1. 河北地质大学 河北省农业干旱遥感监测国际联合研究中心/河北省高校生态环境地质应用技术研发中心,河北,石家庄,050031
2. 河北建筑工程学院 市政与环境工程系,河北,张家口,075000
3. 河北省气象科学研究所,河北,石家庄,050021
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
王彦芳, 裴宏伟, 赵超. 河北坝上地区2000-2019年植被绿度动态及其土地利用/覆被变化归因分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):345-352.
Wang Yanfang, Pei Hongwei, Zhao Chao. Vegetation Greenness Change and Its Attribution Related to Land Use and Land Cover Change in Bashang Area of Hebei Province During 2000-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 345-352.
王彦芳, 裴宏伟, 赵超. 河北坝上地区2000-2019年植被绿度动态及其土地利用/覆被变化归因分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):345-352. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.044.
Wang Yanfang, Pei Hongwei, Zhao Chao. Vegetation Greenness Change and Its Attribution Related to Land Use and Land Cover Change in Bashang Area of Hebei Province During 2000-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 345-352. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.044.
[目的] 分析河北坝上地区植被绿度变化及土地利用/覆被变化,旨在为区域生态建设和京津冀生态环境支撑区的建设提供科学参考,为土地合理利用及生态环境保护提供决策支持。[方法] 以MODIS MOD13Q1 NDVI遥感数据为数据源,结合Landsat土地利用数据,使用线性倾向估计分析了2000—2019年坝上地区植被绿度的年际变化趋势,并定量分析了土地利用/覆被变化对其的影响。[结果] ①河北坝上地区主要生长季(4—10月)多年平均植被绿度整体上呈现坝东高,坝西低的空间格局,且林地>草地>耕地; ②研究时段坝上地区生长季NDVI最大值和平均值均呈现明显的增加趋势,速率分别为0.063/10 a和0.044/10 a,植被绿度显著提升区域比例为60%~83%; ③结合土地利用变化定量解析植被绿度年际变化发现,研究时段,坝上地区植被绿度变化量中,耕地的贡献率为50.51%~57.22%,其次,林地和草地的贡献率分别为21.73%~28.62%和14.41%~15.07%,水域、建设用地和未利用地的总贡献率在6%左右。[结论] 2000—2019年,坝上地区植被绿度增加趋势中耕地的贡献最大,但贡献率呈下降趋势,林地和草地的贡献逐渐增加。
[Objective] The vegetation greenness dynamics and attributions of land use/cover change in Bashang Plateau were analyzed
in order to provide scientific reference for the construction of local ecology and the environment support area for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
and to support decision-making for land use planning and ecological environment protection.[Methods] MODIS MOD13Q1 NDVI dataset and Landsat-derived land use data in Bashang area were used to analyze the change trend of vegetation greenness during 2000-2019 and its attribution by linear tendency estimation and partial derivative attribution method.[Results] The average vegetation greenness during the main growing season (April to October) was generally high in the east
while low in the west of the plateau. Moreover
the average vegetation greenness was the highest on the woodland
while the lowest on the cultivated land. During 2000-2019
the maximum and the average NDVI in Bashang area showed an obvious increasing trend
with the rates of 0.063/10 a and 0.044/10 a
respectively
and areas with significant improvement of vegetation greenness accounted for 60%~83%. According to the quantitative analysis of the interannual land use and land cover changes in Bashang Plateau
the contribution rate of cultivated land
woodland and grassland was 50.51%~57.22%
21.73%~28.62% and 14.41%~15.07%
respectively
during 2000-2019. The total contribution rate of water area
construction land and unused land was only 6%.[Conclusion] During 2000-2019
cultivated land contributed the most to vegetation greenness increase in Bashang area of Hebei Province
but the contribution rate shows a downward trend
and the contribution rates of woodland and grassland increases gradually.
Béguéa, Vintrou E, Ruelland D, et al. Can a 25-year trend in Soudano-Sahelian vegetation dynamics be interpreted in terms of land use change? A remote sensing approach[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2011, 21(2):413-420.
Wang Yanfang, Shen Yanjun, Chen Yaning, et al. Vegetation dynamics and their response to hydroclimatic factors in the Tarim River basin, China[J]. Ecohydrology, 2013, 6(6):6927-936.
Sarmah S, Jia G, Zhang A. Satellite view of seasonal greenness trends and controls in South Asia[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(3):034026.
刘爽, 宫鹏.2000-2010年中国地表植被绿度变化[J].科学通报, 2012, 57(16):1423-1434.
Piao Shilong, Yin Guodong, Tan Jianguang, et al. Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend in China over the last 30 years[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(4):1601-1609.
Yuan Jia, Xu Youpeng, Xiang Jie, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation coverage and its associated influence factor analysis in the Yangtze River Delta, Eastern China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(32):32866-32879.
王红岩, 李晓松, 张瑾, 等.北京一号, 环境星, Landsat TM传感器估算草地覆盖度、叶面积指数、地上生物量比较研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(10):2803-2808.
Zhang Chaobin, Zhang Ying, Wang Zhaoqi, et al. Monitoring phenology in the temperate grasslands of China from 1982 to 2015 and its relation to net primary productivity[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(1):12.
牛婷, 艾里西尔·库尔班, 玉米提·哈力克, 等.干旱区胡杨叶片含水量和叶绿素含量特征[J].生态学杂志, 2012, 31(6):1353-1360.
祁敏, 张超.森林理化参数高光谱遥感反演研究进展[J].世界林业研究, 2016, 29(1):52-57.
解宇阳, 王彬, 姚扬, 等.基于无人机激光雷达遥感的亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直结构分析[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(3):940-951.
侯美亭, 赵海燕, 王筝, 等.基于卫星遥感的植被NDVI对气候变化响应的研究进展[J].气候与环境研究, 2013, 18(3):353-364.
De Jong R, de Bruin S, de Wit A, et al. Analysis of monotonic greening and browning trends from global NDVI time-series[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(2):692-702.
Chen C, Park T, Wang X, et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2:122-129.
谢舒笛, 莫兴国, 胡实, 等.三北防护林工程区植被绿度对温度和降水的响应[J].地理研究, 2020, 39(1):152-165.
阎世杰, 王欢, 焦珂伟.京津冀地区植被时空动态及定量归因[J].地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5):767-780.
郭永强, 王乃江, 褚晓升, 等.基于Google Earth Engine分析黄土高原植被覆盖变化及原因[J].中国环境科学, 2019, 39(11):4804-4811.
景振华;刘珺;李松青.基于时序NDVI的山西六大煤田土地利用变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(8):80-86.
道日娜.气候与土地利用变化对三北地区植被NDVI的影响研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学, 2019.
王玫.河北坝上生态脆弱性及治理思路建议[J].经济论坛, 2018(10):11-15, 153.
杨连云, 穆兴增, 周伟文.坝上草原生态农业建设与改善京津环境质量研究[J].河北学刊, 2000(2):15-22.
刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等.20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J].地理学报, 2014, 69(1):3-14.
国家统计局农村社会经济调查司编.中国县域统计年鉴·2018(乡镇卷)[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2019.
刘晓.河北坝上土地沙化动态演变对生态系统服务的影响[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2019.
苏王新, 李卓, 陈书琴, 等.河北坝上地区植被覆盖演化特征及其风险评估[J].干旱区研究, 2018, 35(3):686-694.
孙雷刚, 刘剑锋, 徐全洪.河北坝上地区植被覆盖变化遥感时空分析[J].国土资源遥感, 2014, 26(1):167-172.
彭博.河北坝上沙化区土地利用格局对沙化程度影响研究[D].河北保定:河北农业大学, 2019.
陈辉, 刘劲松, 王卫.冀北地区植被指数变化特征及影响因素分析[J].地理科学, 2008, 28(6):793-798.
张晓凤.坝上地区植被覆盖变化及影响因素分析[D].山东烟台:鲁东大学, 2016.
0
浏览量
950
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621