花岗岩侵蚀区不同水土流失治理模式下的植物多样性特征

彭浪; 段剑; 刘士余; 汤崇军; 郑海金

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20211014.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

花岗岩侵蚀区不同水土流失治理模式下的植物多样性特征

试验研究

- 花岗岩侵蚀区不同水土流失治理模式下的植物多样性特征
- Characteristics of Plant Diversity Under Different Soil and Water Loss Control Models in Granite Erosion Area
- 水土保持通报 2022年42卷第1期页码：191-197
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院,江西,南昌,330045
  2. 江西省水利科学院江西省土壤侵蚀与防治重点实验室,江西,南昌,330029
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目课题“红壤低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理模式和对策”(2017YFC0505406);江西省自然科学基金(20192BAB214008);江西省水利科技项目(201921YBKT2,01821ZDKT17);江西省博士后科研项目择优资助项目(2019KY49)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20211014.001
  中图分类号： S157.2
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
彭浪, 段剑, 刘士余, 等. 花岗岩侵蚀区不同水土流失治理模式下的植物多样性特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):191-197.

Peng Lang, Duan Jian, Liu Shiyu, et al. Characteristics of Plant Diversity Under Different Soil and Water Loss Control Models in Granite Erosion Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 191-197.
彭浪, 段剑, 刘士余, 等. 花岗岩侵蚀区不同水土流失治理模式下的植物多样性特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022,42(1):191-197. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20211014.001.

Peng Lang, Duan Jian, Liu Shiyu, et al. Characteristics of Plant Diversity Under Different Soil and Water Loss Control Models in Granite Erosion Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1): 191-197. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20211014.001.

摘要

[目的] 对比不同治理模式治理模式下植物群落结构及其多样性差异，为水土流失治理与植被恢复提供科学依据。[方法] 以江西省兴国县塘背小流域为研究区域，选取果园开发(模式A)、生态恢复(模式B)为水土流失主要治理模式，以次生林、未人为治理样地(对照，CK)作为对照样地，采用群落学样方调查法，调查分析各林地植物群落的物种组成、群落结构及植物多样性。[结果] ①模式A、模式B、次生林、CK的乔灌层优势种分别为脐橙、马尾松、青冈和马尾松。草本层优势种在模式A中为马唐、其余3组均为芒萁。相较CK，模式A群落结构发生改变，模式B的群落结构并没有改变，仍以马尾松、芒萁等阳性先锋植物为主；②次生林的物种丰富度、辛普森多样性指数、香农—威纳指数和均匀度指数均最高，相较于CK，模式A、模式B对于物种丰富度及植物多样性均有提升，两者多样性水平相近；③各样地植物群落组成整体表现为极不相似，共有植物种仅有一种。相较于模式A，模式B、次生林和CK之间的群落组成较为相似。[结论] 进行水土流失治理有利于植被的恢复。果园开发模式在满足水土流失治理和植被恢复的同时，具备一定的经济效益，是值得推广的水土流失治理模式。

Abstract

[Objective] Differences in plant community structure and diversity under different control models were compared in order to provide a scientific basis for soil erosion control and vegetation restoration measures. [Methods] The Tangbei small watershed in Xingguo County

Jiangxi Province was selected as the research area

and orchard development (model A) and ecological restoration (model B) were selected as the main soil and water loss control models. Selected secondary forests and no artificial governance forest land (control

CK) were used as control plots

and the community sampling method was used to investigate and analyze species composition

community structure

and plant diversity of the plant communities at each woodland location. [Results] ① The dominant species in model A

model B

secondary forest

and CK arbor-irrigation were Citrus sinensis

Pinus massoniana

Cyclobalanopsis glauca

and P. massoniana

respectively. The dominant species in the herbaceous layer were Digitaria sanguinalis in model A

and in the other three groups the dominant species were Dicranopteris pedata. Compared with the CK

the community structure of model A had changed

and the community structure of model B had not changed

still being dominated by positive pioneer plants such as P. massoniana and D. pedata. ② Species richness

Simpson diversity index

Shannon-Wiener index

and Evenness index of the secondary forest were the highest. Compared with the CK

models A and B had improved species richness and plant diversity

but both of these factors were lower than those of the secondary forest. The level of diversity was similar. ③ The overall performance of the plant communities in the four woodlands was very different

and there was only one plant species in common. Compared with model A

the community composition of model B

secondary forest

and CK were more similar. [Conclusion] Controlling soil erosion is beneficial to the restoration of vegetation. The orchard development model not only meets the requirements of soil erosion control and vegetation recovery

but also has certain economic benefits. It is a model worthy popularizing for soil and water loss control.

关键词

Keywords

references

何圣嘉,谢锦升,杨智杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):65-70.

袁再健,马东方,聂小东,等.南方红壤丘陵区林下水土流失防治研究进展[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):12-21.

谢锦升,杨玉盛,解明曙.亚热带花岗岩侵蚀红壤的生态退化与恢复技术[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):154-156.

刘政,许文斌,田地,等.南方红壤严重侵蚀地不同恢复年限马尾松人工林生态系统碳储量特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):37-42.

尹丽洁,尹远志.长江流域花岗岩地区水土流失治理[J].中国水利,2003(10):30-31.

阮伏水.福建省崩岗侵蚀与治理模式探讨[J].山地学报,2003,21(6):675-680.

邹亚荣,张增祥,周全斌,等.GIS支持下的江西省水土流失生态环境风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):48-50.

肖胜生,王聪,郭利平,等.南方红壤丘陵区水土保持生态服务功能提升研究进展:以江西省兴国县塘背河小流域为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(6):289-294.

王芸,欧阳志云,郑华,等.南方红壤区3种典型森林恢复方式对植物群落多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1204-1211.

Rey Benayas J M, Newton A C, Diaz A, et al. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration:A meta-analysis[J].Science, 2009,325(5944):1121-1124.

Malcolm D C, Mason W L, Clarke G C. The transformation of conifer forests in Britain:Regeneration, gap size and silvicultural systems[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001,151(1/2/3):7-23.

Worm B, Barbier E B, Beaumont N, et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services[J]. Science,2006,314(5800):787-790.

Zhang Jintun, Dong Yiru. Factors affecting species diversity of plant communities and the restoration process in the loess area of China[J].Ecological Engineering, 2010,36(3):345-350.

涂安国,杨洁,李英,等.赣江流域水土保持生态建设减水减沙效益评价[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):148-151.

刘晓燕,杨胜天,王富贵,等.黄土高原现状梯田和林草植被的减沙作用分析[J].水利学报,2014,45(11):1293-1300.

邹贵友.水土保持措施及其减水减沙效益分析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2014(3):203.

陈洋,张海东,于东升,等.南方红壤区植被结构类型与降雨模式对林下水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(5):150-157.

夏卫平.南方红壤区锥栗园水土流失防治技术实施探讨[J].亚热带水土保持,2020,32(4):30-31,39.

徐义保.南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失过程研究[D].福建福州:福建师范大学,2012.

郭利平,宋月君,叶忠铭,等.水土保持措施对塘背小流域典型林地植被恢复状况的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(4):67-74.

兴国县农牧渔业局.塘背小流域治理后农业生产效益调查报告[C]//江西省水土保持小流域技术资料汇编.南昌:江西省水土保持委员会办公室,1986.

江西省水土保持委员会办公室.江西省水土保持小流域技术资料汇编[C].南昌:江西省水土保持委员会办公室,1995.

林倩倩,王彬,马元丹,等.天目山国家级自然保护区毛竹林扩张对生物多样性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2014,42(9):43-47,71.

张金屯.数量生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

梅象信,徐正会,张继玲,等.昆明西山森林公园东坡蚂蚁物种多样性研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(2):170-176.

Wehenkel C, Corral-Rivas J J, Gadow K V. Quantifying differences between ecosystems with particular reference to selection forests in Durango/Mexico[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014,316(2):117-124.

陈林,辛佳宁,苏莹,等.异质生境对荒漠草原植物群落组成和种群生态位的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):6187-6205.

徐乃千,张敏,缪君翔.赣南地区果园经济条件下水土保持研究进展[J].南方农机,2017,48(21):72-74.

张华明,王昭艳,杨洁,等.红壤坡地不同果园套种模式水土保持效果研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):140-143.

黄国林,张孝岳,叶文明.柑橘园蓄生马唐草栽培效应研究[J].湖南农业科学,2009(2):127-128.

浏览量

590

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

红壤侵蚀区不同恢复年限植物群落演替规律

基于CiteSpace的中国荒漠植物多样性研究现状与热点分析

基于文献计量学的1993—2023年水土流失监测技术研究进展

公园城市背景下成都市环城生态区森林群落植物多样性

基于深度学习算法的山地植物多样性空间分布格局模拟