1. 山东农业大学 林学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 水利部 水土保持监测中心,北京,100053
3. 兰考县水利局, 河南 兰考,475300
4. 淮河水利委员会 淮河流域水土保持监测中心站,安徽,蚌埠,233001
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
李鑫浩, 曹文华, 牛勇, 等. 黄泛平原区风沙土物理结皮硬度和厚度特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):63-68.
Li Xinhao, Cao Wenhua, NIU Yong, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Hardness and Thickness of Aeolian Sandy Soil Crust at Sandy Area of Yellow River Floodplain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 63-68.
李鑫浩, 曹文华, 牛勇, 等. 黄泛平原区风沙土物理结皮硬度和厚度特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):63-68. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.001.
Li Xinhao, Cao Wenhua, NIU Yong, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Hardness and Thickness of Aeolian Sandy Soil Crust at Sandy Area of Yellow River Floodplain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 63-68. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.01.001.
[目的
]
开展黄泛区沙地结皮硬度、厚度特征及其影响因素研究,为该区域结皮抗蚀机理研究提供科学参考。[方法
]
以黄泛区风沙土为研究对象,设置一年两熟耕地(T
1
)、一年一熟耕地(T
2
)、裸地(T
3
)、自然恢复地(T
4
)4种下垫面条件,开展土壤结皮硬度、厚度以及土壤、气象和植被等影响因子的定位观测,并采用统计检验和相关性分析方法探索土壤结皮厚度和硬度与其影响因子之间的关系。[结果
]
4种下垫面条件下的土壤结皮平均硬度大小依次为:T
3
>T
4
>T
1
>T
2
。T
1
,T
2
土壤结皮硬度与温度、植被高度、植被覆盖度和近地表风速具有显著相关关系(p<0.05)。土壤平均结皮厚度大小依次为:T
1
>T
3
>T
2
>T
4
;T
1
,T
2
土壤结皮厚度和近地表风速呈显著正相关关系(p<0.05);T
3
,T
4
土壤结皮厚度和累计补水量、土壤温度显著相关(p<0.05)。耕作条件下,植被高度对结皮硬度和厚度变化的贡献度最高,贡献度达37%以上;无耕作条件下,近地表风速和累计补水量分别对结皮硬度和厚度变化的贡献度最高,贡献度分别达到51%和45%以上。[结论
]
人为耕作不利于黄泛平原风沙区风沙土结皮的形成和硬度的保持。植被、近地表风速、温度是影响风沙土结皮硬度和厚度的重要外部因素。风沙土结皮厚度、硬度变化趋势与表层含水量表现出同步变化的特征,其中土壤结皮硬度的响应存在一定的滞后性。有无耕作,风沙土土壤结皮硬度和厚度的主要驱动因子也不相同。
[Objective] The characteristics of the hardness and thickness of a sandy soil crust in Yellow River floodplain and their influencing factors were studied in order to provide scientific references for the protection of soil resources. [Methods] Four different underlying surface treatments
i.e.
cultivated land with two crops in a year (T1)
cultivated land with one crop in a year (T2)
bare land (T3)
and spontaneous recovery land (T4)
were designed to conduct the experiment. The hardness and thickness of the soil crust
meteorological factors
and vegetation factors were observed and recorded
and the relationships among the hardness and thickness of soil crust and influencing factors were explored by statistical tests and correlation analysis. [Results] The average value of soil crust hardness of T3 was the highest among the four treatments
followed by T4
T1
and T2. Significant correlations between soil crust hardness and soil temperature
vegetation height
vegetation coverage
and near-ground surface wind speed were observed under T1 and T2 (p<0.05). The soil crust thickness of T1 was the highest
followed by T3
T2
T4. There was a significant positive correlation between soil crust thickness and near-surface wind speed for T1 and T2 (p<0.05)
and soil crust thickness was significantly correlated with cumulative water replenishment and soil temperature (p<0.05) under T3 and T4. For the treatments located in cultivated land
the contribution of vegetation to crust hardness and thickness was the highest
reaching 37%. For the treatments located in uncultivated land
the contribution of near-ground surface wind speed and cumulative water replenishment to crust thickness and hardness was above 51% and 45%
respectively. [Conclusion] Artificial cultivation was not conducive to the formation of aeolian sandy soil crust and the maintenance of hardness in the Yellow River floodplain. Crust thickness and hardness were significantly affected by vegetation
temperature
and wind speed near the ground surface. Aeolian sandy soil crust thickness
hardness change trend
and surface water content showed the characteristics of synchronous change
while the response of soil crust hardness exhibited some hysteresis. The main driving factors of soil crust hardness and thickness of aeolian sandy soil with cultivation measures were different from those without cultivation measures.
李智广,袁利.淮河流域黄泛平原风沙区水土流失监管重点[J].中国水土保持,2020(7):7-10,60.
Singer M J, J Skujinš. Physical properties of arid region soils[M]//Semiarid Lands & Deserts CRC Press,1991:93-122.
李晓丽,申向东.结皮土壤的抗风蚀性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):203-207.
Xu Hengkang, Zhang Yingjun, Shao Xinqing, et al. Soil nitrogen and climate drive the positive effect of biological soil crusts on soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands:A Meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,803:150030.
Yan Shiwei, Yang Jianhao, Zhou Song, et al. Biological soil crusts alleviate the stress of arsenic on rice germination and the underlying immobilization mechanisms[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021,227:112839.
Rodríguez-Caballero E, Reyes A, Kratz A, et al. Effects of climate change and land use intensification on regional biological soil crust cover and composition in Southern Africa[J]. Geoderma,2022,406:115508.
方海燕,屈建军,俎瑞平,等.防沙工程的结皮效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):17-20.
袁丹婷.VAc-MA共聚物固沙抑尘剂的合成与研究[D].北京:北京化工大学,2012.
蔡强国,吴淑安,陈浩,等.坡耕地表土结皮对降雨径流和侵蚀产沙过程的影响[C]//陈永宗,等.晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律试验研究文集.北京:水利电力出版社,1990.48-57.
吴发启,范文波.土壤结皮与降雨溅蚀的关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(3):1-3.
段争虎,刘新民,屈建军.沙坡头地区土壤结皮形成机理的研究[J].干旱区研究,1996,13(2):31-36.
袁利,张春强,张芷温,等.淮河流域黄泛平原风沙区水土流失格局[J].中国水土保持,2019(12):10-13.
Ekwue E I. Effects of peat content, rainfall duration and aggregate size on soil crust strength[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010,16(6):485-498.
Ahmad N, Roblin A J. Crusting of river estate soil, Trinidad, and its effect on gaseous diffusion, percolation, and seedling emergence[J]. Journal of Soil Science,1971,22(1):23-31.
Hussain S M, Smillie G W, Collins J F. Laboratory studies of crust development in Irish and Iraqi soils (Ⅰ):Moisture content, penetration resistance, aggregate size and seedling emergence of spring barley (
Hordeum vulgare
L.)[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1985,5(1):33-53.
吴发启,范文波.坡耕地黄墡土结皮的理化性质分析[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(4):22-24.
李元元.化学材料对风蚀调控试验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.
王军,陈世正.四川紫色水稻土胶体比表面及其主要影响因素研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1991,13(3):64-69.
刘均阳,周正朝,苏雪萌.植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):267-273,298.
赵富王,王宁,苏雪萌,等.黄土丘陵区主要植物根系对土壤有机质和团聚体的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):105-113.
0
浏览量
611
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621