,等.利用河岸缓冲带去除径流水中氮的研究[J].湿地科学,2016,14(4):532-537.
赵清贺,马丽娇,刘倩,等.黄河中下游典型河岸带植物物种多样性及其对环境的响应[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(5):1325-1331.
孙荣,邓伟琼,李修明.三峡库区典型次级河流河岸植被分布格局:以重庆东河为例[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(10):2733-2741.
Hood J M, Sterner R W. Diet mixing:Do animals integrate growth or resources across temporal heterogeneity?[J]. the American Naturalist, 2010,176(5):651-663.
Persson J, Fink P, Goto A, et al. To be or not to be what you eat:regulation of stoichiometric homeostasis among autotrophs and heterotrophs[J]. Oikos, 2010,119(5):741-751.
吴鹏,崔迎春,赵文君,等.喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(3):80-92.
尹逊霄,华珞,张振贤,等.土壤中磷素的有效性及其循环转化机制研究[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(3):95-101.
常超,谢宗强,熊高明,等.三峡水库蓄水对消落带土壤理化性质的影响[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1236-1244.
张静静.土壤酸碱度调控对内蒙古草原植被群落及养分特征的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.
杨晓娟,李春俭.机械压实对土壤质量、作物生长、土壤生物及环境的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(7):2008-2015.
Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil:Is there a "Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass?[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007,85(3):235-252.
Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N:P ratio:A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. the Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996,33(6):1441-1450.
Yu Qiang, Chen Quansheng, Elser J, et al. Linking stoichiometric homeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability[J]. Nature Precedings, 2010,13:1390-1399.
陈婵,张仕吉,李雷达,等.中亚热带植被恢复阶段植物叶片、凋落物、土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(8):658-671.
Li Yuefen, Li Qingyu, Guo Dongyan, et al. Ecological stoichiometry homeostasis of
Leymus chinensis
in degraded grassland in western Jilin Province, NE China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,90:387-391.
金相灿,颜昌宙,许秋瑾.太湖北岸湖滨带观测场水生植物群落特征及其影响因素分析[J].湖泊科学,2007,19(2):151-157.
贺纪正,陆雅海,傅伯杰.土壤生物学前沿[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.
Gruber B R, Schultz H R. Coupling of plant to soil water status at different vineyard sites[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2005(689):381-390.
高宗宝.呼伦贝尔草甸草原优势植物碳氮磷化学计量特征对氮磷添加的响应[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2016.
赵从举,康慕谊,雷加强.准噶尔盆地典型地段植物群落及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学报,2011,31(10):2669-2677.
Zhang Xiaolong, Zhou Jihua, Guan T, et al. Spatial variation in leaf nutrient traits of dominant desert riparian plant species in an arid inland river basin of China[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2019,9(3):1523-1531.
袁建钰,李广,闫丽娟,等.黄土高原不同灌水量下春小麦土壤与植物碳氮磷含量及其化学计量比特征[J].草业科学,2020,37(9):1803-1812.
李雪盈,濮励杰,许艳,等.江苏沿海典型滩涂围垦区土壤有机碳时空异质性[J].土壤,2020,52(2):365-371.[
0
浏览量
672
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621