1. 安徽省公共气象服务中心,安徽,合肥,230031
2. 安徽省气象科学研究所,安徽,合肥,230031
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
姚镇海, 吴丹娃, 褚荣浩, 等. 安徽省植被覆盖度动态变化及其对地形的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):283-290.
Yao Zhenhai, Wu Danwa, Chu Ronghao, et al. Dynamic Change of Vegetation Coverage and Its Response to Topography in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 283-290.
姚镇海, 吴丹娃, 褚荣浩, 等. 安徽省植被覆盖度动态变化及其对地形的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):283-290. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210430.001.
Yao Zhenhai, Wu Danwa, Chu Ronghao, et al. Dynamic Change of Vegetation Coverage and Its Response to Topography in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 283-290. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20210430.001.
[目的
]
探究安徽省植被覆盖度的时空变化特征与地形的相互关系,为当地资源开发中加强生态环境建设提供理论依据。[方法
]
在GIS与RS技术支持下,使用安徽省2001—2019年逐月MODIS/NDVI数据,2001—2019年土地分类数据和安徽省DEM海拔、坡向地形数据,分析植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其与地形因子相互关系。[结果
]
安徽省植被覆盖度季节变化特征明显。1月、10—12月,全省植被覆盖度呈现低值,且山区高于平原;2—5月,淮北平原地区植被覆盖度呈现高值,6月迅速减小;7—9月全省范围植被覆盖呈现高值,大部地区植被覆盖度高于0.8,山区平原空间差异最小。全省植被覆盖度年变化率为0.003 9/a,与时间相关性显著(R
2
=0.814 8)。不同海拔区间内,植被覆盖度四季差异明显。受下垫面地表类型影响,200 m以下植被覆盖度呈现低值,200~350 m植被覆盖度陡然升高,1 250 m以上植被覆盖度呈下降趋势。各坡向四季植被覆盖度夏季>秋季>春季>冬季。北坡、南坡分别为峰值、谷值。南、北向山区植被覆盖度差异呈逐年波动下降趋势,其差异值多年平均值夏季最低(0.009 3),秋季最高(0.014 2),春冬季分别为0.013 9,0.012 5。[结论
]
安徽省海拔、坡向显著影响植被覆盖度动态变化特征,需结合地形特点合理开发利用地表资源,并做好生态环境保护工作。
[Objective] The relationship between the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of vegetation coverage and topography in Anhui Province was explored in order to provide a theoretical basis for local resource development and ecological environment construction. [Methods] With the support of GIS and RS technology
MODIS / NDVI data of Anhui Province from 2001 to 2019
land classification data from 2001 to 2019
and DEM elevation and aspect topographic data of Anhui Province were used to analyze the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of vegetation coverage and its relationship with topographic factors. [Results] The seasonal variation characteristics of vegetation coverage in Anhui Province were obvious. In January and October to December
the vegetation coverage of Anhui Province was low
and the mountain area was higher than the plain; from February to May
vegetation coverage of Huaibei Plain was high
and decreased rapidly in June; from July to September
the vegetation coverage of Anhui Province was high
with most of the areas greater than 0.8
and the smallest spatial differences observed in the mountain and plain areas. The annual change rate of vegetation coverage was 0.003 9/a
and this change rate was significantly correlated with time (R2=0.814 8). Differences in vegetation coverage in the four seasons were obvious at different altitudes. Vegetation coverage below 200 m was affected by underlying surface types and showed low values. Vegetation coverage increased sharply between 200 m and 350 m
and presented a downward trend above 1 250 m. Vegetation coverage during the four seasons followed the order of summer > autumn > spring > winter. The north and south slopes presented the maximum and minimum values
respectively. Differences of vegetation coverage in the south and north mountain areas showed a downward trend over time. The annual average vegetation coverage differences of south and north mountains were lowest in summer (0.009 3) and highest in autumn (0.014 2)
while values in spring and winter were 0.013 9 and 0.012 5
respectively. [Conclusion] Altitude and aspect affected the dynamic variation characteristics of vegetation coverage significantly in Anhui Province. Considering these terrain characteristics is necessary for reasonable development and utilization of land surface resources
as well as for protecting the ecological environment.
贾金明,王运行,吴健河,等.气象与生活[M].北京:气象出版社,2008.
沈谦,朱长明,张新. GF-2支持下的干旱区稀疏植被区植被覆盖度估算[J].测绘通报,2019(7):33-38.
梁顺林,范闻捷.定量遥感[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
梁顺林,李小文,王锦地,等.定量遥感理念与算法[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:321-322.
Huete A R. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988,25(3):295-309.
Gitelson A A, Kaufman Y J, Stark R, et al. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,80(1):76-87.
张诗羽,张毅,王昌全,等.岷江上游流域植被覆盖度及其与地形因子的相关性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):69-75.
王亚娟,赵艳玲,焦利鹏,等.济宁市2005-2016年植被覆盖度变化及影响因素[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2018(3):171-177.
黄悦悦,杨东,冯磊.2000-2016年宁夏植被覆盖度的时空变化及其驱动力[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(8):2516-2523.
崔林丽,史军,肖风劲,等.中国东部NDVI的变化趋势及其与气候因子的相关分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(1):124-131.
王伟军,赵雪雁,万文玉,等.2000-2014年甘南高原植被覆盖度变化及其对气候变化的响应[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(9):2494-2504.
谭学玲,闫庆武,王瑾,等.榆神府矿区植被覆盖的动态变化及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(6):1645-1653.
穆梦圆,王秋云,赵雪婷,等.江西省降水与不同时空尺度下植被NDVI关系研究[J].气象与减灾研究,2015,38(3):1-9.
陈学兄,毕如田,张小军,韩伟宏.太原市城区植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):299-309.
王芳,汪左,张运.2000-2015年安徽省植被净初级生产力时空分布特征及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2018,38(8):2754-2767.
孙雷刚,刘剑锋,徐全洪.河北坝上地区植被覆盖变化遥感时空分析[J].国土资源遥感,2014,26(1):167-172.
穆少杰,李建龙,陈奕兆,等.2001-2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(9):1255-1266.
曾燕,邱新法,何永健,等.复杂地形下黄河流域月平均气温分布式模拟[J].中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2009,39(6):774-786.
邓凯,黄长江,袁慧慧,等.基于MODIS的2007-2017安徽省植被指数时空变化特征研究[J].黑龙江工程学院学报,2018,32(6):24-27.
Gutman G, Ignatov A. The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998,19(8):1533-1543.
何彬方,冯妍,吴文玉,等.安徽省近十年植被指数时空变化特征.生态学杂志,2010,29(10):1912-1918.
胡文敏,赵京,何介南,等.近15年来环洞庭湖区土地利用变化及其景观效应[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(12):91-97.
李晟铭,刘吉平,宋开山,等.基于Landsat影像巢湖蓝藻水华暴发时空变化特征及其驱动因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(5):1205-1213.
姚镇海,邱新法,施国萍,等.中国比辐射率空间分布特征分析[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(6):1234-1240.
姚镇海,邱新法,施国萍,等.我国近10年月平均NDVI空间分布特征分析[J].国土资源遥感,2017,29(2):181-186.
陈渭民,陶国庆,邱新法.全球气候系统卫星遥感导论-气象卫星资料的多学科应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2012.
翁笃鸣,罗哲贤.山区地形气候[M].北京:气象出版社,1990.
徐京京,黄建武,李丹,等.安徽省耕地压力指数时空分布特征及趋势预测[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,49(4):615-622.
陈桃,包安明,何大明.基于MODIS NDVI的攀枝花市植被覆盖度变化及驱动力[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(8):1847-1857.
魏建瑛,徐建英,樊斐斐.卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):440-449.
冯妍,何彬方,唐怀瓯,等.安徽省2000-2009年不同类型植被的变化及其与气温、降水的关系[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(11):2926-2934.
屈非凡,邱新法,曾燕,等.月平均气温物理经验统计模型优化研究[J].科技通报,2018,34(9):30-36,59.
姚镇海.融合遥感数据的月平均气温分布式模拟参数优化的研究[D].江苏南京:南京信息工程大学,2015.
0
浏览量
1452
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621