湖南农业大学 经济学院,湖南,长沙,410128
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
曾福生, 胡玄超. 基于全排列多边形图示法的湖南省耕地多功能强度与协调度研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):166-173.
Zeng Fusheng, Hu Xuanchao. Multi-functional Intensity and Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Hu'nan Province Based on Method of Entire Array Polygon Diagram[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 166-173.
曾福生, 胡玄超. 基于全排列多边形图示法的湖南省耕地多功能强度与协调度研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):166-173. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210603.001.
Zeng Fusheng, Hu Xuanchao. Multi-functional Intensity and Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Hu'nan Province Based on Method of Entire Array Polygon Diagram[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 166-173. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210603.001.
[目的] 探究湖南省耕地多功能综合强度与协调度,为该省提高耕地多功能管理水平提供科学参考。[方法] 采用全排列多边形图示法和系统聚类方法对2018年湖南省各县(区)的耕地多功能强度和协调度进行测算。[结果] ①湖南省各县(区)耕地多功能综合强度由湘西北部向湘中部、湘东南部弱化,多功能协调度由湘西部到湘中部再到湘东部先增强后减弱。②基于各单元单项功能强度,湖南省各县(区)耕地多功能呈现出5类发展模式:多功能弱协调模式、多功能协调模式、多功能强协调模式、生态优先型发展模式、社会主导型发展模式。空间上呈现出从湘西至湘中、湘东部地区,耕地多功能发展模式由生态优先型发展模式向多功能弱协调、多功能协调转换,最终又转变为耕地多功能弱协调发展模式。[结论] 研究结果与湖南省实施的“一圈一区两带”农业战略格局相符,能够比较客观地反映湖南省耕地多功能的空间状况。
[Objective] The multi-functional intensity and coordination of cultivated land in Hu’nan Province were analyzed to provide a reference for improving the multi-functional management level of cultivated land. [Methods] The multi-functional intensity and coordination of cultivated land in each county of Hu’nan Province in 2018 were calculated by using the entire-array-polygon diagram method and the systematic clustering method. [Results] ① The multi-functional comprehensive intensity of cultivated land in each county of Hu’nan Province weakened from the northwest to the central
and to the southeast areas
while the multi-functional coordination increased first
and then weakened from the west to the centre
and to the east of Hu’nan Province. ② Based on the individual functional intensity of each unit
the multi-functional development mode of cultivated land in each county of Hu’nan Province showed five types of development mode: multi-functional weak coordination mode
multi-function coordination mode
multi-functional strong coordination mode
ecological priority development mode
and social-led development mode. Spatially
from the west to the central and east areas of Hu’nan Province
cultivated land multi-functional development model changed from ecological priority development model to multi-functional weak coordination
multi-functional coordination transformation
and finally into cultivated land multi-functional weak coordinated development mode. [Conclusion] The results of the study are in line with the agricultural strategic pattern of “one circle
one district
two zones” implemented in Hu’nan Province
and can reflect the multi-functional spatial condition of cultivated land in Hu’nan Province objectively.
宋小青, 欧阳竹.中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J].自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4):540-551.
王枫, 董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(10):1698-1713.
Huang J, Tichit M, Poulot M, et al. Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2015, 149:138-147.
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological indicators, 2012, 21:17-29.
Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandermeulen V, Mettepenningen E, et al. Multifunctionality of agriculture:A review of definitions, evidence and instruments[J]. Living reviews in landscape research, 2007, 1(3):1-43.
Ferrari S, Rambonilaza M. Agricultural activities, rural areas and natural environment:Drawing up the frontiers of the multifunctionality concept[M]//Rural Landscapes and Agricultural Policies in Europe. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2009:21-34.
Fleskens L, Duarte F, Eicher I. A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems:A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2009, 25(1):141-155.
宋小青, 欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7):859-868.
姜广辉, 付晶, 谭雪晶, 等. 北京国土空间结构与未来空间秩序研究:基于主体功能区划框架[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(1):20-27.
邹利林, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 等. 基于要素视角的耕地"三生"功能理论建构与实证研究[J].地理研究, 2021, 40(3):839-855.
董鹏宇, 赵华甫.耕地多功能权衡与协同关系研究:以上海市青浦区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(2):368-375.
王成, 彭清, 唐宁, 等. 2005-2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究:以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(4):590-599.
朱庆莹, 胡伟艳, 赵志尚.耕地多功能权衡与协同时空格局的动态分析:以湖北省为例[J].经济地理, 2018, 38(7):143-153.
陈星宇, 王枫, 李灿.珠三角地区耕地多功能空间差异与影响因素分析[J].地域研究与开发, 2017, 36(1):130-136.
施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, 等. 北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J].资源科学, 2015, 37(2):247-257.
张一达, 刘学录, 任君, 等. 基于耕地多功能权衡与协同分析的耕地利用转型研究:以北京市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(6):25-33.
张利国, 王占岐, 柴季, 等. 湖北省耕地多功能地区差异及综合分区研究[J].地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(5):125-130.
范业婷, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 等. 苏南地区耕地多功能评价与空间特征分析[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(5):980-992.
宋小青, 欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7):859-868.
王成, 彭清, 唐宁, 等. 2005-2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究:以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(4):590-599.
马才学, 金莹, 柯新利, 等. 基于全排列多边形图示法的湖北省耕地多功能强度与协调度典型模式探究[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(4):51-58.
宋小青, 吴志峰, 欧阳竹.1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J].地理学报, 2014, 69(4):435-447.
孔祥斌, 张蚌蚌, 温良友, 等. 基于要素-过程-功能的耕地质量理论认识及其研究趋势[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(9):14-20.
杨雪, 谈明洪.近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5):733-743.
张建勇, 肖武, 王铮, 等. 基于全排列多边形图示指标法的土壤肥力质量评价[J].中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(10):1285-1292.
翁翎燕, 张超, 李伟霄.基于全排列多边形图示法的生态城市评价:以上海市为例[J].地球与环境, 2017, 45(3):356-362.
龚艳冰, 张继国, 梁雪春.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的水质评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(9):26-31.
王枫, 董玉祥.广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J].资源科学, 2015, 37(11):2179-2192.
0
浏览量
616
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621