河南省沿黄干流地区社会—生态—生产景观恢复力演化特征及情景模拟

耿艺伟; 陈伟强; 张金鑫; 王珂; 张锋; 马月红

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210915.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

河南省沿黄干流地区社会—生态—生产景观恢复力演化特征及情景模拟

试验研究

- 河南省沿黄干流地区社会—生态—生产景观恢复力演化特征及情景模拟
- Evolution Characteristics and Scenario Simulation of Social-Ecological-Productional Landscape Resilience in Areas Along Mainstream of Yellow River in He'nan Province
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第5期页码：181-190
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河南农业大学资源与环境学院,河南,郑州,450002
  2. 河南省土地整治与生态重建工程技术研究中心,河南,郑州,450002
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年项目“生态系统服务供需耦合关系研究”（41901259）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210915.001
  中图分类号： F301.2
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
耿艺伟, 陈伟强, 张金鑫, 等. 河南省沿黄干流地区社会—生态—生产景观恢复力演化特征及情景模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):181-190.

Geng Yiwei, Chen Weiqiang, Zhang Jinxin, et al. Evolution Characteristics and Scenario Simulation of Social-Ecological-Productional Landscape Resilience in Areas Along Mainstream of Yellow River in He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 181-190.
耿艺伟, 陈伟强, 张金鑫, 等. 河南省沿黄干流地区社会—生态—生产景观恢复力演化特征及情景模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):181-190. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210915.001.

Geng Yiwei, Chen Weiqiang, Zhang Jinxin, et al. Evolution Characteristics and Scenario Simulation of Social-Ecological-Productional Landscape Resilience in Areas Along Mainstream of Yellow River in He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 181-190. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210915.001.

摘要

[目的] 定量研究河南省沿黄干流地区2000—2018年社会—生态—生产景观恢复力的演化特征，指导沿黄地市社会生活，生态资源环境与农业生产活动的协调发展。[方法] 通过构建SEPLR （social-ecological-production landscape resilience，社会—生态—生产景观恢复力）评估框架，运用有序加权平均法设置情景偏好，绘制不同政策引导下恢复力预测图。[结果] ①从总体特征看，2000—2018年河南省沿黄干流地区SEPLR值为0.47～0.52之间，呈上升趋势，城市间空间差异逐渐增大，指数相似地区集中分布。②演化特征上，社会系统恢复力和生态系统恢复力缓慢增强，分别在0.14～0.65，0.08～0.30波动，生产系统恢复力变化微弱，在0.12～0.31波动；空间上，SEPLR及各子系统整体呈“中部强两边弱”的分布态势，层级结构具有集聚性。[结论] 河南省沿黄地市在“维持现状型”“生态优先型”“开发优先型”“农业优先型”4种政策情景下，“生态优先型”恢复力最高，未来黄河流域高质量发展应考虑“生态优先型”政策引导。

Abstract

[Objective] The evolution characteristics of social-ecological-production landscape resilience in areas along the mainstream of the Yellow River in He'nan Province from 2000 to 2018 was quantitatively determined in order to guide the coordinated development of social life

ecological resources

the environment

and agricultural production activities in this region.[Methods] We constructed the social-ecological-productional landscape resilience (SEPLR) assessment framework to quantitatively study the evolution characteristics of the social-ecological-productional landscape resilience in He'nan Province along the mainstream of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2018. An ordered weighted average method was used to set up scenario preferences and to draw a map of resilience prediction under the guidance of various policies.[Results] ① Based on the overall characteristics

the SEPLR value of the areas along the mainstream of the Yellow River in He'nan Province from 2000 to 2018 varied from 0.47 to 0.52

presenting an upward trend. The spatial differences between cities kept expanding gradually. ② From the perspective of evolution characteristics

social system resilience and ecosystem resilience increased slowly

fluctuating between 0.14~0.65 and 0.08~0.30

respectively

and the production system resilience slightly fluctuated between 0.12~0.31. In terms of space

SEPLR and its subsystems overall presented a distribution pattern of "being strong in the center and weak on both sides"

and the hierarchical structure was concentrated.[Conclusion] For cities along the Yellow River in He'nan Province

the resilience of "ecology first" was the highest of the four policy scenarios of "maintaining the status quo" "ecology first" "development first" and "agriculture first". In the future

the high-quality development of the Yellow River basin should be guided by the"ecology-first" policy.

关键词

Keywords

references

Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R, et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9(2):1-9.

马楠, 闵庆文, 焦雯珺, 等.基于SEPLS模型的GIAHS恢复力评估框架及其在保护成效评估中的应用[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(9):1361-1369.

Carl F. Resilience:the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3):253-267.

Bailey I, Buck L E. Managing for resilience:A landscape framework for food and livelihood security and ecosystem services[J]. Food Security, 2016, 8(3):477-490.

Jiménez-Medina P, Artal-Tur A, Sánchez-Casado N. Tourism business, place identity, sustainable development, and urban resilience:A focus on the sociocultural dimension[J]. International Regional Science Review, 2021, 44(1):170-199.

Cumming G S. Spatial resilience:Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2011, 26(7):899-909.

张行, 梁小英, 刘迪, 等.生态脆弱区社会-生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J].地理学报, 2019, 74(7):1450-1466.

王群, 陆林, 杨兴柱.千岛湖社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J].地理学报, 2015, 70(5):779-795.

贾慧, 陈海, 毛南赵, 等.高度敏感生态脆弱区景观可持续性评价[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(6):1277-1286.

秦会艳, 关赢, 黄颖利.黑龙江省国有林区贫困-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机制[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(9):821-829.

余中元, 李波, 张新时.社会生态系统及脆弱性驱动机制分析[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(7):1870-1879.

刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等.基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价[J].地理学报, 2015, 70(7):1052-1067.

展亚荣, 盖美.滨海旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力测度及协调发展研究[J].地域研究与开发, 2018, 37(5):158-164.

Rescia A J, Ortega M. Quantitative evaluation of the spatial resilience to the

B. oleae

pest in olive grove socio-ecological landscapes at different scales[J].Ecological Indicators, 2018, 84:820-827.

Liu Meiling, Liu Xiangnan, Wu Ling, et al. Establishing forest resilience indicators in the hilly red soil region of Southern China from vegetation greenness and landscape metrics using dense Landsat time series[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121:106985.

刘家旗, 茹少峰.基于生态足迹理论的黄河流域可持续发展研究[J].改革, 2020(9):139-148.

彭翀, 王静.河南省经济空间带动性发展格局及其城镇化空间策略研究[J].经济地理, 2014, 34(9):68-73.

汪芳, 安黎哲, 党安荣, 等.黄河流域人地耦合与可持续人居环境[J].地理研究, 2020, 39(8):1707-1724.

张佰发, 苗长虹.黄河流域土地利用时空格局演变及驱动力[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(3):460-473.

Beisner B E, Haydon D T, Cuddington K. Alternative stable states in ecology[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2003, 1(7):376-382.

UNU-IAS, Bioversity International, IGE, et al. Toolkit for the indicators of resilience in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes(SEPLS)[EB/OL].[2020-04-30].

尹莎, 杨新军, 陈佳.人地系统适应性研究进展:概念、理论框架与方法[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2):330-342.

Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Land use transitions:Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2):108-118.

王帅, 傅伯杰, 武旭同, 等.黄土高原社会-生态系统变化及其可持续性[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(1):96-103.

孙晶, 王俊, 杨新军.社会-生态系统恢复力研究综述[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(12):5371-5381.

宋世雄, 梁小英, 梅亚军, 等.基于CBDI的农户耕地撂荒行为模型构建及模拟研究:以陕西省米脂县冯阳坬村为例[J].自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11):1926-1937.

陈佳, 杨新军, 尹莎, 等.基于VSD框架的半干旱地区社会:生态系统脆弱性演化与模拟[J].地理学报, 2016, 71(7):1172-1188.

Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, et al. Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, and Climate Change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems[Z]. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series No.43, 2009.

乌宁巴特, 刘新平, 马相平.叶尔羌河流域土地生态脆弱性差异评价[J].干旱区地理, 2020, 43(3):849-858.

Zhang Lihui, Nie Qingyun, Chen Biying, et al. Multi-scale evaluation and multi-scenario simulation analysis of regional energy carrying capacity:Case study, China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 734:139440.

浏览量

774

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

省际交界地区土地利用及生态系统服务价值预测

基于农户尺度的社会-生态系统对干旱的恢复力研究--以甘肃省榆中县为例

农村土地整治项目CO2排放及减排政策下的情景模拟

粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度

河南省洪涝灾害的灾后恢复力研究