吉林大学 地球探测科学与技术学院,吉林,长春,130026
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
刘润, 姜琦刚, 史鹏飞, 等. 辽宁省抚顺市2000-2020年土地利用格局变化与生态环境效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):353-360.
Liu Run, Jiang Qigang, Shi Pengfei, et al. Change of Land Use Pattern and Ecological Environment Effect in Fushun City of Liaoning Province from 2000 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 353-360.
刘润, 姜琦刚, 史鹏飞, 等. 辽宁省抚顺市2000-2020年土地利用格局变化与生态环境效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):353-360. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.045.
Liu Run, Jiang Qigang, Shi Pengfei, et al. Change of Land Use Pattern and Ecological Environment Effect in Fushun City of Liaoning Province from 2000 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 353-360. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.045.
[目的
]
探讨辽宁省抚顺市退耕还林以来土地利用格局时空变化特征及生态环境效应,揭示土地利用格局变化对环境的影响,为该区土地利用结构优化提供科学依据。[方法
]
以2000,2010和2020年3期遥感影像为基础数据,通过土地利用动态度、土地利用程度综合指数、土地利用转移矩阵、NDVI差值分析、区域生态环境质量指数等方法定量分析抚顺市土地利用格局时空变化特征及生态环境效应。[结果
]
①2000—2020年研究区各种土地类型存在相互转化的关系,其中林地和耕地变化较为明显。20 a间,耕地面积减少825.59 km
2
,增长率-7.32%;林地面积增加591.14 km
2
,增长率5.24%;城镇用地面积增加182.36 km
2
,增长率1.62%; ②2000,2010和2020年研究区土地利用程度综合指数分别为224.48,225.57和226.12,同比增长0.49%和0.24%,研究区土地开发利用强度缓慢上升; ③研究区20 a间植被覆盖整体呈上升趋势,NDVI减少的区域与城镇用地的扩张区域基本重合; ④3个时期土地利用类型转化的生态环境质量指数分别为0.744 8,0.775 4和0.782 6,10 a间环境质量生态指数分别上升4.11%和0.93%,环境质量整体呈上升趋势。[结论
]
20 a间研究区快速推进城镇化进程的同时环境质量整体向好,局部范围内生态环境质量改善与恶化并存。城镇用地、耕地、林地之间的转化为主要原因,退耕还林等环境保护政策使研究区环境质量不断上升,但随着时间的推移,上升趋势趋于平缓。
[Objective] The spatiotemporal change characteristics of land use pattern and the effect of ecological environment in Fushun City
Liaoning Province after returning farmland to forestland were discussed
in order to provide reference for the optimization of land use structure in this area.[Methods] Based on the remote sensing images in 2000
2010 and 2020
the spatial and temporal change characteristics of land use pattern and the ecological environment effect in Fushun City were quantitatively analyzed by using the methods of land use dynamic degree
land use degree comprehensive index
land use transfer matrix
NDVI difference analysis and regional ecological environment quality index.[Results] ① From 2000 to 2020
there was a mutual transformation relationship between various land types in the study area
among which
the change of woodland and cultivated land was more obvious. During the past 20 years
the area of cultivated land decreased by 825.59 km2
with a growth rate of -7.32%. Forest land area increased by 591.14 km2
with a growth rate of 5.24%. Urban land area increased by 182.36 km2
with a growth rate of 1.62%. ② In 2000
2010 and 2020
the comprehensive index of land use degree in the study area was 224.48
225.57 and 226.12
respectively
with year-on-year growth of 0.49% and 0.24%. The intensity of land development and utilization in the study area increased slowly. ③ During the past 20 years
the vegetation coverage in the study area showed an upward trend. The decreased areas of NDVI basically coincided with the expanding areas of urban land. ④ The environmental quality index of land use transition in the three periods were 0.744 8
0.775 4 and 0.782 6
respectively. During the past 10 years
the environmental quality index increased by 4.11% and 0.93%
respectively
and the overall environmental quality showed an upward trend.[Conclusion] In the past 20 years
the rapid urbanization process in the study area has been promoted
the overall environmental quality has been improved
and the improvement and deterioration of ecological environmental quality coexist in some local areas. The transformation among urban land
cultivated land and woodland is the main reason. The environmental protection policies such as returning arable land to forest make the environmental quality in the study area continuously improve. But the upward trend flattens out over time.
Li He, Jing Shen, Yang Zhang. Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 206(15):1115-1125.
Newbold T, Hudson L N, Hill S L L, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7545):45-50.
Schneider A, Friedl M A, Potere D. Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500 m data:New methods and datasets based on ‘urban ecoregions’[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(8):1733-1746.
周岩, 刘世梁, 谢苗苗, 等.人类活动干扰下区域植被动态变化研究:以西双版纳为例[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(2):1-10.
刘海燕, 蒋慧, 胡宝清.广西西江流域土地利用变化的生态环境效应[J].南宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 37(1):104-111.
杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等.长三角地区城市土地利用与生态环境效应的交互作用机制研究[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2):220-231.
任涵, 张静静, 朱文博, 等.太行山淇河流域土地利用变化对生境的影响[J].地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12):1693-1704.
秦艳丽, 时鹏, 何文虹, 等.西安市城市化对景观格局及生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(22):8239-8250.
Li Xuecao, Gong Peng, Liang Lu. A 30-year(1984-2013) record of annual urban dynamics of Beijing City derived from Landsat data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 166(1):78-90.
王润生, 熊盛青, 聂洪峰, 等.遥感地质勘查技术与应用研究[J].地质学报, 2011, 85(11):1699-1743.
Zhang Xinchang, Kang Tingjun, Wang Haiying, et al. Analysis on spatial structure of landuse change based on remote sensing and geographical information system[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2010, 12(9):145-150.
王秀兰, 包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展, 1999, 18(1):3-5.
庄大方, 刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J].自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2):10-16.
谭静, 官冬杰, 虎帅.重庆三峡库区土地利用时空转型及其生态环境响应研究:以重庆市忠县为例[J].资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(3):311-315, 342.
李晓文, 方创琳, 黄金川, 等.西北干旱区城市土地利用变化及其区域生态环境效应:以甘肃河西地区为例[J].第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3):280-290, 348-349.
阿迪莱·如则, 阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 古丽米热·艾尔肯.开都-孔雀河流域土地利用转型及其功能变化特征[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(4):244-251.
Gong P, Liang S, Carlton E J, et al. Urbanisation and health in China[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9818):843-852.
0
浏览量
858
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621